International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Microbial Evaluation of Root Canals after Biomechanical Preparation with Manual K-files, Manual H-files, and Kedo-SG Blue Rotary Files: An In Vivo Study

Lakshimi Lakshmanan

Keywords : Biomechanical preparation, Kedo files, Manual files, Microbial, Rotary files

Citation Information : Lakshmanan L. Microbial Evaluation of Root Canals after Biomechanical Preparation with Manual K-files, Manual H-files, and Kedo-SG Blue Rotary Files: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022; 15 (6):687-690.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2457

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 14-02-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Aim: The purpose of the present study was to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of Kedo-SG blue rotary files, manual K-files, and manual H-files in eliminating the root canal microflora of primary molars. Materials and methods: Forty-five primary molars requiring pulpectomy were included in the study. Based on type of instrumentation, the teeth were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: group A: Kedo-SG blue rotary files, group B: manual H-files, and group C: manual K-files. Sterile absorbent paper points were used for sample collection and stored in sterile Eppendorf tubes containing saline as transport medium. Culturing was done on thioglycolate agar and blood agar media for the cultivation of anaerobic and aerobic microbes, respectively, and recorded as colony-forming units (CFU) using digital colony counter. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test were performed for statistical analysis. Results: Postinstrumentation, 93–96% reduction of aerobic and anaerobic microbial count was recorded in group A. Whereas, it was 87–91% reduction in group B and 90–91% reduction in group C. No statistically significant difference was noted between the three groups. Conclusion: Kedo-SG blue rotary files showed a better reduction of microbes in root canals when compared to manual instrumentation. However, there was no significant difference between manual and rotary instrumentation in microbial reduction of primary root canals.

PDF Share
  1. Arora RS, Rawat P, Bhayya DP. A comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of three endodontic sealers: Endoflas FS, AH Plus and sealapex against Enterococcus faecalis—an in vitro study. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2014;13(3):90–93. DOI: 10.9790/0853-13349093
  2. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, et al. Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997;30(5):297–306. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1997.00092.x
  3. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod 2008;34(11):1291–1301. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.028
  4. Silva LA, Leonardo MR, Nelson-Filho P, et al. Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars. J Dent Child (Chic) 2004;71(1):45–47.
  5. Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of an iodoform paste in root canal therapy for infected primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child 1987;54(1):30–34.
  6. Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 1999;21(7):453–454.
  7. Lakshmanan L, Jeevandan G. Evaluation of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using Kedo-S Square file, H file and K file in primary molars—a randomized controlled trial. Int J Pharm Res 2020;12(2):3507–3514. DOI: 10.31838/ijpr/2020.sp1.493
  8. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Clinical evaluation of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using two modified rotary file systems with manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11(9):ZC55–ZC58. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/30069.10602
  9. Jeevanandan G, Kedo S. Paediatric rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth—case report. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11(3):ZR03–ZR05. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25856.9508
  10. Subramaniam P, Tabrez TA, Babu KL. Microbiological assessment of root canals following use of rotary and manual instruments in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;38(2):123–127. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.38.2.j84265t82u60271u
  11. Lin LM, Skribner JE, Gaengler P. Factors associated with endodontic treatment failures. J Endod 1992;18(12):625–627. DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)81335-x
  12. Nazari Moghaddam K, Mehran M, Farajian Zadeh H. Root canal cleaning efficacy of rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molars. Iran Endod J 2009;4(2):53–57.
  13. Azar MR, Safi L, Nikaein A. Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and Pro Taper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9(2):146–151. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.95227
  14. Katge F, Patil D, Poojari M, et al. Comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning efficacy of manual instrumentation, rotary systems, and reciprocating systems in primary teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014;32(4):311–316. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.140957
  15. Priyadarshini P, Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L, et al. Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2020; 21(6):693–701. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-020-00518-w
  16. Byström A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 1981;89(4):321–328. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1981.tb01689.x
  17. Siqueira JF, Alves FRF, Almeida BM, et al. Ability of chemomechanical preparation with either rotary instruments or self-adjusting file to disinfect oval-shaped root canals. J Endod 2010;36(11):1860–1865. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.001
  18. Sundqvist G, Figdor D. Life as an endodontic pathogen. Endod Topics 2003;6(1):3–28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2003.00054.x
  19. Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer HH. How useful is root canal culturing in predicting treatment outcome? J Endod 2007;33(3):220–225. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.006
  20. Dalton BC, Orstavik D, Phillips C, et al. Bacterial reduction with nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. J Endod 1998;24(1):763–767. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80170-2
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.