International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE S1 ( Special issue-1 (Pediatr Endodont), 2022 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Assessment of Four Obturation Methods in Deciduous Teeth Using Digital Radiography: An In Vivo Study

Srikanth S Raju, Rajendra E Reddy, Thabitha S Rani, Kiranmayi Merum, Srujana P Mudusu, Ajay M Tulluru

Keywords : Deciduous teeth, Obturation techniques, Quality of obturation, Vista scan, Voids

Citation Information :

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2132

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-02-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim and objective: This study was carried out to comparatively assess the efficiency of four methods of obturation viz Lentulo spiral, Navi tip syringe, Bi directional spiral, and Past inject carrier in deciduous teeth using vista scan. Materials and methods: A total sample of 100 primary root canals [4 groups of 25 canals each] with 2/3rd of root length were selected and randomly allocated into four different obturating techniques, i.e., Group I: Lentulo spiral, Group II: Navi tip syringe, Group III: Bi directional spiral, and Group IV: Past inject carrier. The quality of obturation [Coll and sadrain, 1996] and presence or absence of voids were evaluated by using Vista scan. The recorded data was statistically analyzed. Results: The highest mean rank value of optimally filled canals was obtained by Group IV [58.00] followed by Group I [50.00] with no significant difference. The highest mean rank value of under filled canals and over filled canals were obtained by Group III and Group II, respectively, and these results were statistically significant. All the four obturation techniques showed presence of voids with no significant difference. Conclusion: Both Lentulo spiral and Past inject carrier were equally efficient in attaining an optimally filled homogenous obturation in deciduous teeth.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Grover R, Mehra M, Pandit IK et al. Clinical efficacy of various root canal obturating methods in primary teeth: a comparative study. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2013;14(2):104–108.
  2. Mahajan N, Bansal A. Various Obturation methods used in deciduous teeth. Int J Med and Dent Sci 2015;4(1):708–713. DOI: 10.19056/ijmdsjssmes/2015/v4i1/79966
  3. Guelman M, McEachern M, Turner C. Pulpectomies in primary incisors using three delivery systems: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2004;28:323–326. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.28.4.j634167443m061n3
  4. Barr E S, Kleier D J, Nelle V. Barr Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000;22:77–78.
  5. Memarpour M, Shahidi S, Meshki R. Comparison of Different Obturation Techniques for Primary Molars by Digital RadiographyPediatric dentistry 2013;35(3):236-240.
  6. Bawazir OA, Salama FS. Clinical evaluation of root canal obturation methods in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2006; 28: 39–47.
  7. Kuo CI, Wang YL, Chang HH, et al. Application of Ni–Ti rotary files for pulpectomy in primary molars. J Dent Sci 2006; 1:10–15. DOI:10.30086/JDS.200603.0002
  8. Deveaux E, Dufour D, Boniface B. Five methods of calcium hydroxide intra canal placement: an in vitro evaluation. Oral surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oradiol Endod 2000;89(3):349–355. DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(00)70101-6
  9. Tan, J.M.E., Parolia, A. & Pau, A.K.H. Intracanal placement of calcium hydroxide: a comparison of specially designed paste carrier technique with other techniques. BMC Oral Health 13, 52 (2013). DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-52
  10. Walton RE, Torabinejad M. Principles and practice of endodontics. 3rd Edition. Saunders Company 2002:pp.222.
  11. Kumar LV, Sreelakshmi N, Reddy ER, et al Clinical Evaluation of Conventional Radiography, Radiovisiography, and an Electronic Apex Locator in Determining the Working Length in Primary Teeth. Pediatric dentistry 2016;38(1):37-41.
  12. Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, Mctigue DJ, et al. Pédiatrie Dentistry: Infancy through Adolescence. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 2005:375–390.
  13. Sogur E, Baksi BG, Grondahi HG. Imaging of root canal fillings: a comparison of subjective image quality between limited cone-beam CT, storage phosphor, and film radiography. Int Endod J 2007; 40:179–185. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01204.x
  14. McDonald R. Digital imaging for dentist. Aust Dent J 2001; 6:301–305. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2001.tb00295.x
  15. Paul F. Filmless imaging: the use of digital radiography in dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136:1379–1387. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0051
  16. Woolhiser GA, Brand JW, Hoen MM et al. Accuracy of film based digital and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination. Oral surg oral med oral pathol oral radiol endod 2005;99:499–504. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.07.024
  17. Peters CI, Koka RS, Highsmith S, et al. Calcium hydroxide dressings using different preparation and application modes: density and dissolution by simulated tissue pressure. Int Endod J 2005;38(12):889–895. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01035.x
  18. Singh R, Chaudhary S, Manuja N et al. evaluation of different root canal obturation methods in primary teeth using cone beam computerized tomography. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;39(5):462–469. DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.5.462
  19. Torres CP Apicella MJ, Yancich PP, et al. Intracanal placement of calcium hydroxide: a comparison of techniques, revisited. J Endod 2004;30:225–227. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200404000-00010
  20. Parikh A, Banga KS, Thakore A, Bi directional spiral compared to traditional sealer placement techniques. Endodontology 2000; 12(2):59–64.
  21. Wu Mk, Van Der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR. A 1 year follow up study on leakage of single cone fillings with roekorsa sealer. Oral surg, oral med, oral pathol, oral radiol & endod. 2006; 101(5):662–667 DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.03.013
  22. Oztan MD. Akman A, Dalat D. Intra canal placement of calcium hydroxide: a comparison of two different mixtures and carriers Oral surg, oral med, oral path, oral radiol and endod 2002; 94(1):93–97. DOI: 10.1067/moe.2002.124107
  23. Kahn FH, Rosenberg L, Schertzer G, et al. An in vitro evaluation of sealer placement methodsInt Endod J 1997;30:181–186. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1997.00061.x
  24. Reddy ER, Raju SS, Merum K, et al. Postgraduates’ Perspective of Pediatric Dental Chair: A Questionnaire Study Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(3):251–254. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1758
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.