Citation Information :
Jayaraj D, Ganesan S. Salivary pH and Buffering Capacity as Risk Markers for Early Childhood Caries: A Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 8 (3):167-171.
Background: The diagnostic utility of saliva is currently being explored in various branches of dentistry, remarkably in the field of caries research. This study was aimed to determine if assessment of salivary pH and buffering capacity would serve as reliable tools in risk prediction of early childhood caries (ECC).
Materials and methods: Paraffin-stimulated salivary samples were collected from 50 children with ECC (group I) and 50 caries free children (group II). Salivary pH and buffering capacity (by titration with 0.1 N hydrochloric acid) were assessed using a handheld digital pH meter in both groups. The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis.
Results: Statistically, no significant difference was observed between both the groups for all salivary parameters assessed, except for the buffering capacity level at 150 μl titration of 0.1 N hydrochloric acid (p = 0.73; significant at 1% level).
Conclusion: Salivary pH and buffering capacity may not serve as reliable markers for risk prediction of ECC.
How to cite this article: Jayaraj D, Ganesan S. Salivary pH and Buffering Capacity as Risk Markers for Early Childhood Caries: A Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;8(3):167-171.
Definition of Early Childhood Caries (ECC). Pediatr Dent 2006; 28(7):13. Reference manual.
McDonald RE, Avery DR, Stookey GK. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co; 2005, Dental caries in the child and adolescent, p. 203-235.
Seow WK. Biological mechanisms of early childhood caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26(suppl 1):8-27.
Vitorino R, Calheiros-Lobo MJ, Duarte JA, Domingues P, Amado F. Salivary clinical data and dental caries susceptibility: is there a relationship? Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol 2006;47(1):27-33.
Wyne AH. Early childhood caries: nomenclature and case definition. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27(5): 313-315.
Moritsuka M, Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Ikeda M, Tagami J. The pH change after HCl titration into resting and stimulated saliva for a buffering capacity test. Aust Dent J 2006;51(2): 170-174.
Horowitz HS. Research issues in early childhood caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26(1 suppl):67-81.
Ben-Aryeh H, Fisher M, Szargel R, Laufer D. Composition of whole unstimulated saliva of healthy children: changes with age. Arch Oral Biol 1990;35(11):929-931.
Schipper RG, Silletti E, Vingerhoeds MH. Saliva as research material: Biochemical, physicochemical and practical aspects. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52(12):1114-1135.
Lamberts BL, Pederson ED, Shklair IL. Salivary pH-rise activities in caries-free and caries-active naval recruits. Arch Oral Biol 1983;28(7):605-608.
Ericson T, Makinen KK. Textbook of clinical cariology. Copenhagen: Munksgard; 1986. Saliva formation, composition and possible role, 28-45.
Newbrun E. Cariology. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 1989. Current concepts of caries etiology, p. 29-61.
Gopinath VK, Arzreanne AR. Saliva as a diagnostic tool for assessment of dental caries. Arch Orofac Sci 2006;1(1):57-59.
Surdiloviæ D, Stojanoviæ I, Apostoloviæ M. Caries risk estimation in children regarding values of saliva buffer system components and carboanhydrase activity. Vojnosanit Pregl 2008;65(9):676-680.
Tenovuo J. Salivary parameters of relevance for assessing caries activity in individuals and populations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25(1):82-86.
Axelsson P. Diagnosis and risk prediction of dental caries. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc; 2000. Internal modifying factors involved in dental caries. p. 91-150.
