International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2015 ) > List of Articles


Methods of Intracanal Reinforcement in Primary Anterior Teeth—Assessing the Outcomes through a Systematic Literature Review

Neeti Mittal, Hind Pal Bhatia

Keywords : Evidence, Intracanal reinforcement, Posts, Primary teeth, Restorations

Citation Information : Mittal N, Bhatia HP. Methods of Intracanal Reinforcement in Primary Anterior Teeth—Assessing the Outcomes through a Systematic Literature Review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 8 (1):48-54.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1282

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Aim: To assess how the various methods of intracanal reinforcement (short root canal posts) performed in their clinical and radiographic outcomes for restoring grossly broken down primary anterior teeth after pulpectomy for 1 year or longer follow-up period. Materials and methods: Literature search of electronic databases (Sept 2013) and various journals (1980-Sept 2013) using medical subject headings and free text terms was conducted. For inclusion in quality assessment, prespecified inclusion criteria were applied. Quality assessment was performed by using ‘The Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias’. Results: Seven relevant papers were selected for full text evaluation. After applying the inclusion criteria, only two trials could be considered for quality assessment. Both of these were classified as having high risk of bias. Conclusion: The evidence to support any method of intracanal reinforcement for restoring grossly broken down anterior teeth is presently lacking. Further trials with well-defined methodology are needed. How to cite this article: Mittal N, Bhatia HP, Haider K. Methods of Intracanal Reinforcement in Primary Anterior Teeth— Assessing the Outcomes through a Systematic Literature Review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;8(1):48-54.

