International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Impact of Implementing Psychological Ownership in Undergraduate Dental Clinical Training: A Retrospective Study

Gnanasekaran Felsypremila, MS Muthu, Latha Nirmal, KC Vignesh, Anshula N Deshpande, Gauri S Lele, Richa K Bahal, Vijay P Mathur, Sonali Saha, Nikhil Marwah, Latha Anandakrishna

Keywords : Dental education, Measurable outcomes, Ownership, Undergraduate training

Citation Information : Felsypremila G, Muthu M, Nirmal L, Vignesh K, Deshpande AN, Lele GS, Bahal RK, Mathur VP, Saha S, Marwah N, Anandakrishna L. Impact of Implementing Psychological Ownership in Undergraduate Dental Clinical Training: A Retrospective Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024; 17 (3):279-284.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2769

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Purpose: The idea of psychological ownership (PO) has been utilized in a variety of contexts, but the significance and lessons learned from using PO in dental clinical education have not been investigated. A detailed long-term study of PO in dental clinical education will allow us to understand the effectiveness of this practice. The purpose of this paper is to compare undergraduate (UG) student's clinical performance before and after the PO system was implemented. Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted with around 70–80 students in an academic year from June 2012 to June 2019. Through ownership quality, four-handed dentistry, observation and assistance, supply of must-haves, and measurable outcomes, the clinical performance of students in pre- and post-PO systems was compared. Results: The quantum of overall clinical procedures performed by the UG students was 8,214 and 13,753 in pre-PO and post-PO, respectively. Chi-squared tests performed unveil that there exists a statistically significant difference in the quantum of clinical procedures performed by UG after the implementation of PO. Conclusion: The results of our study clearly state that there was a significant increase in the quantum of clinical procedures performed by UG students after the implementation of the PO system.


