International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2024 ) > List of Articles

SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND META ANALYSIS

Alveolar Bone and Gingival Changes in Mandibular Anterior Region Following Herbst Appliance Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Mrithulaa Vadivel Kumar, Annapurna Kannan, Vignesh Kailasam

Keywords : Bone loss, Functional appliances, Gingival recession, Herbst appliance, Lower incisor

Citation Information : Kumar MV, Kannan A, Kailasam V. Alveolar Bone and Gingival Changes in Mandibular Anterior Region Following Herbst Appliance Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024; 17 (1):114-120.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2715

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 14-03-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Objective: To assess the alveolar bone changes and gingival recession following Herbst appliance therapy. Materials and methods: Electronic databases such as PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, Lilacs, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched until August 2022. Hand-searching of major orthodontic journals was performed to identify all peer-reviewed articles potentially relevant to the review. The quality of the selected studies was ranked using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for nonrandomized trials—Risk of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies (ROBINS) 1. Results: Five relevant articles (all nonrandomized studies) were considered for qualitative analysis. The risk of bias was low for four studies and moderate for one. The reduction in the vertical alveolar bone height was 0.13 ± 0.07 mm, with the Herbst appliance. The mean difference in the loss of buccal cortical thickness between the Herbst appliance and untreated control group was 0.22 mm [95% confidence interval (CI) of −0.62–0.18]. Subsequent to Herbst appliance therapy, in the mandibular anterior region 0.1 ± 0.5 mm of gingival recession was observed. Conclusion: Herbst appliance treatment produces a negligible reduction in the buccal cortical thickness, vertical alveolar bone height, and gingival recession. Clinical significance: Though the changes produced by the Herbst appliance were minimal, they are clinically important considering the young age of the patients warranting periodic periodontal assessment.


PDF Share
  1. Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KW, et al. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques, 5th edition. Elsevier Health Sciences.
  2. Ciavarella D, Tepedino M, Gallo C, et al. Post-orthodontic position of lower incisors and gingival recession: a retrospective study. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9(12):e1425–e1430. DOI: 10.4317/jced.54261
  3. Djeu G, Hayes C, Zawaideh S. Correlation between mandibular central incisor proclination and gingival recession during fixed appliance therapy. Angle Orthod 2002;72(3):238–245. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0238:CBMCIP>2.0.CO;2
  4. Yang X, Zhu Y, Long H, et al. The effectiveness of the Herbst appliance for patients with Class II malocclusion: a meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2016;38(3):324–333. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjv057
  5. Hansen K, Koutsonas TG, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment on the mandibular incisor segment: a cephalometric and biometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112(1):92–103. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70279-8
  6. Proffit WR, Fields HJ Jr. Contemporary Orthodontics, 4th edition. St Louis, Missouri: Mosby Year Book; 2007. p. 73.
  7. Choi YJ, Chung CJ, Kim KH. Periodontal consequences of mandibular incisor proclination during presurgical orthodontic treatment in class III malocclusion patients. Angle Orthod 2015;85(3):427–433. DOI: 10.2319/021414-110.1
  8. Wijayaratne D, Harkness M, Herbison P. Functional appliance treatment assessed using the PAR index. Aust Orthod J 2000;16(3):118–126.
  9. Chen JY, Will LA, Niederman R. Analysis of efficacy of functional appliances on mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122(5):470–476. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.126730
  10. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 1st edition. Nashville, Tennessee: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
  11. Chapter 25: Assessing risk of bias in a non-randomized study [Internet]. Cochrane.org. [cited 2021 May 24]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-25
  12. RevMan [Internet]. Cochrane.org. [cited 2021 May 24]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/online-learning/core-software-cochrane-reviews/revman
  13. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557–560. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  14. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71
  15. Schwartz JP, Raveli TB, Schwartz-Filho HO, et al. Changes in alveolar bone support induced by the Herbst appliance: a tomographic evaluation. Dental Press J Orthod 2016;21(2):95–101. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.095-101.oar
  16. Gerszewski C, Topolski F, Correr GM, et al. Dentoalveolar evaluation of lower incisors by CBCT after treatment with Herbst appliance. Braz Dent J 2018;29(6):562–568. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201802382
  17. Bié MD, Moro A, Moresca R, et al. Avaliação tomográfica da região dos incisivos inferiores após tratamento com o aparelho de Herbst. Orthod sci pract 2013;6(21):33–40.
  18. Pancherz H, Bjerklin K. Mandibular incisor inclination, tooth irregularity, and gingival recessions after Herbst therapy: a 32-year follow-up study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;146(3):310–318. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.02.009
  19. Ruf S, Hansen K, Pancherz H. Does orthodontic proclination of lower incisors in children and adolescents cause gingival recession? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114(1):100–106. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70244-6
  20. McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res synth methods 2021;12(1):55–61. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1411
  21. Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciğer S, et al. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122(1):15–26. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.119804
  22. Yamada C, Kitai N, Kakimoto N, et al. Spatial relationships between the mandibular central incisor and associated alveolar bone in adults with mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 2007;77(5):766–772. DOI: 10.2319/072906-309
  23. Ten Hoeve A, Mulie RM. The effect of antero-postero incisor repositioning on the palatal cortex as studied with laminagraphy. J Clin Orthod 1976;10(11):804–822.
  24. Vardimon AD, Oren E, Ben-Bassat Y. Cortical bone remodeling/tooth movement ratio during maxillary incisor retraction with tip versus torque movements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114(5):520–529. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70172-6
  25. Wainwright WM. Faciolingual tooth movement: its influence on the root and cortical plate. Am J Orthod 1973;64(3):278–302. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(73)90021-3
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.