PDF Share
  1. Lauris JR, da Silva Bastos R, de Magalhaes Bastos JR. Decline in dental caries among 12-year-old children in Brazil, 1980-2005. Int Dent J 2012;62(6):308-314.
  2. Marthaler TM. Changes in dental caries 1953-2003. Caries Res 2004;38(3):173-181.
  3. Goyal A, Gauba K, Chawla HS, Kaur M, Kapur A. Epidemiology of dental caries in Chandigarh school children and trends over the last 25 years. J Ind Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2007;25(3):115-118.
  4. Mendes FM, De Benedetto MS, Zardetto CGC, Wanderley MT, Correa MSNP. Resin composite restoration in primary anterior teeth using short-post technique and strip crowns: A case report. Quintessence Int 2004;35(9):689-692.
  5. Judd PL, Kenny JD, Johnston DH, Yacobi R. Composite resin short-post technique for primary anterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120(5):553-555.
  6. Mortada A, King NM. A simplified technique for the restoration of severely mutilated primary anterior teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2004;28(3):187-192.
  7. Usha M, Deepak V, Venkat S, Gargi M. Treatment of severely mutilated increases: A challenge to the pedodontist. J Ind Soc Pedodon Prev Dent 2007;25(suppl):34-37.
  8. Grewal N, Seth R. Comparative in vivo evaluation of restoring severely mutilated primary anterior teeth with biological post and crown preparation and reinforced composite restoration. J Ind Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2008;26(4):141-148.
  9. Subramaniam P, Babu KL, Sunny R. Glass fiber reinforced composite resin as an intracanal post—a clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;32(3):207-210.
  10. Aminabadi NA, Farahani ZRM. The efficacy of a modified omega wire extension for the treatment of severely damaged primary anterior teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2009;33(4):283-288.
  11. Wanderley MT, Ferreira SL, Rodrigues CR, Rodrigues Filho LE. Primary anterior tooth restoration using posts with macroretentive elements. Quintessence Int 1999;30(6):432-436.
  12. Motisuki C, Santos-Pinto L, Giro EMA. Restoration of severely decayed primary incisors using indirect composite resin restoration technique. Int J Peditr Dent 2005;15(4):282-286.
  13. Metha D, Gulati A, Basappa N; Raju OS. Esthetic rehabilitation of severely decayed primary incisors using glass fiber reinforced composite: a case report pp. J Dent Child 2012;79(1):22-25.
  14. Verma L, Passi S. Glass fibre-reinforced composite post and core used in decayed primary anteriorteeth: a case report. Case Rep Dent 2011;2011:864254.
  15. Sharaf AA. The application of fiber core posts in restoring badly destroyed primary incisors. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002; 26(3):217-224.
  16. Viera CL, Ribeiro CC. Polyethylene fiber tape used as a post and core in decayed primary anterior teeth: a treatment option. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2001;26(1):1-4.
  17. Rocha RO, das Neves LT, Marotti NR, Wanderley MT, Correa MS. Intracanal reinforcement fiber in pediatric dentistry: a case report. Quintessence Int 2004;35(4):263-268.
  18. Bayrak S, Tunc ES, Tuloglu N. Polyethylene fiber-reinforced composite resin used as a short post in severely decayed primary anterior teeth: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107(5):e60-e64.
  19. Jain M, Singla S, Bhushan B, Kumar S, Bhushan A. Esthetic rehabilitation of anterior primary teeth using polyethylene fiber with two different approaches. J Ind Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011;29(4):327-332.
  20. Chaudhary V, Shrivastava B, Bhatia HP, Aggarwal A, Singh AK, Gupta N. Multifunctional Ribbond—a versatile tool. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012;36(4):325-328.
  21. Memarpour M, Shafiei F. Restoration of primary anterior teeth using intracanal polyethylene fibers and composite: an in vivo study. J Adhes Dent 2013;15(1):85-91.
  22. Eshghi A, Esfahan RK, Khoroushi M. A simple method for reconstruction of severely damaged primary anterior teeth. Dent Res J 2011;8(4):221-225.
  23. Rallan M, Rallan NS, Navit P, Malhotra G. Modified intracanal post for severely mutilated primary anterior teeth. BMJ Case Reports 2013 Apr 18.
  24. Ramires-Romito ACD, Wanderley MT, Oliveira MD, Imparato JC, Correa MS. Biologic restoration of primary anterior teeth. Quintessence Int 2000;31(6):405-411.
  25. M Kindly change the reference number 25 to: Mittal NP. Restoring the smile: Inexpensive biologic restorations. Dental Res J (Ishan) 2014;11(3):415-421.
  26. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: www.
  27. Kunz R, Vist G, Oxman AD. Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials (Cochrane Methodology Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1; 2003.
  28. Chalmers 1983. Chalmers TC, Celano P, Sacks HS, Smith H. Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. N Engl J Med 1983;309(22):1358-1361.
  29. Schulz 1995. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman D. Empirical evidence of bias. J Am Med Assoc 1985;273(5): 408-412.
  30. Colditz 1989. Colditz GA, Miller JN, Mosteller F. How study design affects outcomes in comparison of therapy. Stat Med 1989;8(4):441-454.
  31. Schulz FK, Altman GD, Mother D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials. Ann Intern Med 2010;152(11):1-8.
  32. Qualtrough AJ, Mannocci F. Tooth-colored post systems: a review. Oper Dent 2003;28(1):86-91.
  33. Gurbuz T, Sengul F, Altun C. Finite element stress analysis of short-post core and over restorations prepared with different restorative materials Dent Material J 2008;27(4): 499-507.
  34. Vitale MC, Caprioglio C, Martignone A, Marchesi U, Botticelli AR. Combined technique with polyethylene fibres and composite resins in restoration of traumatized anterior teeth. Dent Traumatol 2004;20(3):172-177.
  35. Issao M, Guedes-Pints AC. Pediatric Dentistry Manual. 1st ed. Sao Paulo: Pancast; 1978. p. 132-134.
  36. Pithan S, Vieira RS, Chain MC. Tensile bond strength of intracanal posts in primary anterior teeth: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002;27(1):35-40.
  37. Rifkin AJ. Composite post-crowns in anterior primary teeth. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1983;38(4):225-227.
  38. Shortall AC, Baylis RL, Baylis MA, Grundy JR. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays. Int J Prosth 1989;2(3):217-221.
  39. Burke FJ, Watts DC, Wilson NHF, Wilson MA. Current status and rationale for composite inlays and onlays. Br Dent J 1991; 170(7):269-273.
  40. Yap AU, Ong LF, Teoh SH, Hastings GW. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26(3):228-235.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.