International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2021 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Different Luting Cements for Cementation of Stainless Steel Bands on Primary Molar Crowns (Stainless Steel and Zirconia Crowns): An In Vitro Study

Ritesh Kalaskar, Rajesh Ijalkar, Ashita Kalaskar, Shruti Balasubramanian

Keywords : Bond strength, Glass ionomer cements, Self-adhesive resin cement, Stainless steel crown, Zirconia crown

Citation Information : Kalaskar R, Ijalkar R, Kalaskar A, Balasubramanian S. Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Different Luting Cements for Cementation of Stainless Steel Bands on Primary Molar Crowns (Stainless Steel and Zirconia Crowns): An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021; 14 (6):762-767.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2003

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 06-01-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim and background: Primary teeth are the valuable assets of a child. Apart from the obvious function of delivering esthetics, their most important function is space maintenance for the succeeding permanent teeth. At times, due to unavoidable pathological conditions, there is premature loss of primary teeth. Space maintainers can either be banded to the enamel surfaces of healthy adjacent teeth or to the surfaces of full coronal restorations, the most common ones being stainless steel crowns (SSCs) and zirconia crowns (ZCs). Due to esthetic demands, ZCs have started replacing SSCs and therefore, there needs to be data on the banding of space maintainers on ZCs and the bond strengths obtained on cementations. Thus, the present study planned to evaluate and compare the bond strengths obtained by the banding of stainless steel bands (SSBs) over SSCs and ZCs using type I glass ionomer cement (GIC) and self-adhesive resins. Materials and methods: Sixty primary right mandibular molars were divided into four groups, group I, with cementation of SSB on SSC with type I GIC; group II, with cementation of SSB on SSC with self-adhesive resin cement; group III, with cementation of SSB on ZC with type I GIC; and group IV, with cementation of SSB on ZC with self-adhesive resin cement. Results: The mean bond strength value of GIC as luting cements in group I is 1.13 ± 0.075 MPa. The mean bond strength value of self-adhesive resin as luting cements in group II is 1.70 ± 0.104 MPa. The mean bond strength value of GIC as luting cements in group III is 1.38 ± 0.100 MPa. The mean bond strength value of self-adhesive resin as luting cements in group IV is 2.06 ± 0.119 MPa. Conclusion: The bond strength of self-adhesive resin was higher when SSB was cemented over SSC when compared with the bond strength of GIC when SSB was cemented over ZC.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Colak H, Dülgergil CT, Dalli M, et al. Early childhood caries update: a review of causes, diagnoses, and treatments. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2013;4(1):29–38. DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.107257
  2. Zou J, Meng M, Law CS, et al. Common dental diseases in children and malocclusion. Int J Oral Sci 2018;10(1):7. DOI: 10.1038/s41368-018- 0012-3
  3. Consolaro A. Should deciduous teeth be preserved in adult patients? How about stem cells? Is it reasonable to preserve them? Dental Press J Orthod 2016;21(2):15–27. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.015-027.oin
  4. Setia V, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, et al. Space maintainers in dentistry: past to present. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7(10):2402–2405. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6604.3539
  5. Bawazir OA, Elaraby A, Alshamrani H, et al. Effect of sandblasting and type of cement on the bond strength of molar bands on stainless steel crowns. J Dent Child(Chic) 2015;82(2):64–69.
  6. Raut A, Rao PL, Ravindranath T. Zirconium for esthetic rehabilitation: an overview. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22(1):140–143. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.79979
  7. Seale NS. The use of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent 2002;24(5):501–505.
  8. Srivastava N, Tyagi M, Rana V, et al. Comparative evaluation of different properties of various luting agents used for cementing stainless steel bands on molars. An ex-vivo study. EC Dent Sci 2019(9): 934–942.
  9. Beemer RL, Ferracane JL, Howard HE. Orthodontic band retention on primary molar stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent 1993;15(6): 408–413.
  10. Khatri A, Nandlal B, Srilatha. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of conventional composite resin and nanocomposite resin to sandblasted primary anterior stainless steel crown. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2007;25(2):82–85. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.33453
  11. Stewart D, Tufekci E, Moon pc, Lindauer S. Bonding orthodontic brackets to stainless steel crowns. AADR annual meeting. 2010.
  12. Grover N, Nandlal B. An in vitro evaluation of the effect of sandblasting and laser surface treatment on the shear bond strength of a composite resin to the facial surface of primary anterior stainless steel crowns. J Clin Exp Dent 2015;7(1):e119–e125. DOI: 10.4317/jced.51876
  13. Parisay I, Khazaei Y. Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: an in vitro study. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2018;15(3):201–207. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.231864
  14. Elsoud A, Hammouda H, Abdellatif A. Effect of teeth contamination on the retention of luted stainless steel crowns on primary molars. Acta Scienti Dent Sci 2009;3(5):39–44.
  15. Özcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 2015;17(1):7–26. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a33525
  16. Park C, Lee J, Lee H, et al. Bond strength of band on zirconia crown with compomer and resin cement. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2019;46(2):127–134. DOI: 10.5933/JKAPD.2019.46.2.127
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.