International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2010 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Biomechanical Stress Analysis of Mandibular First Permanent Molar; Restored with Amalgam and Composite Resin: A Computerized Finite Element Study

AR Prabhakar, Iqbal Musani

Citation Information : Prabhakar A, Musani I. Biomechanical Stress Analysis of Mandibular First Permanent Molar; Restored with Amalgam and Composite Resin: A Computerized Finite Element Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2010; 3 (1):5-14.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1047

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-00-0000


Abstract

Normal mastication with its varying magnitude and direction generates considerable reactionary stresses in teeth and their supporting tissues. The structure of the human tooth and its supporting tissues is a complex assemblage of materials of varied mechanical properties. The finite element method (FEM), a modern technique of numerical stress analysis, has the great advantage of being applicable to solids of irregular geometry and heterogeneous material properties and therefore ideally suited to the examination of structural behavior of teeth. The mandibular first permanent molar is one of the earliest permanent teeth to erupt in the oral cavity and hence most prone to caries. The purpose of the present study was to construct a two-dimensional FE model of the mandibular first permanent molar and its supporting structures, using a FE software called NISA II–Display III, EMRC, USA to study the following: • To compare stress distributions patterns when a modeled Class I Cavity was restored with dental amalgam and composite resin. • To compare the stress distributions pattern when the load was applied to different to locations, i.e.: At the mesial cusp tip, and at the center of the occlusal surface. Both amalgam and composite resin showed similar stress distribution pattern, however, the magnitudes of stresses generated in the tooth restored with composite resin were higher. Thus, amalgam is a better restorative material in distributing stresses.


PDF Share
  1. Bayne, SC.; Taylor, DF. The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. In: Sturdevant, CM, Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, co-editors. Missouri: Mosby-Year Book, Inc; 1997. Chapter 6, Dental Materials; p. 216-219
  2. Effects of cement bases on the stresses and deflections in composite restorations. J Dent Res 1976 Jan-Feb;55(1):115-120
  3. Modeling the mechanical behavior of the jaws and their related structures by finite element (FE) analysis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8(1):90-104
  4. Display III: Training Manual [Internet]. EMRC, USA. Available from: www.hkecc.co.kr/pds/down. php?code=edum&num=22&tn=cs
  5. Skinners Science of Dental Materials. 9th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1991. p. 57
  6. Tooth stiffness with composite veneers: a stain gauge and finite element evaluation. Dent Mater 1994 Jul;10(4):247-252
  7. Analysis of stresses and breaking loads for Class I cavity preparations in mandibular first molars. Quintessence Int 1989 Mar;20(3):205-210
  8. Finite element Stress analysis of restored teeth. Dent Mater 1987 Aug;3(4):200-206
  9. Finite element stress analysis of the crown of normal and restored teeth. J Dent Res 1976 Nov-Dec;55(6)1004-1011.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.