International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of Effectiveness of Manual Orthodontic, Powered and Sonic Toothbrushes on Oral Hygiene of Fixed Orthodontic Patients

Ruchi Sharma, Mridula Trehan, Sunil Sharma, Vikas Jharwal, Nidhi Rathore

Keywords : Manual orthodontic toothbrush, Oral hygiene, Powered toothbrush, Sonic toothbrush,Fixed orthodontic treatment

Citation Information : Sharma R, Trehan M, Sharma S, Jharwal V, Rathore N. Comparison of Effectiveness of Manual Orthodontic, Powered and Sonic Toothbrushes on Oral Hygiene of Fixed Orthodontic Patients. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 8 (3):181-189.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1310

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-12-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction: Maintenance of good oral hygiene is important for patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a manual orthodontic toothbrush, powered toothbrush with oscillating head and sonic toothbrush in controlling plaque, gingivitis and interdental bleeding in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment, and to compare their relative efficacy. Materials and methods: Sixty subjects, who were to receive orthodontic treatment with both upper and lower fixed appliances, were randomly divided into three study groups, with 20 patients in each group. Groups I to III were given manual orthodontic, powered and sonic toothbrushes, respectively. Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI) and interdental bleeding index were scored to assess the level of plaque accumulation, gingival health and interdental bleeding at baseline; 4 and 8 weeks recall visits after fixed appliance bonding. Paired t-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were used for intragroup and intergroup comparisons. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: This study showed that a significant reduction in all the three indices scores was found from baseline to 4 and 8 weeks in group III. On intergroup comparison, no statistically significant differences were detected between the three groups for any of the parameters assessed. Conclusion: On intragroup comparison, sonic brushes performed superiorly in reducing gingivitis, plaque and interdental bleeding as compared to the manual orthodontic and powered brushes. On intergroup comparison, the relative comparative effectiveness was found to be similar for all the three brushes. How to cite this article: Sharma R, Trehan M, Sharma S, Jharwal V, Rathore N. Comparison of Effectiveness of Manual Orthodontic, Powered and Sonic Toothbrushes on Oral Hygiene of Fixed Orthodontic Patients. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;8(3):181-189.


PDF Share
  1. Rafe Z, Vardimon A, Ashkenazic M. Comparative study of 3 types of toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;130(1):92-95.
  2. Demling A, Heuer W, Elter C, Heidenblut T, Bach FW, Schwestka-Polly R, Stiesch-Scholz M. Analysis of supra- and subgingival long-term biofilm formation on orthodontic bands. Eur J Orthod 2009;31(2):202-206.
  3. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982; 81(2):93-98.
  4. Mizrahi E. Enamel demineralization following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1982;82(1):62-67.
  5. Hickman J, Millett DT, Sander L, Brown E, Love J. Powered versus manual toothbrushing in fixed appliance patients: a short-term randomized controlled clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2002;72(2):135-140.
  6. Womack WR, Guay AH. Comparative cleansing efficiency of electric and a manual toothbrush in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 1968;38(3):256-267.
  7. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-135.
  8. Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963;21:533-551.
  9. Caton JG, Polson AM. The interdental bleeding index: a simplified procedure for monitoring gingival health. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1985;6(2):88-90.
  10. Williams P, Clerehugh V, Worthington HV, Shaw WC. Comparison of two plaque indices for use in fixed orthodontic appliance patients. J Dent Res 1991;70:703.
  11. Grossman E, Dembling W, Proskin HM. A comparative clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a sonic toothbrush. J Clin Dent 1995;6(1):108-112.
  12. Costa MR, Silva VC, Miqui MN, Sakima T, Spolidorio DM, Cirelli JA. Efficacy of ultrasonic, electric and manual toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Angle Orthod 2007;77(2):361-366.
  13. Thienpont V, Dermaut LR, Van Maele G. Comparative study of 2 electric and 2 manual toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod and Dentofac Orthop 2001;120(4):353-360.
  14. Heintze SD, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Loundos J. Effectiveness of three different types of electric toothbrushes compared with a manual technique in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;110(6):630-638.
  15. Nathoo S, Mankodi S, Mateo LR, Chaknis P, Panagakos F. A clinical study comparing the supragingival plaque and gingivitis efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to a commercially available manual flat-trim toothbrush. J Clin Dent 2012;23 Spec no. A: A11-A16.
  16. D'costa K, Dana R, IP G, Kong E, Vol I. Electric versus manual toothbrushes in the fixed orthodontic patient: an evidencebased review. Available from: http://www.dentistry. utoronto.ca/system/files/x1_2011.pdf
  17. Robinson P, Deacon SA, Deery C, Heanue M, Walmsley AD, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Shaw BC. Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD002281.
  18. Wilcoxon DB, Ackerman RJ Jr, Killoy WJ, Love JW, Sakumura JS, Tira DE. The effectiveness of a counter rotational-action power toothbrush on plaque control in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991;99(1):7-14.
  19. Boyd RL, Rose CM. Effect of rotary electric toothbrush versus manual toothbrush on decalcification during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994;105(5):450-456.
  20. Trombeli L, Scabbia A, Griselli A, Zangari F, Calura G. Clinical evaluation of plaque removal by counter rotational electric toothbrush in orthodontic patients. Quintessence Int 1995;26(3):199-202.
  21. Silvestrini Biavati A, Gastaldo L, Dessi M, Silvestrini Biavati F, Migliorati M. Manual orthodontic vs. oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush in orthodontic patients: a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2010 Dec;11(4):200-202.
  22. Ousehal L, Lazrak L, Es-Said R, Hamdoune H, Elquars F, Khadija A. Evaluation of dental plaque control in patients wearing fixed orthodontic appliances: a clinical study. Int Orthod 2011 Mar;9(1):140-155.
  23. Kaklamanos EG, Kalfas S. Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of powered toothbrushes for orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2008;133(2):187.e1-14.
  24. Borutta A, Pala E, Fischer T. Effectiveness of a powered toothbrush compared with a manual toothbrush for orthodontic patients with fixed appliances. J Clin Dent 2002; 13(4):131-137.
  25. Sicilia A, Arregui I, Gallego M, Cabezas B, Cuesta S. Home Oral Hygiene Revisited, Options and evidence. Oral Health Prev Dent 2003;1 Suppl 1:407-422.
  26. Van der Weijden FA, Campbell SL, Dorfer CE, Gonzalez- Cabezas C, Slot DE. Safety of oscillating-rotating powered brushes compared to manual toothbrushes: a systematic review. J Periodontol 2011;82(1):5-24.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.