PDF Share
  1. Pierce JL, Rubenfeld SA, Morgan S. Employee ownership: a conceptual model of process and effects. Acad Manag Rev 1991;16(1):121–144. DOI: 10.2307/258609
  2. Pierce J L, Kostova T, Dirks KT. Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 2001;26(2):298–310. DOI: 10.2307/259124
  3. Baer M, Brown G. Blind in one eye: how psychological ownership of ideas affects the types of suggestions people adopt. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2012;118(1):60–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.01.003
  4. Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT. The state of psychological ownership: integrating and extending a century of research. Rev Gen Psychol 2003;7(1):84–107. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84
  5. Olckers C, du Plessis Y. The role of psychological ownership in retaining talent: a systematic literature review. SA J Hum Resour Manag 2012;10(2):1–18. DOI: 10.4102/sajhrm.v10i2.415
  6. Liad W, Johar GV. Products as self-evaluation standards: when owned and unowned products have opposite effects on self-judgment. J Consum Res 2016;42(6):915–930. DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucv097
  7. Jami A, Kouchaki M, Gino F. I own, so I help out: how psychological ownership increases prosocial behavior. J Consum Res 2021;47(5):698–715. DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucaa040
  8. Avey J, Avolio B, Crossley C, et al. Psychological ownership: theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. J Organiz Behav 2009;30(2):173–191. DOI: 10.1002/job.583
  9. Billig M. Is my home my castle? place attachment, risk perception, and religious faith. Environ Behav10.1177/0013916505277608 2006;38(2):248–265. DOI:
  10. Morewedge CK, Shu LL, Gilbert DT, et al. Bad riddance or good rubbish? Ownership and not loss aversion causes the endowment effect. J Exp Soc Psychol 2009;45(4):947–995. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.014
  11. Peck J, Shu SB. The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. J Consum Res 2009;36(3):434–447. DOI: 10.1086/598614
  12. Shu SB, Peck J. Psychological ownership and affective reaction: emotional attachment process variables and the endowment effect. J Consum Psychol 2011;21(4):439–452. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.01.002
  13. Dyne LV, Pierce JL. Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behaviour. J Organiz Behav 2004;25(4):439–459. DOI: 10.1002/job.249
  14. Dawkins S, Tian A, Newman A, et al. Psychological ownership: a review and research agenda. J Organiz Behav 2015;38(2):163–183. DOI: 10.1002/job.2057
  15. Hartig T, Kaiser FG, Bowler PA. Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environ Behav 2001;33(4):590–607. DOI: 10.1177/00139160121973142
  16. Scannell L, Giford R. The experienced psychological benefits of place attachment. J Environ Psychol 2017;51:256–269. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.001
  17. Joo J. Customers’ psychological ownership toward the third place. Serv Bus 2020;14:333–360. DOI: 10.1007/s11628-020-00418-5
  18. Cloninger R. Character strengths and virtues: a handbook and classification. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162(4):820–821.
  19. Luthans F. Positive organizational behavior: developing and managing psychological strengths. Acad Manag Perspect 2002;16(1):57–72.
  20. Paré G, Sicotte C, Jacques H. The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians’ acceptance of clinical information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13(2):197–205. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1930
  21. Asatryan VS, Oh K. Psychological ownership theory: an exploratory application in the restaurant industry. J Hospit Tourism 2008;32(3):363–386. DOI: 10.1177/109634800831739
  22. Schirle L, McCabe BE, Mitrani V. The relationship between practice environment and psychological ownership in advanced practice nurses. West J Nurs Res 2019;41(1):6–24. DOI: 10.1177/0193945918754496
  23. Muthu MS, Vignesh KC, Nirmal L, et al. Embracing psychological ownership in dental education: a potential game changer. Contemp Clin Dent 2021;12(2):205–207. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_1023_20
  24. Karnilowicz W. Identity and psychological ownership in chronic illness and disease state. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2011;20(2):276–282. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2010.01220.x
  25. Masson V, Snell L, Dolmans D, et al. Exploring the evolving concept of ‘patient ownership’ in the era of resident duty hour regulations-experience of residents and faculty in an internal medicine night float system. Perspect Med Educ 2019;8(6):353–359. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-019-00540-9
  26. Schmitz JA. What determines productivity? Lessons from the dramatic recovery of the U.S. and Canadian iron ore industries following their early 1980s crisis. J Polit Econ 2005;113(3):582–625.
  27. Pierce JL, Rodgers L. The psychology of ownership and worker-owner productivity. Group Org Manag 2004;29(5):588–613. DOI: 10.1177/1059601103254270
  28. Hamid NZA, Hassan N. The relationship between workplace environment and job performance in selected government offices in Shah Alam, Selangor. Int J Manag Bus Res 2015;4(3):845–851.
  29. Finkbeiner BL. Four-handed dentistry revisited. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020;1(4):1–9.
  30. Dalai DR, Bhaskar DJ, Agali RC, et al. Four handed dentistry: an indispensable part for efficient clinical practice. Int J Adv Health Sci 2014;1(1):16–20.
  31. Horst JA, Clark MD, Lee AH. Observation, assisting, apprenticeship: cycles of visual and kinesthetic learning in dental education. J Dent Educ 2009;73(8):919–933.
  32. Carroll C, O'Loughlin D. Peer observation of teaching: enhancing academic engagement for new participants. Innov Educ Teach Int 2014;51(4):446–456. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2013.778067
  33. Fletcher LH, Orsmond P. Evaluating our peers: is peer observation a meaningful process? Stud High Educ 2004;29(4):489–503. DOI: 10.1080/0307507042000236380
  34. Drew S, Phelan L, Lindsay K, et al. Formative observation of teaching: focusing peer assistance on teachers’ developmental goals. Assess Eval High Educ 2017;42(6):914–929. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1209733
  35. Pandey P. The impact of work environment on employees’ productivity. Master's Thesis 2017;1–141.
  36. Collier R. Professionalism: what is it? CMAJ 2012;184(10):1129–1130. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4211
  37. Stup R. Control the factors that influence employee success. Managing the Hispanic Workforce Conference. Cornell University and Pennsylvania State University. 2003.
  38. Holmes JT, Schmitz JA. Competition and Productivity: A Review of Evidence. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Staff Report 439. 2010.
  39. Taylor FW. The principles of scientific management. Harper and Brothers. 1911.
  40. Chandrasekar K. Workplace environment and its impact on organizational performance in public sector organizational. Int J Enterp Comput Bus Syst 2011:1(1).
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.