International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2014 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Mercury Exposure Levels in Children with Dental Amalgam Fillings

Indu Miriam Varkey, Rajmohan Shetty

Keywords : Hair sample, Mercury levels, Toxicity, Urine sample,Amalgam

Citation Information : Miriam Varkey I, Shetty R. Mercury Exposure Levels in Children with Dental Amalgam Fillings. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014; 7 (3):180-185.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1261

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-12-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Objectives: Mercury combined with other metals to form solid amalgams has long been used in reconstructive dentistry but its use has been controversial since at least the middle of the 19th century. The exposure and body burden of mercury reviews have consistently stated that there is a deficiency of adequate epidemiological studies addressing this issue. Fish and dental amalgam are two major sources of human exposure to organic (MeHg) and inorganic Hg respectively. Materials and methods: A total of 150 subjects aged between 9 and 14 years were divided into two groups of 75 subjects each depending on their diet, i.e. seafood or nonseafood consuming. Each category was subdivided into three groups based on number of restorations. Scalp hair and urine samples were collected at baseline and 3 months later to assess the organic and inorganic levels of mercury respectively by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS). Results: The mean values of urinary mercury (inorganic mercury) in the group of children with restorations were 1.5915 μg/l as compared to 0.0130 μg/l in the groups with no amalgam restorations (p < 0.001) (Wilcoxon sign rank test and paired t-test). The hair mercury levels (organic mercury) varied significantly between the fish-eating group and nonfish-eating group, the average values being 1.03 μg/l and 0.84 μg/l respectively (p < 0.001) (Mann-Whitney U-test and paired t-test). Conclusion and significance: The notion about the mercury being released from the amalgam restorations as a sole exposure source needs to be put to a rest, as environmental factors collectively overpower the exposure levels from restorations alone. How to cite this article: Varkey IM, Shetty R, Hegde A. Mercury Exposure Levels in Children with Dental Amalgam Fillings. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(3):180-185.


PDF Share
  1. Bates MN, Fawcett J, Garett N, Cutress T, Kjellstrom T. Health effects of dental amalgam exposure: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33(4):894-902.
  2. Mutter J, Naumann J, Sadaghiani C, Walach H, Drasch G. Amalgam studies: disregarding basic principles of mercury toxicity. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2005;208(5):435-436.
  3. Ping Li, Feng X, Qiu G. Methylmercury exposure and health effects from rice and fish consumption: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010;7:2666-2691.
  4. Barregard L, Trachtenberg F, McKinlay S. Renal effects of dental amalgam in children: the New England children's amalgam trial. Environ Health Perspect 2008 March;116(3): 394-399.
  5. Doddes JE. The amalgam controversy. JADA 2001;132(3): 348-356.
  6. Nuttall KL. Interpreting hair mercury levels in individual patients. Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science 2006; 36(3):248-261.
  7. Weiner JA, Nylander M, Berglund F. Does mercury from amalgam restorations constitute a health hazard? Sci Total Environ 1990;99:1-22.
  8. Cutress TW, Major IA, Pakomov GN, editors. Dental amalgam and human health, current situation: a New Zealand review. Dental Amalgam and Alternative Direct Restorative: Materials. Geneva: World Health Organization 1997. p. 63-71.
  9. Salehi Z, Esmaili-Sari A. Hair mercury levels in pregnant women in Mahshahr, Iran: fish consumption as a determinant of exposure. Sci Total Environ 2010 Sep 15;408(20):4848-4854.
  10. Woods JS, Martin MD, Leroux BG, DeRouen TA, Leitão JG, Bernardo MF, Luis HS, Simmonds PL, Kushleika JV, Huang Y. The contribution of dental amalgam to urinary mercury excretion in children. Environ Health Perspect 2007 Oct;115(10):1527-1531.
  11. Bellinger DC, Trachtenberg F, Zhang A, Tavares M, Daniel D, McKinlay S. Dental amalgam and psychosocial status: The New England Children's Amalgam Trial. JDR 2008 May; 87(5):470-474.
  12. Fakour H, Sari EA, Zayeri F. Mercury exposure assessment in Iranian women's hair of a port town with respect to fish consumption and amalgam fillings. Sci Total Environ 2010 March;408(7):1538-1543.
  13. Gelband H. The science and politics of dental amalgam. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1998;14(1):123-134.
  14. Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. 11th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders and CO; 2011. p. 495-496.
  15. Wolff M, Osborne IW, Hanson AL. Mercury toxicity and dental amalgam. Neuro Toxicology 1983;4(3):201-204.
  16. Abraham JE, Svare CW, Frank CWo. The effects of dental amalgam’ restorations on blood mercury levels. J Dent Res 1984 Jan;63(1):71-73.
  17. Friberg L, Kullman L, Lind B. Central nervous system in relation to amalgam filling. Kvicksilver Lakartidningen 1986; 83(7):519-522.
  18. Patterson JE, Weissberg BG, Dennison PJ. Mercury in human breath from dental amalgams. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1985 Apr;34(4):459-468.
  19. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry), US. Department of health and human services guidelines. Section of environmental epidemiology and toxicology 2008.
  20. Kruzikova K, Modra H, Kensova R, Skocovska B, Wlasow T, Svoboda T, Svobodova Z. Mercury in human hair as an indicator of the fish consumption. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2008 Oct;29(5):675-679.
  21. Levy M, Schwartz S, Dijak M, Weber JP, Tardif R, Rouah F. Childhood urine mercury excretion: dental amalgam and fish consumption as exposure factors. Environmental Research 2004;94(3):283-290.
  22. Suzuki T, Hongo T, Abe T, Matsuo N, Inoue N. Urinary mercury level in Japanese schoolchildren: influence of dental amalgam fillings and fish eating habits. Science of the Total Environment 1993;136(31):213-227.
  23. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). 1999. Toxicological profile for Mercury. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.
  24. Skare I, Engqvist A. Human exposure to mercury and silver released from dental amalgam restorations. Archives of Environmental Health 1994;49(5):384-394.
  25. Information for health care professionals mercury exposure and toxicity. OSHA-Section of Environmental Epidemiology and Toxicology. Office of Public Health, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals. Available at: www.seet.dh.la. Accessed on: December 2008.
  26. Guidelines for identifying populations at risk from mercury exposure. United Nations Environmental program. Accessed on: August 2008. Available at: http://www.chem.unep.ch.
  27. Clarkson TW. Mercury. J Am College Toxicol 1989;8(7): 1291-1296.
  28. Nicolae A, Ames H, Quinonez C. Dental amalgam and urinary mercury concentrations: a descriptive study. BMC Oral Health 2013 Sep 9;13:44.
  29. Olsson S, Bergman M. Daily dose calculations from measurements of intraoral mercury vapor. J Dent Res 1992;71(2): 414-423.
  30. Guzzi G, Pigatto PD. Urinary mercury levels in children with amalgam fillings. Environ Health Perspect 2008 Jul; 116(7):A286-A287.
  31. Xibiao Ye, Qian H, Xu P, Zhu L, Longnecker MP, Fu H. Nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and mercury exposure among children with and without dental amalgam fillings. Int J Hygiene Environmental Health 2009;212(4):378-386.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.