Acceptance of Staff and Students of a Private Dental College for a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Replace the Dental Probe: A Cross-sectional Study
Ashwin M Jawdekar, Abhishek D Walhekar, Laresh N Mistry, Amar N Katre
Keywords :
Dental examination, Dental explorer, Dental probe, Detection of caries, Diagnosis of dental conditions, Visuotactile method
Citation Information :
Jawdekar AM, Walhekar AD, Mistry LN, Katre AN. Acceptance of Staff and Students of a Private Dental College for a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Replace the Dental Probe: A Cross-sectional Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025; 18 (1):86-90.
Aim and background: The dental probe is a commonly used instrument for the visuotactile examination of teeth in the diagnosis of caries, periodontal conditions, etc., and also for the removal of debris. Due to its sharp end and invasive nature, its use is controversial in children. A study was conducted to assess the acceptance of dental college staff and students for a novel diagnostic tool to replace the dental probe.
Materials and methods: A questionnaire was developed and validated to record the responses pertaining to several considerations for the replacement of the dental probe and acceptance of the novel tool from the staff and clinical students of two departments (Oral Medicine and Pediatric Dentistry) of a private dental college and hospital.
Results: Both staff and clinical students of two departments indicated acceptance for the use of the novel diagnostic tool to replace the dental probe with reference to several parameters. In the interdepartmental comparison, the staff and students of pediatric dentistry preferred the novel tool compared to those of Oral Medicine, and in the interdesignational comparison, students preferred the novel tool to replace the dental probe more than the staff [assessed using the mean and standard deviation (SD) acceptance using t-test with significance <0.05].
Conclusion: In conclusion, the novel diagnostic tool to replace the dental probe has potential for acceptance and can be recommended for further use and more research.
Clinical significance: The novel diagnostic tool to replace the dental probe can help dentistry present in a less invasive and more attractive manner.
Pitts NB. Diagnostic tools and measurements–impact on appropriate care. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25(1):24–35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00896.x
Listgarten MA. Periodontal probing: what does it mean? J Clin Periodontol 1980;7(3):165–176. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1980.tb01960.x
Hussain JSA, Ram SM, Galinde J, et al. Occupational exposure to sharp instrument injuries among dental, medical and nursing students in Mahatma Gandhi Mission's Campus, Navi Mumbai, India. J Contemp Dent 2012;2(2):1–10.
Neuhaus KW, Ellwood R, Lussi A, et al. Traditional lesion detection aids. Monogr Oral Sci 2009;21:42–51. DOI: 10.1159/000224211
Hamilton JC. Should a dental explorer be used to probe suspected carious lesions? Yes–an explorer is a time-tested tool for caries detection. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136(11):1526. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0082
Jawdekar AM. Child management in clinical dentistry. 1st ed. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2010. p. 9, 18–19. ISBN: 9788184488739.
Braga MM, Mendes FM, Ekstrand KR. Detection activity assessment and diagnosis of dental caries lesions. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54(3):479–493. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2010.03.006
Rashid MF, Karobari MI, Halim MS, et al. Effectiveness of visual-tactile examination and DIAGNOdent Pen in detecting early enamel caries and its remineralisation: an in vitro study. Biomed Res Int 2022;2022:1263750. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1263750
Ekstrand KR, Martignon S, Ricketts DJ, et al. Detection and activity assessment of primary coronal caries lesions: a methodologic study. Oper Dent 2007;32(3):225–235. DOI: 10.2341/06-63
Featherstone JDB, Doméjean S. Minimal intervention dentistry: part 1. From ‘compulsive’ restorative dentistry to rational therapeutic strategies. Br Dent J 2012;213:441–445.
Banerjee A. ‘Minimum intervention’ - MI inspiring future oral healthcare? Br Dent J 2017;223:133–135.
Stookey G. Should a dental explorer be used to probe suspected carious lesions? No–use of an explorer can lead to misdiagnosis and disrupt remineralization. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136(11):1527.
Ismail AI. Clinical diagnosis of precavitated carious lesions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25(1):13–23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00895.x
Slimani A, Terrer E, Manton DJ, et al. Carious lesion detection technologies: factual clinical approaches. Br Dent J 2020;229(7):432–442. DOI: 10.1038/s41415-020-2116-3
Warreth A. Dental caries and its management. Int J Dent 2023;2023:9365845. DOI: 10.1155/2023/9365845