Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding and Columella Lengthening for Early Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Rehabilitation: A Comprehensive Clinical Case Report
Kushal P Taori, Priyanka Niranjane, Ranjit Kamble
Keywords :
Case report, Cleft lip and palate, Nasoalveolar molding, Nasoalveolar molding therapy
Citation Information :
Taori KP, Niranjane P, Kamble R. Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding and Columella Lengthening for Early Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Rehabilitation: A Comprehensive Clinical Case Report. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024; 17 (8):955-961.
Aim and background: In presurgical infant orthopedics, nasoalveolar molding (NAM) therapy has gained more popularity worldwide in treating patients with cleft lip and palate because of its soft tissue nasal corrections in addition to the alignment and close approximation of the cleft alveolar segments, which gives better postsurgical stability and esthetics with minimal tissue tension and scar formation to the patients.
The clinical case report aims to show the better post-NAM results, which had helped to gain better postsurgical results in terms of stability and aesthetics in hard and soft tissues.
Case description: This clinical report presents the case of a 9-day-old female patient reported in the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics at Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital with nonsyndromic complete left-sided unilateral cleft lip and palate with a defect size of 13 mm, which was treated with a presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) appliance. NAM therapy takes advantage of circulating maternal estrogen, bringing pliability to the cartilage cells for presurgical cartilage molding. This has resulted in the closure of the alveolar defect from 13 mm to <2 mm in the present case, with nasal symmetry restoration due to nasal stent within 12 weeks of active treatment; hence, the postsurgical esthetics are maintained.
Conclusion: NAM therapy remained beneficial and had significant aesthetic results in reducing the cleft defect size. Because of this, it gained a big surgical advantage in reducing tissue tension, primary stability, and scar formation.
Clinical significance: By reducing the cleft defect size of the dysplastic maxillae, which brings the lip segments and alveolar segments closer to each other, it thus reduces the defect size for primary lip and palate repair. This serves as the biggest advantage for maxillofacial and plastic surgeons to maintain the posttreatment results with redefined aesthetics and symmetry.
Attiguppe PR, Karuna YM, Yavagal C, et al. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding: a boon to facilitate the surgical repair in infants with cleft lip and palate. Contemp Clin Dent 2016;7:569–573. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.194104
Dinh TTN, Van Nguyen D, Dien VHA, et al. Effectiveness of presurgical nasoalveolar molding appliance in infants with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2022;59:995–1000. DOI: 10.1177/10556656211026493
Kamble VD, Parkhedkar RD, Sarin SP, et al. Simplifying cleft surgery by presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) for an infant born with unilateral cleft lip, alveolus, and palate: a clinical report. J Prosthodont Res 2013;57:224–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2013.03.002
Grayson BH, Maull D. Nasoalveolar molding for infants born with clefts of the lip, alveolus, and palate. Clin Plast Surg 2004;2:149–158. DOI: 10.1016/S0094-1298(03)00140-8
Matsuo K, Hirose T. Nonsurgical correction of cleft lip nasal deformity in the early neonate. Ann Acad Med Singap 1988;17:358–365.
Matsuo K, Hirose T, Otagiri T, et al. Repair of cleft lip with nonsurgical correction of nasal deformity in the early neonatal period. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;83:25–31. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198901000-00006
Matsuo K, Hirose T. Preoperative non-surgical over-correction of cleft lip nasal deformity. Br J Plast Surg 1991;44:5–11. DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(91)90168-j
Riley DS, Barber MS, Kienle GS, et al. CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document. J Clin Epidemiol 2017;89:218–235.
Grayson BH, Santiago PE, Brecht LE. Cutting CB: presurgical nasoalveolar molding in infants with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:486–498. DOI: 10.1597/15451569_1999_036_0486_pnmiiw_2.3.co_2
Grayson BH, Shetye PR. Presurgical nasoalveolar moulding treatment in cleft lip and palate patients. Indian J Plast Surg 2009;42:56–61. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.57188
Niranjane PP, Kamble RH, Diagavane SP, et al. Current status of presurgical infant orthopaedic treatment for cleft lip and palate patients: a critical review. Indian J Plast Surg 2014;47:293–302. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.146573
McNeil CK. Orthodontic procedures in the treatment of congenital cleft palate. Dent Rec (London) 1950;70:126–132.
Liou EJ, Subramanian M, Chen PK, et al. The progressive changes of nasal symmetry and growth after nasoalveolar molding: a three-year follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:858–864. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000133027.04252.7a
Suri S. Design features and simple methods of incorporating nasal stents in presurgical nasoalveolar molding appliances. J Craniofac Surg 2009;2:1889–1894. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181b6c74a
Grayson BH, Cutting C, Wood R. Preoperative columella lengthening in bilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;92:1422–1423.