International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Etching by the Total Etch and Self-etch Dentin Bonding Systems in the Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study

Sajjad Hasim Mithiborwala, Vishwas Chaugule, Manohar Poojari, Prashant Pujari, Thejokrishna Pammi

Keywords : Interfacial morphology, Total etch systems, Self-etch systems, Etching pattern

Citation Information : Mithiborwala SH, Chaugule V, Poojari M, Pujari P, Pammi T. A Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Etching by the Total Etch and Self-etch Dentin Bonding Systems in the Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 8 (1):30-36.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1279

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Abstract

Objective: Early childhood caries is now affecting the children in dangerous proportions. There is a wide spread loss of the tooth material irrespective of the type of the carious lesion. Restoration of such lesions with a strong permanent bond between the dental tissues and the restorative dental materials would be a highly desirable requisite. Ultramorphological characterizations show that the interfacial morphology and the chemical characterization of the bonding systems appear to be strongly associated with each other and, therefore, observing and understanding the interfacial phenomenon and its quality would be of great importance in the selection of a dental adhesive for its use in pediatric restorative dentistry. Study design: Human primary molars, which were indicated for extraction, for an array of reasons like caries, normal exfoliation, pathological root resorption, over-retained and serial extraction, were collected for the study purpose. Total number of teeth was then equally distributed into two subgroups, each namely A1 (Prime and Bond NT) and A2 (Xeno III). Results: The type of etching pattern that was observed in group A1 (Prime and Bond NT) of Silverstone's type II compared to the Silverstone's type III observed in group A2 (Xeno III). Conclusion: Results of this study indicate that the use of an etchant separately followed by the application of the bonding system—Prime and Bond NT—would provide a better quality of adhesion thus improving the quality and longevity of the restoration done within the limits of enamel in primary dentition. How to cite this article: Mithiborwala SH, Chaugule V, Katge F, Poojari M, Pujari P, Pammi T. A Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Etching by the Total Etch and Self-etch Dentin Bonding Systems in the Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;8(1):30-36.


PDF Share
  1. Vargas CM, Crall JJ, Schneider DA. Sociodemographic distribution of pediatric dental caries: NHANES III, 1988-1994. J Am Dent Assoc 1998 Sep;129(9):1229-1238.
  2. National Institute of Dental Research. Oral health of the United States children: the National Survey of Dental Caries in US School Children: 1986-1987; National and regional findings. Bethesda, Marylan: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1989:3-9; NIH publication no. 89-2247.
  3. Rai B, Jain R, Kharb S, Anand SC. Dental caries and oral hygiene status of 8 to 12 year school children of Rohtak: a brief report. The Internet Journal of Dental Science 2007;5(1).
  4. Buonocore MG, Wileman WR, Brudevold F. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1954;33:694.
  5. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955 Dec;34(6):849-853.
  6. Gwinnett AJ, Buonocore MG. Adhesives and caries prevention: a preliminary report. Br Dent J 1965 July 20;119:77-81.
  7. Wendt L, Koch G, Birkhed D. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition. Swed Dent J 1998;22(4):149-155.
  8. Holland IS, Walls AW, Wallwork MA, Murray JJ. The longevity of amalgam restorations in deciduous molars. Brit Dent J 1986 Oct 11;161(7):255-258.
  9. Wong FSL, Day SJ. An investigation of factors influencing the longevity of restorations in primary molars. J Int Assoc Dent Child 1990 Jul;20(1):11-16.
  10. Qvist V, Thylstrup A, Mjör IA. Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odont Scand 1986 Dec;44(6):343-349.
  11. Edward J Swift. Bonding systems for restorative materials: a comprehensive review. Pediatric Dent 1998;20(2):80-84.
  12. Agostini FG, Koutsi V, Noonan RG, Horner JA, Simpson MD, Mathews WG, Pashtey DH. The effect of dentin depth on the permeability and ultrastructure of primary molars. Pediatric Dent 1994 Jan-Feb;16(1):29-35.
  13. Kaaden C, Powers J. Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2001 Nov-Dec;23(6):481-486.
  14. De Munck J, et al. One day bonding effectiveness of new self etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2005 Jan-Feb;30(1):39-49.
  15. Gillings B, Buonocore M. An investigation of enamel thickness in human lower incisor teeth. J Dent Res 1961 Jan-Feb; 40(1):105-118.
  16. Smutka S, Jedrychowski J, Caputo A. An evaluation of primary enamel pretreatments and their effects on resin retention. J Dent Res 1978 July-Aug;57(7-8):796-799.
  17. Ruddle CJ. Cleaning and shaping of the root canal system. In: Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the Pulp. 8th ed. Mosby Inc, Elsevier Publication: Missouri; 2002. p. 231-392.
  18. Spangberg L. Instruments, materials and devices. In: Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed. Mosby Inc, Elsevier Publication: Missouri; 2002. p. 521-572.
  19. Harrison JW, et al. J Endod 1978;4:6.
  20. Clarence, et al. Additional conservative and esthetic treatments. In: Sturdevant CM. The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 2nd ed. The CV Mosby Company, McGraw-Hill: Inc; 2000. p. 312-372.
  21. Silverstone LM, Saxton CA, Dogon IL, Fejerskov O. Variation in the pattern of acid etching of human dental enamel examined by scanning electron microscopy. Caries Res 1975; 9(5):373-387.
  22. Barnes IE. ‘The adaptation of composite resins to tooth structure: Parts 1-4: BDJ 1977;142: 122-129, 185-191, 253-259, 319-326.
  23. Walshaw R, McComb D. SEM evaluation of resin dentine interface with proprietary bonding agents in human subjects. J Dent Res 1994;73(5):1079-1087.
  24. Elkins CI, McCourt JW. Bond strength of dentinal adhesives in primary teeth. Quintessence Int 1993 Apr;24(4):271-273.
  25. Sundfeld, Valentino, Alexandre. Hybrid layer thickness and resin tag length of a self-etching adhesive bonded to sound dentin. J Dent 2005 Sept;33(8):675-681.
  26. Hosoya Y. The effect of acid-etching times on ground primary enamel. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1991 spring;15(3):188-194.
  27. Retief DH. Effect of conditioning the enamel surface with phosphoric acid. J Dent Res 1973 Mar-Apr;52(2):333-341.
  28. Chigira H, Koike T, Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Wakumoto S, Hyakawa T. Effect of the self etching dentin primers on bonding efficacy of dentine adhesive. Dent Mater J 1989 Jun; 8(1):86-92.
  29. Lopez C, Daniela, G, Nicholas W. Enamel acid etching: a review. Compendium 2007 Jan;28(1):18-25.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.