International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE S1 ( Supplement, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach

Preeti Singh, Nikhil Srivastava, Vivek Rana, Noopur Kaushik

Keywords : Biological restorations, Marginal integrity, Occlusal wear, Primary teeth

Citation Information :

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1870

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-00-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background: To widen the treatment option of primary teeth with mutilated crown tooth structure but having more than two-thirds of root structure were restored by using natural tooth crowns with the help of adhesive materials. Aim and objective: To restore the grossly decayed primary molars with biological crowns and to evaluate them for longevity, change in color, occlusal wear, marginal integrity, and patient/parent acceptance. Materials and methods: Twenty primary molars from 6 to 10 years old children were restored with biological crowns (extracted/exfoliated tooth crowns) and follow-up was done till 12 months. Data tabulated and results were statistically analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. The statistical software SPSS 19.0 was used. Results: 89.47% of biological restorations survived successfully till 12 months follow-up period. No occlusal wear was found in any of the samples, a breach in marginal integrity was seen only in 16.6% of cases, and only 5.5% of biological crowns showed discoloration (darker) at 12 months intervals. 65.00% of patients well accepted the treatment and showed satisfaction while 20.0% of patients remained neutral. Only 15% of patients experienced dissatisfaction at the end of the study. Conclusion: Biological restorations proved to be a viable alternative for the restoration of grossly mutilated primary molars.


PDF Share
  1. Brambilla E, Cagetti MG, Gagliani M, et al. Influence of different adhesive restorative materials on mutans streptococci colonization. Am J Dent 2005;18(3):173.
  2. Innes NP, Ricketts D, Evans DJ. Preformed metal crowns for decayed molar teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;24(1):1–10.
  3. Shanthi M, Thimma Reddy BV, Bahruddin, et al. Biological restoration: a simple method for reconstruction of severely damaged primary anterior teeth. Dent J Malays 2013;35(4):221.
  4. Jain M, Singla S, Bhushan BA, et al. Esthetic rehabilitation of anterior primary teeth using polyethylene fiber with two different approaches. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011;29(4):327–332. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.86381.
  5. Bajaj N, Grewal N, Monga P, et al. Association of physical properties and maintenance of sterility of primary teeth in human tooth bank. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014;32(4):279–285. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.140939.
  6. Santosh J, Bianchi J. Restoration of severely damaged teeth with resin bonding systems: Case report. Quintessence Int 1991;22(8):611–615.
  7. Chosack ABDS, Eidelman EDO. Rehabilitation of fracture incisor using the patient's natural crown: case report. J Dent Child 1964;31(1):19–21.
  8. Mathur S, Rahul C, Pandit IK, et al. Biological restoration of a grossly decayed deciduous mandibular molar. J Clin Diagn Res 2012;6(1):139–141.
  9. Singhania H, Pandey V. Biological restoration in dentistry – a review. Int J Res Health and Allied Sci 2016;2:3.
  10. Tavares AC, Goes WA, Paixo RF, et al. Reconstrucao de dente deciduo humano. Relato de Caso. Rev Faculdade Odontol FZL 1992;4:113–117.
  11. Frank JM. The evolution of direct composites. J Hist Dent 2011;32(1):1–1.
  12. Ehrmann EH. Restoration of a fractured incisor with exposed pulp using original tooth fragment: report of a case. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;118(2):83. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1989.0244.
  13. Logan WHG, Kronfeld R. Development of the human jaws and surrounding structures from birth to the age of fifteen years. J Am Dent Assoc 1933;20(3):379–427.
  14. Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC. Flowable resin composites: a systematic review and clinical considerations. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9(6):18. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12294.6129.
  15. Hojat M, Louis DZ, Maxwell K, et al. A brief instrument to measure patient's overall satisfaction with primary care physicians. Fam Med-Kansas City 2011;43(6):412–417.
  16. Roulet JF. Marginal integrity: clinical significance. J Dent 1994;22(1):S9–S12. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(94)90164-3.
  17. Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Rev Clin Res Aspe J Dent 2010;38(2):2–16.
  18. Smith BG, Knight JK. An index for measuring the wear of teeth. Br Dent J 1984;156(12):435–438. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4805394.
  19. Sarapultseva M, Sarapultsev A. Long‐term results of crown fragment reattachment techniques for fractured anterior teeth: a retrospective case‐control study. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019(3):1. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12456.
  20. Mendes L, Laxe L, Passos L. Ten-year follow-up of a fragment reattachment to an anterior tooth: a conservative approach. Case Rep Dent 2017;12(2):23–25. DOI: 10.1155/2017/2106245.
  21. Karre D, Swathi SS, Mohsin B, et al. Conservative vertical groove technique for tooth rehabilitation: 3-year follow-up. Case Rep Dent 2018;23(1):123–125. DOI: 10.1155/2018/2012578.
  22. Garcia FC, Poubel DL, Almeida JC, et al. Tooth fragment reattachment techniques—a systematic review. Dent Traumatol 2018;34(3):135–143. DOI: 10.1111/edt.12392.
  23. Indira MD, Dhull KS, Nandlal B, et al. Biological restoration in pediatric dentistry: a brief insight. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(3):197–201. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1264.
  24. Grewal N, Reeshu S. Case report biological restoration: an alternative esthetic treatment for restoration of severely mutilated primary anterior teeth. Int J Clinc Pediatr Dent 2008;1(1):42–47.
  25. Das UK, Maiti N. Nature's own alternative- restoration with biological crowns. Int J Pediatr Dent 2014;3(2):144–149.
  26. Kupietzky A, Waggoner WF. Parental satisfaction with bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors. Pediatr dentis. 2004;26(4):337–340.
  27. Glendor U. Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries – a 12 year review of the literature. Dent Traumatol 2008;24(6):603–611. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00696.x.
  28. Busato AL, Loguercio AD, Barbosa AN, et al. Biological restorations using tooth fragments. Am J Dent 1998;11(1):46–49.
  29. Reis A, Loguercio AD, Kraul A, et al. Reattachment of fractured teeth: a review of literature regarding techniques and materials. Oper Dent 2004;29:226–233.
  30. Mandroli PS. Biologic restoration of primary anterior teeth. A case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2003;21:95–97.
  31. Botelho AM, Tavano KT, Souza LT, et al. Crown total made by the technique of biological restoration. Int J Braz Dent 2009;5:284–292.
  32. Tavano KT, Botelho M, Motta TP, et al. Biological restoration: total crown anterior. Dent Traumatol 2009;25(5):535–540. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00766.x.
  33. Chu FC, Yim TM, Wei SH. Clinical considerations for reattachment of tooth fragments. Quintessence Int 2000;31:385–391.
  34. Duhan H, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, et al. Clinical comparison of various esthetic restorative options for coronal build-up of primary anterior teeth. J Dent Res 2015;12(6):574–580. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.170578.
  35. Ramires-Romito AC, Wanderley M, Oliviera MD, et al. Biological restoration of primary anterior teeth. Quintessence Int 2003;31(6):405–409.
  36. Sanches K, Carvalho FK, Nelson-Filho P, et al. Biological restorations as a treatment option for primary molars with extensive coronal destruction: report of two cases. Braz Dent J 2007;18(3):248–252. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-64402007000300014.
  37. Guler AU, Yilmaz F, Kulumk T, et al. Effects of different drink on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94(2):118–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.004.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.