Citation Information :
Gupta A, Yelluri RK, Munshi A. Fiber-reinforced Composite Resin Bridge: A Treatment Option in Children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 8 (1):62-65.
A number of treatment options, ranging from Maryland bridges to implants, are available for the replacement of congenitally or traumatically missing permanent anterior teeth. But, there are several limitations of these therapeutic options when they have to be used before the completion of the growth, particularly in children. Reinforcement of composite resins with polyethylene fibers significantly improves their mechanical properties. Fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) bridge can offer a good alternative to conventional treatment options in replacing a missing permanent anterior tooth until a more definitive prosthesis can be provided at the end of the growth period. The purpose of this article is to present a clinical case of a single tooth replacement utilizing noninvasive and metal free fixed FRC bridge in a 13 years old child as an interim treatment option.
How to cite this article: Gupta A, Yelluri RK, Munshi AK. Fiber-reinforced Composite Resin Bridge: A Treatment Option in Children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;8(1):62-65.
Andreasen JO, Borum MK, Jacobson HL, Andreasen FM. Replantation of 400 avulsed permanent incisors. 1. Diagnosis of healing complications. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995;11(2): 51-58.
Finn SB. Clinical Pedodontics. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2004. p. 224-270.
Pinkham JR. Pediatric dentistry: Infancy through adolescence. 4th ed. Missouri: Elsevier; 2005. p. 341-374.
Olin PS, Hill EM, Donahue JL. Clinical evaluation of resinbonded bridges: a retrospective study. Quintessence Int 1999; 22(11):873-878.
Berekally TL, Smales RJ. A retrospective clinical evaluation of resin-bonded bridges inserted at the Adelaide Dental Hospital. Aust Dent J 1993;38(2):85-96.
Chafaie A, Portier R. Anterior fiber reinforced composite resin bridge: a case report. Pediatr Dent 2004;26(6): 530-534.
Thilander B, Odman J, Lekholm U. Orthodontic aspects of the use of oral implants in adolescents: a 10-year follow-up study. Eur J Orthod 2001;23(6):715-731.
Westwood RM, Duncan JM. Implants in adolescents: a literature review and case reports. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11(6):750-755.
Ganesh M, Tandon S. Versatility of ribbond in contemporary dental practice. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2006;20(1):53-58.
Tuloglu N, Bayrak S, Tunc ES. Different clinical applications of bondable reinforcement ribbond in pediatric dentistry. Eur J Dent 2009;3(4):329-334.
Rudo DN, Karbhari VM. Physical behaviors of fiberreinforcement as applied to tooth stabilization. Dent Clin North Am 1999;43(1):7-35.
Issac DH. Engineering aspects of the structure and properties of polymer-fiber composites: proceedings of the first symposium on fiber-reinforced plastics in dentistry. J Dent 2000 Aug;1989(2729):1-2.
Ramakrishna Y, Munshi AK. Fiber reinforced composite loop space maintainer: an alternative to the conventional band and loop. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;3(Suppl 1):265-285.
Gordon JE. The new science of strong materials. Princeton, NJ: Harmondsworth Penguin; 1976.
Unlu N, Belli S. Three-year clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures using prefabricated pontics. J Adhes Dent 2006;8(8):183-188.
Freilich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan JP, Eckorte KA, Goldberg AJ. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced fixed bridges. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;133(11):1523-1534.