International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE S1 ( Special issue-1 (Pediatr Endodont), 2022 ) > List of Articles


Modified Conventional Root Canal Shaping Technique in Primary Teeth: An In Vivo Study

Rajendra Reddy E, Srikanth S Raju, Thabitha Sandipamu, Kiranmayi M, Srujana Palicarp Mudusu, Sai Divya Saraswati

Keywords : Modified root canal shaping technique, Primary teeth, Quality of obturation, Voids

Citation Information :

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2121

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-02-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Aim and objective: The purpose of the study was to compare the efficiency of modified conventional root canal shaping technique versus conventional shaping technique in primary teeth. Materials and methods: A total of 184 primary root canals (2 groups of 92 canals each) with two-thirds of root length were selected and randomly allocated into two different shaping techniques, i.e., Group I: conventional root canal shaping technique, Group II: modified root canal shaping technique. The quality of obturation (Coll and Sadrain, 1996) and presence or absences of voids were assessed by using radiographs. The recorded data was statistically analyzed. Results: Significant difference was seen between conventional and modified conventional techniques in underfilled and optimally filled canals. Conclusion: This modified cleaning and shaping technique can be considered as alternative to conventional instrumentation technique, as it improves quality of obturation and decreases the number of voids.

  1. Ureyen Kaya B, Keçeci AD, Guldas HE, et al. A retrospective radiographic study of coronal-periapical status and root canal filling quality in a selected adult Turkish population. Med Princ Pract 22(4): 334–339. DOI: 10.1159/000346940
  2. Kalender A, Orhan K, Aksoy U, et al. Influence of the quality of endodontic treatment and coronal restorations on the prevalence of apical periodontitis in a Turkish Cypriot population Med Princ Pract 22(2): 555–560. DOI: 10.1159/000341753
  3. Kierklo A, Tabor Z, Pawińska M, et al. A Microcomputed Tomography-Based Comparison of Root Canal Filling Quality following Different Instrumentation and Obturation Techniques. Med Princ Pract 2015;24(1):84–91. DOI: 10.1159/000368307
  4. Kummer TR, Calvo MC, Cordeiro MM, et al. Ex vivo study of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques in human primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105(4):e84–e92. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.12.008
  5. Mehlawat R, Kapoor R, Gandhi K, et al. Comparative evaluation of instrumentation timing and cleaning efficacy in extracted primary molars using manual and NiTi rotary technique – In vitro study J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2019;9(2):151–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.03.003
  6. Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000;22(1):77–78.
  7. Azar MR, Safi L, Nikaein A. Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and ProTaper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth. Dent Res J 2012;9(2):146–151. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.95227
  8. Coll JA, Sandrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and its succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent 1996;18:57–63.
  9. Frankl SN. Pulp therapy in pedodontics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;34(2):293–309. DOI:10.1016/0030-4220(72)90422-7
  10. Curzon MEJ, Roberts JF, Kennedy DB. Paediatric operative dentistry, 4th edition. Bothell, WA: Wright 1996. pp. 143–144.
  11. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the Pulp, 9th edition. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006. pp. 301–311.
  12. Farhin K, Devendra P, Jitesh P, et al. Application of Rotary Instrumentation in Paediatric Endodontics - A Review. I J Pre Clin Dent Res 2014;1(3):48–52.
  13. Crespo S, Cortes O, Garcia C, et al. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;32(4):295–298. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.32.4.l57l36355u606576
  14. Morankar R, Goyal A, GaubaK, et al. Manual versus rotary instrumentation for primary molar pulpectomies- A 24 months randomized clinical trial. Pediatric Dent J 2018;28(2):96–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdj.2018.02.002
  15. Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EM. Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K–file, H–files, and rotary Kedo–S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: A randomized controlled trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2019;37(1):75–79. DOI: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_72_18
  16. Barbizam JVB, Fariniuk LF, Marchesan MA, et al. Effectiveness of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques for cleaning flattened root canals. J Endod 2002;28(5):365–366. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200205000-00004
  17. Mokhtari N, Sarraf-Shirazi A, Ebrahimi MA. Smart rotary technique versus conventional pulpectomy for primary teeth: A randomized controlled clinical study. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9(11):e1292-e1296. DOI: 10.4317/jced.53968
  18. Diaconu O, Batăiosu M, Ţuculina M, et al. The Mechanic Canal Treatment Using the Protaper Manual System. Curr Health Sci J 2009;35(2):140–142. DOI 10.12865/CHSJ.35.02.12
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.