International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2024 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Technological Advancement in Space Management—Prefabricated Space Maintainers: A Case Series

Mridula Goswami, Smriti Johar, Anusha Khokhar, Neha Chauhan, Ravita Bidhan, Vashi Narula

Keywords : Band and loop, Case report, Prefabricated band and loop, Space maintainers

Citation Information : Goswami M, Johar S, Khokhar A, Chauhan N, Bidhan R, Narula V. Technological Advancement in Space Management—Prefabricated Space Maintainers: A Case Series. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024; 17 (2):191-197.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2762

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 22-04-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Premature loss of primary teeth in children may lead to space loss in the arch, which leads to the collapse of vertical and horizontal occlusal relationships in primary and permanent dentitions. The ideal method to preserve the space in the arch in such a scenario is to use a space maintainer appliance. Conventionally, band and loop space maintainers are the most commonly used space maintainers. However, these are associated with certain drawbacks, such as multiple appointments and extended time for fabrication. A novel invention in the form of prefabricated bands and loops has been made to offset these disadvantages. Placement of prefabricated bands and loops decreases the chairside time and omits multiple visits, hence aiding in better behavior management for the child. The present case series discusses five cases of prefabricated band and loop placement in pediatric patients.


PDF Share
  1. Khanna P, Sunda S, Mittal S. “Keep my space”- a review article. Int J Oral Health Dent 2015; 1(1):11–15.
  2. Baroni C, Franchini A, Rimondini L. Survival of different types of space maintainers. Pediatr Dent 1994;16(5):360–361.
  3. Kirzioglu Z, Ozay MS. Success of reinforced fiber material space maintainers. J Dent Child 2004;71(2):158–162.
  4. Baume LJ. Physiological tooth migration and its significance for the development of occlusion. I. The biogenetic course of the deciduous dentition. J Dent Res 1950;29(2):123–132. DOI: 10.1177/00220345500290020301
  5. Al-Shamahy HA, Al-Dossary OAE, Al-Haddad K, et al. Malocclusion and premature teeth loss: its prevalence and association among Yemeni school children in Sana'a. J Oral Med Dent Res 2021;2:14. DOI: 10.52793/JOMDR.2020.2(2)-18
  6. Tunison W, Flores-Mir C, ElBadrawy H, et al. Dental arch space changes following premature loss of primary first molars: a systematic review. Pediatr Dent 2008;30(4):297–302.
  7. Singh PH, Naorem H, Devi TC, et al. Modern concepts of space maintainers and space regainers: a review article. Eur J Pharmaceut Med Res 2020;150(2):16–17.
  8. Sami Malik A, Maha AK, Ammar SA. Evaluation of clinical success and survival rates of different types of space maintainers used in pediatric dentistry. J Adv Med Res 2014;4(4):1–10.
  9. Seraj B, Jabbarian R, Batebi M. Space maintenance in pediatric dentistry: concepts and methods. Int J Dent Res 2021;3(2):1–7.
  10. Chawla HS, Kaur P, Shamsudheen M. Modified space maintainers. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 1985;3(1):48–49.
  11. Setia V, Kumar Pandit I, Srivastava N, et al. Banded vs bonded space maintainers: finding better way out. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(2):97–104. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1245
  12. Tahririan D, Safaripour M, Eshghi A, et al. Comparison of the longevity of prefabricated and conventional band and loops in children's primary teeth. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2019;16(6):428–434.
  13. Rajwar AS, Goswami M. Prevalence of dental fear and its causes using three measurement scales among children in New Delhi. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2017;35(2):128–133. DOI: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_135_16
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.