International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2015 ) > List of Articles


Effect of One Percent Chlorhexidine Addition on the Antibacterial Activity and Mechanical Properties of Sealants: An in vitro Study

Arunachalam Karthikeyan Shanmugaavel, J Baby John, PR Geetha Priya, Jagadeesan Gnana Devi

Keywords : Antibacterial activity, Chlorhexidine, Pit and fissure sealants

Citation Information : Shanmugaavel AK, John JB, Priya PG, Devi JG. Effect of One Percent Chlorhexidine Addition on the Antibacterial Activity and Mechanical Properties of Sealants: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 8 (3):196-201.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1312

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of addition of 1% chlorhexidine digluconate solution on the antibacterial activity and mechanical properties of glass ionomer and resin based sealant. Materials and methods: Conventional glass ionomer sealant (GIS) (Fuji VII, Japan) and resin sealant (Clinpro 3M ESPE, USA) were used in this study. Chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) (20%) liquid was added to both the sealants, and the concentration of chlorhexidine in sealants was adjusted to 1%. The sealants were divided into four groups as: group A (GIS), group B (GIS + 1% CHX), group C (resin sealant), group D (resin sealant + 1% CHX). Five cylindrical specimens were prepared in each group. Their antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus, and their mechanical properties (compressive strength and diametrical tensile strength) were assessed. Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used appropriately for statistical analysis (SPSS version 19). Result: Addition of one percent chlorhexidine significantly increased the antibacterial activity of both the sealants. There was a significant difference between groups A and B (p < 0.009), and groups C and D (p < 0.008). There was no significant difference in the mechanical properties of the sealants. Conclusion: Addition of one percent chlorhexidine to the glass ionomer and resin based sealants provided sufficient antibacterial activity, without significantly affecting the mechanical property of the sealants. How to cite this article: Shanmugaavel AK, Asokan S, John JB, Geetha Priya PR, Gnana Devi J. Effect of one percent Chlorhexidine Addition on the Antibacterial Activity and Mechanical Properties of Sealants: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;8(3):196-201.

PDF Share
  1. Beauchamp J, C aufield P W, C rall J J, D only K J, F eigal R, Gooch B, Ismail A, Kohn W, Siegal M, Simonsen R, et al. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139(3):257-268.
  2. Jedrychowski JR, Caputo AA, Kerper S. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of restorative materials combined with chlorhexidines. J Oral Rehabil 1983;10(5):373-381.
  3. Deepalakshmi M, Poorni S, Miglani R, Rajamani I, Ramachandran S. Evaluation of the antibacterial and physical properties of glass ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine and cetrimide: an in vitro study. Ind J Dent Res 2010;21(4):552-556.
  4. Turkun LS, Turkun M, Ertugrul F, Ateş M, Brugger S. Long-term antibacterial effects and physical properties of a chlorhexidine containing glass ionomer cement. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008;20(1):29-44.
  5. de Castilho AR, Duque C, Negrini Tde C, Sacono NT, de Paula AB, de Souza Costa CA, Spolidório DM, Puppin- Rontani RM. In vitro and in vivo investigation of the biological and mechanical behaviour of resin-modified glass-ionomer-cement containing chlorhexidine. J Dent 2013;41(2):155-163.
  6. Takemura K, Sakamoto Y, Staninec M, Kobayashi S, Suehiro K, Tsuchitani Y. Antibacterial activity of a bis-GMA based composite resin and antibacterial effect of chlorhexidine incorporation. Jpn J Conserv Dent 1983;26(4):540-547.
  7. Bohannan HM. Caries distribution and the case for sealants. J Public Health Dent 1983;43(3):200-204.
  8. Karlzen-Reuterving G, van Dijken JW. A 3-year follow-up of glass ionomer cement and resin fissure sealants. ASDC J Dent Child 1995;62(2):108-110.
  9. Grewal N, Chopra R. The effect of fissure morphology and eruption time on penetration and adaptation of pit and fissure sealants: An SEM study. J Ind Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2008;26(2):59-63.
  10. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Wright GZ, Braverman I. Microleakage of sealants after conventional, bur, and air abrasion preparation of pits and fissures. Pediatr Dent 1998;20(3):173-176.
  11. McCue RW, McDougal FG, Shay DE. The antibacterial properties of some dental restorative materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1951 Sep;4(9):1180-1184.
  12. Herrera M, Castillo A, Baca P, Carrion P. Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer restorative cements exposed to cavity producing microorganisms. Oper Dent 1999;24(5):286-291.
  13. Naorungroj S, Wei HH, Arnold RR, Swift EJ, Walter R. Antibacterial surface properties of fluoride containing resin based sealants. J Dent 2010;38(5):387-391.
  14. Matalon S, Peretz B, Sidon R, Weiss EI, Slutzky H. Antibacterial properties of pit and fissure sealants combined with daily fluoride mouth rinse. Pediatr Dent 2010;32(1):9-13.
  15. Imazato S. Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2003;19(6):449-457.
  16. Addy M. In vitro studies into the use of denture base and soft liner materials as carriers for drugs in the mouth. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8(2):131-142.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.