Citation Information :
Shahi P, Sood P, Madan M, Shahi N. Comparative Study of Pulp Vitality in Primary and Young Permanent Molars in Human Children with Pulse Oximeter and Electric Pulp Tester. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 8 (2):94-98.
Aim and objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the pulp testing methods (pulse oximetry and electric pulp test) in primary and young permanent teeth of children.
Materials and methods: The study included a total of 155 children aged 4 to 15 years. Twenty children formed control group I. Study group included all healthy, 85 primary 2nd molars in group II and 85 permanent 1st molars in group III. Fifty children needing endodontics treatment formed test group IV. The readings were recorded as true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN), false negative (FN). Based on this, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated for each method. The results were statistically analyzed using Chi-square test.
Results: On comparing pulse oximetry with electric pulp test ‘p-value’ was found to be 0.487 and 1.00 for groups 1 and 2 respectively and was statistically not significant. Whereas ‘p-value’ for groups 3 and 4 was < 0.0001 and 0.003 respectively and was statistically highly significant.
Conclusion: The present study indicates that pulse oximetry can be used as a routine method for assessing the pulp vitality in primary, young permanent and mature permanent teeth.
How to cite this article: Shahi P, Sood PB, Sharma A, Madan M, Shahi N, Gandhi G. Comparative Study of Pulp Vitality in Primary and Young Permanent Molars in Human Children with Pulse Oximeter and Electric Pulp Tester. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;8(2):94-98.
Gopikrishna V, Tinagupta K, Kandaswamy D. Evaluation of efficacy of a new custom-made pulse oximeter dental probe in comparison with the electrical and thermal tests for assessing pulp vitality. J Endod 2007;33(4):411-414.
Samraj RV, Indra R, Srinivasan MR, Kumar A. Recent advances in pulp vitality testing. Endodontology 2003;15(1): 14-19.
Kolbinson DA, Teplitsky PE. Electric pulp testing with examination gloves. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988; 65(1):122-126.
Bhaskar SN, Rappaport HW. Dental vitality tests and pulp status. J Am Dent Assoc 1973;86(2):409-411.
Degering CI. Physiologic evaluation of dental-pulp testing methods. J Dent Res 1962;41(3):695-700.
Reynolds RL. The determination of pulp vitality by means of thermal and electrical stimuli. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966;22(2):231-240.
Petersson K, Soderstrom C, Kiani-Anaraki M, Levy G. Evaluation of the ability of thermal and electrical tests to register pulp vitality. Endod Dent Traum 1999;15(3):127-131.
Goho C. Pulse oximetry evaluation of vitality in primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 1999;21(2): 125-127.
Gopikrishna V, Kandaswamy D, Tinagupta. Assessment of the efficacy of an indigenously developed pulse oximeter dental sensor holder for pulp vitality testing. Ind J Dent Res 2006;17(3):111-113.
Calil E, Caldeira CL, Gavini G, Lemos EM. Determination of pulp vitality in vivo with pulse oximetry. Int Endod J 2008; 41(9):741-746.
Gopikrishna V, Tinagupta, Kandaswamy D. Comparison of electrical, thermal and pulse oximetry methods for assessing pulp vitality in recently traumatized teeth. J Endod 2007; 33(5):531-534.
Kahan RS, Gulabivala K, Snook M, Setechell DJ. Evaluation of a pulse oximeter and customized probe for pulp vitality testing. J Endod 1996;22(3):105-109.
Johnsen DC, Harshbarger J, Rymer HD. Quantitative assessment of neural development in human premolars. Anat Rec 1983;205(4):421-429.
Chen E, Abbott PV. Dental pulp testing: a review. Int J Dent 2009;1-12.
Gopikrishna V, Pradeep G, Venkateshbabu N. Assessment of pulp vitality: a review. Int J Paedtr Dent 2009;19(1):3-15.
Shender O, Shora S, Siddiqui S, Tchaouchev N, Termei R, Terzioglu U, Toor N, Vishwanath S. How helpful are diagnostic tests for pulp conditions? 2007;1-15.