International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2016 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Association of Dermatoglyphic Peculiarities with Dental Caries in Preschool Children of Lucknow, India

Ekta Singh, Sabyasachi Saha, GV Jagannath

Keywords : Dental caries, Dermatoglyphics, Fingerprint pattern, Preschool children

Citation Information : Singh E, Saha S, Jagannath G. Association of Dermatoglyphic Peculiarities with Dental Caries in Preschool Children of Lucknow, India. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016; 9 (1):39-44.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1331

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: Dermatoglyphics refers to study of the intricate dermal ridge configurations on the skin covering the palmar and plantar surfaces of hand and feet. The basis of considering dermatoglyphic patterns as genetic marker for dental caries is that the epithelium of finger buds as well as enamel has ectodermal origin, and both develop at the same time of intrauterine life. Aim: To assess the relationship between fingerprint patterns and dental caries among preschool children of Lucknow city. Study design: This study was of cross-sectional design. Materials and methods: The study group comprised 512 preschool children 2–6 years of age. The prevalence of caries was recorded using "Dentition status and treatment needs" (WHO basic oral health assessment form, 1997). They were divided into three groups as follows: Group I (dmft score = 0–2), group II (dmft score = 3–4) and group III (dmft score ≥5). The handprints of each child were taken using a stamp pad. The fingertip patterns were analyzed according to the classical method and were classified according to the topological method. The frequency of occurrence of type of dermatoglyphic pattern on fingertip of each digit was noted. Statistics: Chi-square test was used to test the significant difference in proportions. Means were compared using Student's t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) or F-test. Results: Subjects belonging to groups II and III showed maximum occurrence of whorl pattern on all digits. Group I subjects had maximum occurrence of arch pattern. All the variables had statistically significant value, with a degree of divergence of specific dermatoglyphic patterns among all three groups. Conclusion: The dental caries susceptibility of an individual increased with incidence of whorl pattern and it decreased with incidence of arch pattern. How to cite this article: Singh E, Saha S, Jagannath GV, Singh S, Saha S, Garg N. Association of Dermatoglyphic Peculiarities with Dental Caries in Preschool Children of Lucknow, India. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;9(1):39-44.


PDF Share
  1. Cummins H, Keith HH, Midlo C, Montgomery RB, Wilder HH, Wilder IW. Revised methods of interpretation and formulation of palmar dermatoglyphics. Am J Phys Anthropol 1929 Jan-Mar;12(3):415-502.
  2. Bhargava SS, Sathawane RS. Dermatoglyphics–exploring newer dimensions in diagnosis. Central India J Dent Sci 2012;3(2):126-132.
  3. Abhilash PR, Divyashree R, Patil SG, Gupta M, Chandrasekar T, Karthikeyan R. Dermatoglyphics in patients with dental caries: a study on 1250 individuals. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012 May 1;13(3):266-274.
  4. Nidhi M, Arun R, Neeti B. Palmistry: a tool for dental caries prediction. Indian J Dent Res 2011 Mar-Apr;22(2):213-218.
  5. Galton F. Fingerprints. Macmillan and Co.; 1992. p. 64-65.
  6. Sharma A, Somani R. Dermatoglyphic interpretation of dental caries and its correlation to salivary bacteria interactions: an in vivo Study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2009 Mar;27(1):17-21.
  7. Hassel TM, Harris EL. Genetic influences in caries and periodontal diseases. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1995;6(4):319-342.
  8. Bretz WA, Schork NJ, Robinson MT, Coelho M, Costa S, Melo Filho MR, Weyant RJ, Hart TC. Longitudinal analysis of heritability for dental caries traits. J Dent Res 2005 Nov;84(11): 1047-1051.
  9. Mulvihill JJ, Smith DW. The genesis of dermatoglyphics. J Pediatr 1969 Oct;75(4):579-589.
  10. Popich GA, Smith DW. The genesis and significance of digital and palmar hand creases, preliminary report. J Pediatr 1970 Dec;77(6):1017-1023.
  11. History of Dematoglyphics. Available at: Fingerprints.net.com
  12. Penrose LS. Dermatoglyphic topology. Nature 1965 Feb 6;205(6): 544-546.
  13. Walkers NF. The use of dermal configurations in the diagnosis of mongolism. J Pediatr 1957 Jan;50(1):19-26.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.