International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2014 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Estimation of Tooth Size Discrepancies among Different Malocclusion Groups

Narender Hasija, Madhu Bala, Virender Goyal

Keywords : Anterior ratio, Overall ratio, Tooth size,Bolton

Citation Information : Hasija N, Bala M, Goyal V. Estimation of Tooth Size Discrepancies among Different Malocclusion Groups. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014; 7 (2):82-85.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1242

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-08-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Bolton\'s ratios help in estimating overbite, overjet relationships, the effects of contemplated extractions on posterior occlusion, incisor relationships and identification of occlusal misfit produced by tooth size discrepancies. Aim: To determine any difference in tooth size discrepancy in anterior as well as overall ratio in different malocclusions and comparison with Bolton\'s study. Materials and methods: After measuring the teeth on all 100 patients, Bolton\'s analysis was performed. Results were compared with Bolton\'s means and standard deviations. The results were also subjected to statistical analysis. Results show that the mean and standard deviations of ideal occlusion cases are comparable with those Bolton but, when the mean and standard deviation of malocclusion groups are compared with those of Bolton, the values of standard deviation are higher, though the mean is comparable.


PDF Share
  1. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver D. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co; 2007. p. 199.
  2. Black GV. Descriptive anatomy of human teeth. 4th ed. Philadelphia: SS White; 1902. p. 169.
  3. Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958; 28(3):113-130.
  4. Ballard ML. Asymmetry in tooth size: a factor in etiology, diagnosis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1944;14(3):67-70.
  5. Neff CW. Tailored occlusion with the anterior coefficient. Am J Orthod 1949 Apr;35(4):309-313.
  6. Lundstrom A. Intermaxillary tooth width ratio and tooth alignment and occlusion. Acta Odontol Scand 1955 Feb;12(3-4): 265-292.
  7. Carey CW. Linear arch dimension tooth size: an evaluation of the bone and dental structures in cases involving the possible reduction of dental units in treatment. Am J Orthod 1949 Oct;35(10):762-775.
  8. Crosby DR, Alexander CG. The occurrence of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989 Jun;95(6):457-461.
  9. Fattahi HR, Pakshir HR, Hedayati Z. Comparison of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Eur J Orthod 2006 Oct;28(5):491-495.
  10. Endo T, Abe R, Kuroki H, Oka K, Shimooka S. Tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusions in a Japanese orthodontic population. Angle Orthod 2008 Nov;78(6): 994-999.
  11. Batool I, Abbas A, Rizvi SA, Abbas I. Evaluation of tooth size discrepancy in different malocclusion groups. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008 Oct-Dec;20(4):51-54.
  12. Lopatiene K, Dumbravaite A. Relationship between tooth size discrepancies and malocclusion. Stomatologia 2009;11(4): 119-124.
  13. Al-Khateeb SN, Abu-Alhaija ES. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample. Angle Orthod 2006 May;76(3):459-465.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.