Olando K D'souza, Paul Chalakkal, Ida de Noronha de Ataide
Keywords :
Bi helix, Case report, Modification, Modified, Quad helix, Unilateral crossbite
Citation Information :
D'souza OK, Chalakkal P, de Ataide ID. A Modification of the Quad Helix: The “Bi Helix”. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024; 17 (7):822-825.
Aim and background: The quad helix is well known for its ability to treat posterior crossbites in children with maxillary deficiency. A few authors have also used it for the treatment of unilateral crossbite due to unilateral maxillary deficiency by incorporating modifications in the appliance. The aim was to treat a unilateral crossbite using a newly modified quad helix.
Case description: An 8-year-old female patient had presented with multiple missing teeth and a unilateral posterior crossbite due to an asymmetric maxillary arch. The amount of unilateral asymmetry was measured using a unique method over the cast. A modified quad helix was cemented to treat the unilateral posterior crossbite, and correction was obtained in 30 days. A Nance palatal arch was cemented which functioned as a space maintainer and a retention appliance.
Conclusion: The posterior unilateral crossbite was treated successfully with the modified quad helix.
Clinical significance: This article highlights a new modification of the quad helix for treating unilateral posterior crossbite and a new method of measuring maxillary asymmetry. The modification has been termed as a “bi helix” since it eliminates two helices from the classic quad helix design.
Coffin WH. A generalized treatment of irregularities. Paper read to section XII of the International Medical Congress. Trans Int Cong Med 1881;3:542–547.
Brandt S, Ricketts RM. Interview: Dr. Robert M. Ricketts on growth prediction. 2. J Clin Orthod 1975;9(6):340–349, 352–362.
Chebolu SVR, Maheshwari U, Devaki VR. A customized quad helix: an appliance for management of unilateral posterior cross-bite. Indian J Orthod Dentofacial Res 2019;5(3):108–112. DOI: 10.18231/j.ijodr.2019.023
O'Malley P, Willis P, Sandler PJ. Treatment of a unilateral crossbite with no mandibular displacement using a modified quad helix. Orthod Update 2009;2(4):109–110. DOI: 10.12968/ortu.2009.2.4.109
Toroglu MS, Uzel E, Kayalioglu M, et al. Asymmetric maxillary expansion (AMEX) appliance for treatment of true unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122(2):164–173. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.125563
Fontana M, Cozzani M, Caprioglio A. Non-compliance maxillary molar distalizing appliances: an overview of the last decade. Prog Orthod 2012;13(2):173–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.pio.2011.10.002
Sollenius O, Golež A, Primožič J, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of forced unilateral posterior crossbite correction in the mixed dentition: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2020;42(4):415–425. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjz054
Alsawaf DH, Almaasarani SG, Hajeer MY, et al. The effectiveness of the early orthodontic correction of functional unilateral posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod 2022;23(1):5. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-022-00398-4
Abu Rub N, Samsudin AR, Burhanudddin A, et al. Arch expansion in cleft lip and palate children: a comparison between rapid palatal expansion and Quad Helix expansion appliances. Chin J Dent Res 2008;11(2):108–114.
Boysen B, La Cour K, Athanasiou AE, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of dentoskeletal changes after posterior cross-bite correction by quad-helix or removable appliances. Br J Orthod 1992;19(2):97–107. DOI: 10.1179/bjo.19.2.97