Citation Information :
Nelwan SC, Karuniadewi AA, Nowwarote N, Dewi AM, Prayogo RD. Accuracy of Digital Intraoral Scans Three-dimensional Surface Analysis Compared with Plaster Models Dental Measurement in Mixed Dentition. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024; 17 (12):1363-1369.
Aims and background: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of digital intraoral scans in capturing the three-dimensional (3D) surface of teeth and dental arches in mixed dentition, compared with conventional plaster models. Intraoral scanning technology has seen rapid advancements in recent years, revolutionizing orthodontic and dental practices. However, its accuracy in mixed dentition remains a subject of investigation.
Materials and methods: Children with mixed dentition (n = 34) were selected according to specific criteria. Digital intraoral scanning was performed using the Medit i500, and conventional plaster models were created following alginate impression techniques. The arch widths on the 3D digital models were measured using Medit Link software, while the conventional models were measured using calipers. Both sets of data were then analyzed using Moyer's analysis.
Results: The results of the study showed no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the mean space analysis measurements obtained conventionally and digitally in the mixed dentition phase using Moyer's analysis method.
Conclusion: Despite minor discrepancies compared to conventional plaster models, digital intraoral scans offer a clinically acceptable level of accuracy for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. The benefits of digital scanning, including improved patient experience and enhanced digital workflows, make it a promising tool for modern dental and orthodontic practices.
Clinical significance: There is no significant difference between space analysis measurements in the mixed dentition phase using Moyer's analysis on conventional and 3D digital models.
Cervino G, Fiorillo L, Herford AS, et al. Alginate materials and dental impression technique: a current state of the art and application to dental practice. Mar Drugs 2018;17:18. DOI: 10.3390/md17010018
Labib MA, El-Beialy AR, Attia KH. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital models obtained using intraoral and extraoral scanners versus gold standard plaster model (diagnostic accuracy study). Open J Med Imaging 2020;10(3):151–163. DOI: 10.4236/ojmi.2020.103015
Schieffer L, Latzko L, Ulmer H, et al. Comparison between stone and digital cast measurements in mixed dentition: validity, reliability, reproducibility, and objectivity. J Orofac Orthop 2022;83:75–84. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-022-00376-9
Jajee M, Patil VS, Patil BC, et al. Comparative evaluation of accuracy, time and patient acceptance between intraoral scanner and conventional alginate impression technique—an in vivo study. IP Indian J Orthod Dentofac Res 2023;9(3):183–191. DOI: 10.18231/j.ijodr.2023.033
Dewi RK, Pradopo S, Nelwan SC. Early treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion using twin block appliances: a case report. Dentino Jur Ked Gigi 2022;7:94–99. DOI: 10.20527/dentino.v7i1.13111
Marwah N, Vishwanathaiah S, Ravi GR. Textbook of Pediatric Dentistry, 4th Edition; 2021. p. 1134.
Premkumar S. Textbook of Orthodontics. India: Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd; 2015.
Liczmanski K, Stamm T, Sauerland C, et al. Accuracy of intraoral scans in the mixed dentition: a prospective non-randomized comparative clinical trial. Head Face Med 2020;16(1):11. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-020-00222-6
Al-Dulaimy DA, Al-Khannaq MRA, Nahidh M. Conventional versus digital assessment of dental arches’ perimeters in mixed dentition. J Hunan Univ Nat Sci 2022;49(1):101–111. DOI: 10.55463/issn.1674-2974.49.1.13
Rahardjo P. Diagnosis Ortodontik. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press; 2011. pp. 53–54.
Zhang F, Suh KJ, Lee KM. Validity of intraoral scans compared with plaster models: an in-vivo comparison of dental measurements and 3D surface analysis. PLoS One 2016;11(6):e0157713. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157713
Burzynski JA, Firestone AR, Beck FM, et al. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: time and patient satisfaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153(4):534–541. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.017
Suese K. Progress in digital dentistry: the practical use of intraoral scanners. Dent Mater J 2020;39:52–56. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2019-224