International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year

Ahmed M Hassan, Shukry G Mohammed

Keywords : Children, Pit and fissure, Retention, Sealant

Citation Information : Hassan AM, Mohammed SG. Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019; 12 (2):96-100.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1600

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-09-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the retention rate and pattern of different pit and fissure sealants placed on the occlusal surface of newly erupted first permanent molars after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Materials and methods: Seventy children were enrolled in this study. They divided into seven groups (m = 10) according to the type of the sealant. The four permanent first molars of each child were sealed. The sealant was applied according to the instructions from the manufacturer. A clinical evaluation was carried out at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The clinical observations were divided into three categories: total retention (TR), partial retention (PR), and total loss (TL). Results: The resin-based sealant performed better than the glass ionomer-based sealant except for the Ketac Molar Easymix. At 3 months, there was no significant difference among all the tested groups (p > 0.05), while at 6, 9, and 12 months, there was a highly significant difference (p < 0.001). The glass carbomer sealant showed the least retention rate at all intervals. Conclusion: With an exception of the Ketac Molar Easymix, resin-based sealers performed better than glass ionomer-based sealers. Clinical significance: A proper application of pit and fissure sealant will decrease the chance for caries development in newly erupted teeth.


PDF Share
  1. Bhushan U, Goswami M. Evaluation of retention of pit and fissure sealants placed with and without air abrasion pretreatment in 6–8 year old children—an in vivo study. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9:e211–e217. DOI: 10.4317/jced.53259.
  2. Chi DL, van der Goes DN, et al. Cost-effectiveness of pit-and-fissure sealants on primary molars in medicaid-enrolled children. Am J Public Health 2014;104:555–561. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301588.
  3. Prabhakar A, Dahake PT, et al. Fluoride: is it worth to be added in pit and fissure sealants? Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012;5:1–5. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1125.
  4. Pushpalatha HM, Ravichandra KS, et al. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of different pit and fissure sealants in primary and permanent teeth—an in vitro study. J Int Oral 2014;6:84–89.
  5. Nogourani MK, Janghorbani M, et al. A 12-month clinical evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with and without etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in newly-erupted teeth. J Appl oral Sci 2012;20:352–356. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572012000300010.
  6. Eskandarian T, Baghi S, et al. Comparison of clinical success of applying a kind of fissure sealant on the lower permanent molar teeth in dry and wet conditions. J Dent (Shiraz) 2015;16:162–168.
  7. Chen X, Du M, et al. Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1443–1450. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0633-9.
  8. Pérez-Lajarín L, Cortés-Lillo O, et al. Marginal microleakage of two fissure sealants: a comparative study. J Dent Child 2003;70:24–28.
  9. Kumaran P. Clinical evaluation of the retention of different pit and fissure sealants: a 1 year study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;6:183–187. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1215.
  10. Reddy VR, Chowdhary N, et al. Retention of resin-based filled and unfilled pit and fissure sealants: a comparative clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent 2015;6:18–23. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.152932.
  11. Babaji P, Vaid S, et al. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of different pit and fissure sealants. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2016;6:111–115. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0762.184038.
  12. Ninawe N, Ullal NA, et al. A 1 year clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on permanent first molars. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;3:54–59. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.94547.
  13. Bhat PK, Konde S, et al. Moisture-tolerant resin-based sealant: a boon. Contemp Clin Dent 2013;4:343–348. DOI: 10.4103/0976- 237X.118394.
  14. Sridhar LP, Moses J, et al. Comparative evaluation of the marginal sealing ability of two commercially available pit and fissure sealants. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:1–4. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19996.8413.
  15. Fatima N. Influence of extended light exposure curing times on the degree of conversion of resin-based pit and fissure sealant materials. Saudi Dent J 2014;26:151–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.05.002.
  16. Papacchini F, Cury AH, et al. Noninvasive pit and fissure sealing: microtensile bond strength to intact bovine enamel of different pit and fissure sealants in a simplified fissure model. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:375–380.
  17. Joshi K, Dave B, et al. Comparative evaluation of two different pit & fissure sealants and a restorative material to check their microleakage—an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2013;5:35–39.
  18. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Validity of sealant retention as surrogate for caries prevention—a systematic review. PLoS One 2013;8:77103. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077103.
  19. Galo R, Contente MMMG, et al. Wear of two pit and fissure sealants in contact with primary teeth. Eur J Dent 2014;8:241–248. DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.130619.
  20. Singla T, Pandit IK, et al. An evaluation of microleakage of various glass ionomer based restorative materials in deciduous and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. Saudi Dent J 2012;24:35–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2011.10.002.
  21. Bayrak S, Tunc ES, et al. Fluoride release and recharge from different materials used as fissure sealants. Eur J Dent 2010;4:245–250.
  22. Cehreli SB, Tirali RE, et al. Microleakage of newly developed glass carbomer cement in primary teeth. Eur J Dent 2013;7:15–21.
  23. Hu X, Zhang W, et al. Frequency of remnants of sealants left behind in pits and fissures of occlusal surfaces after 2 and 3 years. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:143–149. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1766-7.
  24. Fernandes KS, Chalakkal P, et al. A comparison between three different pit and fissure sealants with regard to marginal integrity. J Conserv Dent 2012;15:146–150. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.94588.
  25. Versluis A, Douglas WH, et al. Thermal expansion coefficient of dental composites measured with strain gauges. Dent Mater 1996;12: 290–294.
  26. Veiga NJ, Pereira CM, et al. Prevalence of dental caries and fissure sealants in a Portuguese sample of adolescents. PLoS One 2015;10:e0121299. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121299.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.