International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 1 ( January-February, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

A Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Dental Age Estimation Methods in India: A Test of Ethnic Variability

Kirti Chaudhry, Manjit Talwar, Narasimha RV Vanga, Gurvanit K Lehl

Keywords : Demirjian method, Dental age estimation, Forensic odontology, Forensic sciences, Haavikko method, Willems method

Citation Information : Chaudhry K, Talwar M, Vanga NR, Lehl GK. A Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Dental Age Estimation Methods in India: A Test of Ethnic Variability. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020; 13 (1):16-20.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1708

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 25-10-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the applicability of Demirjian, Willems, and Haavikko methods of dental age estimation in southeastern (Dravidian ethnicity) and northwestern regions (Aryan ethnicity) of the Indian population. Materials and methods: The study includes the orthopantomographs (OPGs) of 303 individuals (173 males and 130 females) of age ranging from 5 to 14 years. The participants in the present research were evaluated under two study groups: group I: participants of the southeastern region and group II: participants of the northwestern region. Dental age was calculated using Demirjian, Willems, and Haavikko methods and compared with the chronologic age of each participant. The accuracy of dental age estimation methods was evaluated by mean absolute error. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t tests were used to test the significant difference between the chronologic age and estimated dental ages. Results: The Demirjian method showed overestimation, while Willems and Haavikko methods showed underestimation for boys and girls in both the ethnic groups of Indian population. The Willems method of dental age estimation showed comparatively more accurate and reliable results in both the ethnic groups of the Indian population. Conclusion: The dental age estimation by Demirjian, Willems, and Haavikko methods showed no significant variation between the different ethnicities of the Indian population. Clinical significance: The present research will be helpful in pedodontic, orthodontic, and forensic investigations for accurate and reliable dental age estimation in different parts of Indian population.


PDF Share
  1. Demirjian A, Goldstein H. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 1973;45(2):211–227.
  2. Maber M, Liversidge HM, Hector MP. Accuracy of age estimation of radiographic methods using developing teeth. Forensic Sci Int 2006;159(1):68–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.019.
  3. Moorrees CF, Fanning EA, Hunt EE. Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res 1963;42:1490–1502. DOI: 10.1177/00220345630420062701.
  4. Panchbhai AS. Review dental radiographic indicators, a key to age estimation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40(4):199–212. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/19478385.
  5. Koshy S, Tandon S. Dental age assessment: the applicability of Demirjian's method in South Indian children. Forensic Sci Int 1998;94(1–2):73–85. DOI: 10.1016/S0379-0738(98)00034-6.
  6. Willems G. A review of the most commonly used dental age estimation techniques. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2001;19(1):9–17.
  7. Liversidge HM, Speechly T, Hector MP. Dental maturation in British children: are Demirjian's standards applicable? Int J Paediatr Dent 1999;9(4):263–269. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.1999.00144.x.
  8. Frucht S, Schnegelsberg C, Monting SJ, et al. Dental age in southwest Germany: a radiographic study. J Orofac Orthop 2000;61(5):318–329. DOI: 10.1007/PL00001902.
  9. Willems G, Olmen AV, Spiessens B, et al. Dental age estimation in Belgian children: Demirjian's technique revisited. J Forensic Sci 2001;46(4):893–895. DOI: 10.1520/JFS15064J.
  10. Butti AC. Haavikko's method to assess dental age in Italian children. Eur J Orthod 2009;31(2):150–155. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjn081.
  11. Papiha SS. Genetic variations in India. Hum Biol 1996;68(5):607–628.
  12. Patnana AK, Vabbalareddy RS, Vanga NRV. Evaluating the reliability of three different dental age estimation methods in Visakhapatnam children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(3):186–191. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1262.
  13. Prabhakar AR, Panda AK, Raju OS. Applicability of Demirjian's method of age assessment in children of Davangere. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2002;20(2):54–62.
  14. Mohammed RB, Sanghvi P, Perumalla KK, et al. Accuracy of four dental age estimation methods in southern Indian children. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9((1):1–8. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/10141.5495.
  15. Malik P, Saha R, Agarwal A. Applicability of Demirjian's method of age assessment in a North Indian female population. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2012;13(2):133–135.
  16. Mohammed RB, Krishnamraju PV, Prasanth PS, et al. Dental age estimation using Willems method: a digital orthopantomographic study. Contemp Clin Dent 2014;5(3):371–376. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.137954.
  17. Gupta S, Mehendiratta M, Rehani S, et al. Age estimation in Indian children and adolescents in the NCR region of Haryana: a comparative study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2015;7(3):253–258. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.172453.
  18. Acharya AB. Age estimation in Indians using Demirjian's 8-teeth method. J Forensic Sci 2011;56(1):124–127. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01566.x.
  19. Olze A, Schmeling A, Taniguchi M, et al. Forensic age estimation in living subjects: the ethnic factor in wisdom tooth mineralization. Int J Legal Med 2004;118(3):170–173. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-004-0434-7.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.