International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 5 ( May, 2024 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Treatment Option for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: A Speech Aid

Raja Singh, Roma Goswami, Deepesh Saxena, Himanshu Kapoor, Ishita Gupta

Keywords : Case report, Hypernasality retention, Soft palate, Speech aid pharyngeal obturator, Velopharyngeal insufficiency

Citation Information : Singh R, Goswami R, Saxena D, Kapoor H, Gupta I. Treatment Option for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: A Speech Aid. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024; 17 (5):601-604.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2869

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 22-08-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Defects such as cleft palate often co-occur with velopharyngeal (VP) incompetence, leading to dysfunction and a characteristic nasal snort in patients. With the evolution of treatment concepts, treatment of cleft palate patients has been introduced where obturators have helped improve the speech of individuals with partial or total velar defects, that is, cleft of the soft palate. The soft palate separates the oral and nasal cavities. Treatment of VP function, especially VP incompetence, by palatal lift appliances, has become a part of the current trend for the rehabilitation of VP dysfunction. This case report describes the rehabilitation of a dentulous patient with a congenital soft palate defect using a functional impression technique in which a palatal plate with a solid one-piece pharyngeal obturator prosthesis has been used.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Thomas CA, Beumer J III. Maxillofacial Rehabilitation Prosthodontic and Surgical Considerations. St. Louis: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica; 1979. pp. 244–291.
  2. Yenisey M, Cengiz S, Sarıkaya I. Prosthetic treatment of congenital hard and soft palate defects. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2012;49(5):618–621. DOI: 10.1597/10-016
  3. Moore D, McCord JF. Prosthetic dentistry and the unilateral cleft lip and palate patient. The last 30 years. A review of the prosthodontic literature in respect of treatment options. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2004;12(2):70–74.
  4. Thomas D, Taylor TD. Clinical application of palatal lift patient in Clinical Maxillofacial Prosthetics. 133–144.
  5. Beumer J 3rd, Brady FA. Dental management of the irradiated patient. Int J Oral Surg 1978;7(3):208–220. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9785(78)80026-x
  6. Zarb GA, Blonder CL. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patient: complete dentures and implant-supported prostheses. In: Jacob RF (Ed). Maxillofacial Prosthodontics for the Edentulous Patient. St. Louis: Mosby Inc.; 2004. pp. 449–470.
  7. Saunders TR, Oliver NA. A speech-aid prosthesis for anterior maxillary implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthetic Dent 1993;70(6):546–547. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90271-o
  8. Beumer J, Curtis TA, Firtell DN. Maxillofacial rehabilitation: prosthodontic and surgical consideration. St. Louis: The CV Mosby Co.; 1979.
  9. Wolfaardt JF, Wilson FB, Rochet A, et al. An appliance based approach to the management of palatopharyngeal incompetency: a clinical pilot project. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69(2):186–195. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90139-f
  10. Management of the Soft Palate Defect. np. www.sid.cu/galerias/pdf/sitosis/prothesis/management_management_of_the_soft_palate_defect_steven_eckert.pdf (accessed 3/3/2014).
  11. Folkins JW. Velopharyngeal nomenclature: incompetence, inadequacy, insufficiency, and dysfunction. Cleft Palate J 1988;25(4):413–436.
  12. Shelton RL, Lindquist AF, Chisum L, et al. Effect of speech bulb reduction on articulation, and cleft palate. J Prosthet Dent 1968;5:195–204.
  13. Aran A, Subhtenly JD. Velopharyngeal function and cleft palate prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1959;9:149.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.