International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2010 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Antibacterial Properties of Fluoride Releasing Glass Ionomer Cements (GICs) and Pit and Fissure Sealants on Streptococcus Mutans

Usha Mohan Das, Mahesh Kumar M, Mithun Pai BH, Prashant GM, VV Subba Reddy, Chandu GN

Citation Information : Mohan Das U, Kumar M M, Pai BH M, GM P, Subba Reddy V, GN C. Antibacterial Properties of Fluoride Releasing Glass Ionomer Cements (GICs) and Pit and Fissure Sealants on Streptococcus Mutans. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2010; 3 (2):93-96.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1060

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-03-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2010; The Author(s).


Abstract

Title: Antibacterial properties of fluoride releasing glass Ionomer cements (GICs) and pit and fissure sealants on Streptococcus mutans. Background: Occlusal pit and fissures are the most susceptible sites for dental caries. The clinical effectiveness of GICs and fissure sealants in preventing caries is well-documented, but there is some concern about bacteria left beneath sealants. Objective: (1) Study the antibacterial activity of GICs and pit and fissure sealants. (2) Compare between these materials. Methodology: GICs (Fuji IX GP and Ketac molar) and pit and fissure sealants (Teethmate-F1 and Helioseal-F ). The strains was grown in the Brain Heart Infusion broth and was incubated anaerobically for 18 hours at 37°C and subcultured in MSB agar. Four wells measuring 5 mm diameter was prepared on each agar plate and the prepared materials was placed and further incubated anaerobically for 48 hours at 37°C. The zone of inhibition was measured. Results: All the materials tested showed antibacterial properties to varying levels except; among pit and fissure sealants it is Teethmate-F which showed more antibacterial property. Conclusion: Teethmate-F1 sealant showed more antibacterial property compared to Fuji IX and Ketac molar. Helioseal-F did not show any antibacterial property.


PDF Share
  1. Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Garcia-Godoy F. Antibacterial activity of fluoride release sealants on mutants streptococci. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1996;20(2):109-111
  2. Two-year report of sealant effect on bacteria in dental caries. J Am Dent Assoc 1976 Nov;93(5):967-970
  3. Comparison of antibacterial properties of two fluoride-releasing and a nonfluoride releasing pit and fissure sealants. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2007 Jul-Sep;25(3):133-136
  4. The viability of microorganisms in carious lesions five years after covering with a fissure sealants. J Am Dent Assoc 1978 Sep;97(3):455-462
  5. Antibacterial activity of glass ionomer restorative cements exposed to cavity-producing microorganisms. Oper Dent 1999 Sep-Oct;24(5):286-291
  6. Inhibition of microbial adherence and growth by various glass ionomers in vitro. Dent Mater 1992 Jan;8(1):16-20
  7. Sealant revisited: An update of the effectiveness of pit-and-fissure sealants. Caries Res 1993;27(Suppl 1):77-82
  8. The effect of acid and fluoride release on the antimicrobial properties of four glass ionomer cements. Pediatr Dent 1994 Sep-Oct;16(5):368-370
  9. Addition of fluoride to pit and fissure sealants-A feasibility study. J Dent Res 1976 Sep-Oct;55(5):757-771
  10. Cariology. 3rd ed. USA: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc; 1989. p. 64-68.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.