International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2024 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Rehabilitation of an Ocular Defect Using a Custom Ocular Prosthesis in a Pediatric Patient

Akansha V Bansod, Sweta Pisulkar, Arushi Beri, Seema Sathe

Keywords : Case report, Children, Maxillofacial prosthesis, Maxillofacial prosthodontist, Ocular prosthesis

Citation Information : Bansod AV, Pisulkar S, Beri A, Sathe S. Rehabilitation of an Ocular Defect Using a Custom Ocular Prosthesis in a Pediatric Patient. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024; 17 (4):479-482.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2798

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 18-07-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

It is a well-known saying that the eyes are “windows to the soul.” The absence or loss of any facial part, particularly the vision, can lead to severe physical as well as emotional trauma. Losing any part of the face causes the patient societal, physical, and psychological anguish. An ocular prosthesis aims to improve social acceptance and boost self-confidence by restoring the facial appearance. A pediatric dental specialist should be a part of the maxillofacial prosthesis team since maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation in young children can be challenging, especially with the less cooperative ones. The following case report describes these challenges in relation to a 5-year-old boy who had his eye enucleated due to trauma. The purpose of the case was to provide custom-built, acrylic ocular prostheses in as comfortable and atraumatic manner as possible by the maxillofacial prosthetic team.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Beumer J, Curtis TA, Marunick MT. Maxillofacial Rehabilitation: Prosthodontic and Surgical Considerations. St. Louis: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, Inc; 1996. pp. 417–431.
  2. Wright GZ, Starkey PE, Gardner DE. Factors influencing the use of behavioural management techniques during child management by dentists. Child Manage Dent 1987:86–97.
  3. Doshi PJ, Aruna B. Prosthetic management of patient with ocular defect. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2005;5(1):37–38. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.16340
  4. Chau A, Fung K, Yip L, et al. Orbital development in Hong Kong Chinese subjects. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004;24(5):436–439. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00217.x
  5. Ji Y, Ye F, Zhou H, et al. Bony orbital maldevelopment after enucleation. J Anat 2015;227(5):647–653. DOI: 10.1111/joa.12372
  6. Zekman TN, Ladenheim J, Scott RB. Ocular prosthetics. AMA Arch Ophthalmol 1955;54(5):733–743. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1955.00930020739017
  7. Raizada D, Raizada K, Naik M, et al. Custom ocular prosthesis in children: how often is a change required? Orbit 2011;30(5):208–213. DOI: 10.3109/01676830.2011.580035
  8. Shaikh SR, Gangurde AP, Shambharkar VI. Changing ocular prostheses in growing children: a 5-year follow-up clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111(4):346–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.021
  9. Cain JR. Custom ocular prosthetics. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48(6):690–694. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(82)80030-9
  10. Scott JH. Growth of the human face. Proc R Soc Med 1953;47(2):91–100.
  11. Yago K, Furuta M. Orbital growth after unilateral enucleation in infancy without an orbital implant. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2001;45(6):648–652. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-5155(01)00427-0
  12. Bartlett SO, Moore DJ. Ocular prosthesis: a physiologic system. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29(4):450–459. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(73)80024-1
  13. Bentley RP, Sgouros S, Natarajan K, et al. Normal changes in orbital volume during childhood. J Neurosurg 2002;96(4):742–746. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2002.96.4.0742
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.