Citation Information :
Bembi S, Bembi NN, Sood A, Gambhir A. To Evaluate the Effect of Different Adhesive Materials on the Microleakage of Bonded Amalgam Restorations: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012; 5 (3):185-189.
This study evaluated the ability of different adhesive materials in reducing the microleakage in class V amalgam restorations. Standardized class V cavities were prepared on the facial surface of 56 noncarious human premolars, they were then randomly divided into control and experimental groups based on adhesives used. Group I was the control group with Copal Varnish, group II had Panavia F 2.0, Group III contained Vitrebond Plus and group IV had RelyX ARC as adhesives. Amalgam was hand condensed into each preparation after application of adhesive material. Specimens were thermocycled, stained and sectioned. Microleakage was graded using a stereomicroscope. Less leakage was observed in all experimental groups compared to control group (p < 0.01) on nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Mann-Whitney test observed leakage was more extensive at the gingival margins (p < 0.01) in all restorations than at occlusal margins. Group III showed no leakage which was significantly different from other groups (p < 0.05). Hence, this study concluded that application of intermediate adhesive material before condensation of amalgam can act as an effective barrier for microleakage.
How to cite this article: Bembi S, Bembi NN, Sood A, Gambhir A. To Evaluate the Effect of Different Adhesive Materials on the Microleakage of Bonded Amalgam Restorations: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012; 5(3):185-189.
de Morais PM (Dentistry School of Piracicaba-UNICAMP, São Paulo, Brazil), Rodrigues Júnior AL, Pimenta LA. Quantitative microleakage evaluation around amalgam restorations with different treatments on cavity walls. Oper Dent 1999 Jul- Aug;24(4):217-222.
Setcos JC (Turner Dental School, University of Manchester), Staninec M, Wilson NH. The development of resin-bonding for amalgam restorations. Br Dent J 1999 Apr 10;186(7):328-332.
Chen RS (Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National Taiwan University, No 1, Chang-Te Street, Taipei, Taiwan), Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Oper Dent 2000 Sep-Oct;25(5):411-417.
Toledano M (Department of Dental Materials, University of Granada, Spain. email@example.com), Osorio E, Osorio R, García-Godoy F. Microleakage and SEM interfacial micromorphology of amalgam restorations using three adhesive systems. J Dent 2000 Aug;28(6):423-428.
Alani AH (University of Malaya, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent 1997 Jul-Aug;22(4):173-185.
Murray PE (Department of Oral Biology, The University of Birmingham, School of Dentistry, St Chad's Queensway, UK. firstname.lastname@example.org), Hafez AA, Smith AJ, Cox CF. Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials. Dent Mater 2002 Sep;18(6):470- 478.
Yap AU (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Eastman Institute of Oral Health Sciences, London, U.K), Mok BY, Pearson G. An in vitro microleakage study of the ‘bonded base’ restorative technique. J Oral Rehabil 1997 Mar;24(3):230-236.
Edgren BN (Department of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242-1068), Denehy GE. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using Amalgambond and copalite. Am J Dent 1992 Dec;5(6):296-298.
Ben-Amer A (Section of Operative Dentistry, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel), Cardash HS, Judes H. The sealing of the tooth/amalgam interface by corrosion products. J Oral Rehabil 1995 Feb;22(2):101-104.
Sepetcioglu F (Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey), Ataman BA. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of cavity varnish and adhesive resin with amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 1998 Feb;79(2):136-139.
Newman JE Jr (Cowan Dental Clinic, Fort Sill, Oklahoma, USA), Hondrum SO, Clem DB. Microleakage under amalgam restorations lined with Copalite, Amalgambond Plus, and Vitrebond. Gen Dent 1996 Jul-Aug;44(4):340-344.
Castelnuovo J (Advanced Education Program in Prosthodontics, Loma Linda University, School of Dentistry, California, USA), Tjan AH, Liu P. Microleakage of multistep and simplified-step bonding systems. Am J Dent 1996 Dec;9(6):245-248.
Swift EJ Jr (Department of Operative Dentistry, University of North Carolina, School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, USA), Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: A brief history and state of the art,1995. Quintessence Int 1995 Feb;26(2):95-110.
Cenci MS (School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil), Piva E, Potrich F, Formolo E, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials. Braz Dent J 2004 Aug 16;15(1):13-18.
Nakanuma K (Department of Endodontics, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Chiba, Japan. nakanuma@ mascat.nihon-u.ac.jp), Hayakawa T, Tomita T, Yamazaki M. Effect of the application of dentin primers and a dentin bonding agent on the adhesion between the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and dentin. Dent Mater 1998 Jul;14(4):281-286.
Carvalho RM (Department of Operative Dentistry, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Silva NR, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise selfetching primers to dentine. J Dent 2004 Jan;32(1):55-65.