International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Mandibular Intercanine Width at Three Stages of Mixed Dentition in Children at Namakkal District: A Cross-sectional Study

Chandrakantha Balaraman, Sharath Asokan, PR GeethaPriya, TD YogeshKumar, Sudhandra Viswanath

Keywords : Canine teeth, Cross-sectional study, Incisors, Mandible, Mixed dentition, Tooth eruption

Citation Information : Balaraman C, Asokan S, GeethaPriya P, YogeshKumar T, Viswanath S. Mandibular Intercanine Width at Three Stages of Mixed Dentition in Children at Namakkal District: A Cross-sectional Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024; 17 (7):737-741.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2842

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 12-09-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To assess and compare the mandibular intercanine width (ICW) of children at three stages of mixed dentition in children at Namakkal district. Materials and methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 135 schoolchildren aged 7–11 years, with 45 children in each group. Group I included children with completely erupted permanent mandibular central incisors, group II included children with completely erupted permanent mandibular central and lateral incisors, and group III included children with completely erupted permanent mandibular central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines. Impressions were made in the mandibular anterior region, and study casts were prepared. Measurements of the mandibular ICW were taken using a digital vernier caliper. Results: The mean mandibular ICW after the complete eruption of permanent mandibular central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines was 23.7, 25.5, and 25.7 mm, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the ICW between the three groups (p < 0.001). Post hoc tests showed that mandibular ICW was statistically significant between groups I and II and group III (p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis showed that age does not contribute to the changes in mandibular ICW. Conclusion: The average mandibular ICW found can be a standard comparison for treatment planning in the western Tamil Nadu population. Mandibular ICW reaches its maximum after the eruption of permanent mandibular lateral incisors. Changes in mandibular ICW should be attributed to the eruption of permanent mandibular anterior teeth and not to the age of the child.


PDF Share
  1. Paulino V, Paredes V, Cibrian R, et al. Dental arch changes from adolescence to adulthood in a Spanish population: a cross-sectional study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16(4):e607–e613. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.16.e607
  2. Carter GA, McNamara JA Jr. Longitudinal dental arch changes in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114(1):88–99. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70243-4
  3. Cassidy KM, Harris EF, Tolley EA, et al. Genetic influence on dental arch form in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 1998;68(5):445–454. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0445:GIODAF>2.3.CO;2
  4. Yuvashree CS, Jain RK, Prasad AS. Severity of mandibular arch crowding in different sagittal malocclusions. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2022;13(Suppl 1):S45–S49. DOI: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_121_22
  5. Huck L, Kahl-Nieke B, Schwarze CW, et al. Postretention changes in canine position. Results of a long-term follow-up. J Orofac Orthop 2000;61(3):199–206. DOI: 10.1007/s000560050005
  6. O'Shaughnessy KW, Koroluk LD, Phillips C, et al. Efficiency of serial extraction and late premolar extraction cases treated with fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139(4):510–516. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.039
  7. Navaneethan R, Jain RK, Maliael MT. Mandibular arch changes following expansion with schwarz appliance in growing patients–a systematic review. Int J Orthod Rehabil 2022;13(1):1–9. DOI: 10.56501/intjorthodrehabil.v13i1.15
  8. Aljabab MA, Algharbi M, Huggare J, et al. Impact of early extraction of the deciduous canine on relief of severe crowding: Does it influence later orthodontic interventions? Angle Orthodontist 2021;91(6):743–748. DOI: 10.2319/020621-109.1
  9. Espinosa DG, Cruz CM, Normando D. The effect of extraction of lower primary canines on the morphology of dental arch: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent 2021;31(5):583–597. DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12726
  10. Sinobad T, Obradović-Djuricić K, Nikolić Z, et al. The effect of disinfectants on dimensional stability of addition and condensation silicone impressions. Vojnosanit Pregl 2014;71(3):251–258. DOI: 10.2298/vsp120709037s
  11. Thakur A, Thakur S, Singhal P, et al. Maxillary intercanine width at three stages of dentition—a cross-sectional study. Int J Forensic Odontol 2021;6:123–126.
  12. De la Cruz A, Sampson P, Little RM, et al. Long-term changes in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107(5):518–530. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70119-2
  13. Barrow GV, White JR. Developmental changes of the maxillary and mandibular dental arches. Angle Orthod 1952;22:41–46.
  14. Knott VB. Longitudinal study of dental arch width at four stages of dentition. Angle Orthod 1972;42(4):387–395. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1972)042<0387:LSODAW>2.0.CO;2
  15. Sinclair PM, Little RM. Maturation of untreated normal occlusions. Am J Orthod 1983;83(2):114–123. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9416(83)90296-8
  16. Moorrees CFA, Reed RB. Changes in dental arch dimensions expressed on the basis of tooth eruption as a measure of biologic age. J Dent Res 1965;44:129–139. DOI: 10.1177/00220345650440010601
  17. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Treder J, et al. Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111(4):401–409. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)80022-4
  18. Ross-Powell RE, Harris EF. Growth of the anteriordental arch in black American children: a longitudinal study from 3 to 18 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118(6):649–657. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.110811
  19. Arslan SG, Kama JD, Sahin S, et al. Longitudinal changes in dental arches from mixed to permanent dentition in a Turkish population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:576.e15–576.e21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.06.009
  20. Thilander B. Dentoalveolar development in subjects with normal occlusion. A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years. Eur J Orthod 2009;31(2):109–120. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjn124
  21. Adamek A, Minch L, Kawala B. Intercanine width–review of the literature. Dent Med Prob 2015;52(3):336–340.
  22. Garg H, Khatria H, Kaldhari K, et al. Intermolar and intercanine width changes among class I and class II malocclusions following orthodontic treatment. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(Suppl 1):S4–S9. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2049
  23. Sillman JH. Dimensional changes of the dental arches: longitudinal study from birth to 25 years. Am J Orthod 1964;50:600–616. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(64)90040-5
  24. Moyers RE, Van der Linden PGM, Riolo ML, et al. Standards of human occlusal development. Monograph 5, Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan; 1976.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.