International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2024 ) > List of Articles


Don't Rush with Your Brush: An In Vitro Study on Toothbrush Hygiene

Surbhi Sharma, Sandeep Tandon, Tripti S Rai, Rinku Mathur, Ambika S Rathore, Sumedha Gupta

Keywords : Audiovisual aid, Disinfectant, Microbial count, Parental education, Toothbrush hygiene

Citation Information : Sharma S, Tandon S, Rai TS, Mathur R, Rathore AS, Gupta S. Don't Rush with Your Brush: An In Vitro Study on Toothbrush Hygiene. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024; 17 (2):162-167.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2776

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 22-04-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of audiovisual (AV) aids in creating awareness of toothbrush hygiene. Materials and methods: This randomized trial study was conducted on 40 children aged 6–11 years. Children were given soft toothbrushes and then collected after brushing for 14 days. The toothbrushes were collected and sent to the laboratory for microbial culture evaluation. A questionnaire consisting of various questions regarding daily toothbrush hygiene practices was filled by the parents at the same time. After 14 days, brushes were collected, and the parents were shown an AV aid regarding toothbrush decontamination, parental awareness, and supervision. Those children were given new sets of toothbrushes and instructed to decontaminate them with chlorhexidine solution. After 14 days, the same questionnaire was filled out by the parents and toothbrushes were collected and immediately sent to the laboratory for microbial culture evaluation. Results: All the sampled toothbrushes had significant (p < 0.001) bacterial growth after 14 days of use. The use of disinfectant led to a 99.98% reduction in microbial colony counts. Hence, showed a significant result. Questionnaire analysis showed a positive parental approach toward maintaining toothbrush hygiene. Conclusion: Cleaning and disinfection of toothbrushes is crucial to stop the spread of disease since bacterial contamination cannot be 100% eliminated. AV aids can be effective tools for increasing awareness. Clinical significance: Through this study, we want to emphasize toothbrush hygiene and create awareness for the same through AV aid because a healthy toothbrush leads to healthy oral health.

PDF Share
  1. Agrawal S, Dahal S, Bhumika TV, et al. Evaluating sanitization of toothbrushes using various decontamination methods: a meta-analysis. J Nepal Health Res Council 2018;16(41):364–371. DOI: 10.33314/jnhrc.v16i41.1198
  2. Basman A, Peker I, Akca G, et al. Evaluation of toothbrush disinfection via different methods. Braz Oral Res 2016;30:S1806–S83242016000100203. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0006
  3. Assari A S, Mohammed Mahrous M, Ahmad YA, et al. Efficacy of different sterilization techniques for toothbrush decontamination: an ex vivo study. Cureus 2022;14(1):e21117. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21117
  4. Srinivas K, Geetha RV. Estimation of bacterial contamination on toothbrush used by different students for a different time period. J Pharmaceut Res Int 2021;33(48B):304–311. DOI: 10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i48B33288
  5. Turner LA, McCombs GB, Hynes WL, et al. A novel approach to controlling bacterial contamination on toothbrushes: chlorhexidine coating. Int J Dent Hyg 2009;7(4):241–245. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00352.x
  6. Karibasappa GN, Nagesh L, Sujatha BK. Assessment of microbial contamination of toothbrush head: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22(1):2–5. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.79965
  7. Prasad AS, Sivakumar A. Do audiovisual aids help in improving oral hygiene in orthodontic patients? J Evol Med Dent Sci 2021;10(22):1667–1672. DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2021/346
  8. Terézhalmy G, Biesbrock AR, Walters PA, et al. Clinical evaluation of brushing time and plaque removal potential of two manual toothbrushes. Int J Dent Hyg 2008;6(4):321–327. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00327.x
  9. Oral-B. Last accessed September 9, 2008.
  10. Colgate. Colgate. HealthCenter/OralHygieneBasics/HowtoBrush.cvsp?Article=HowTo Brush. Last accessed September 9, 2008.
  11. Philips. es/flexcare/c_flex_t1.asp. Last accessed September 9, 2008.
  12. Joy T, Venugopal S, Sadanandan S, et al. Evaluation of microbial contamination of toothbrushes and their decontamination using various disinfectants: an in vitro study. J Indian Assoc Pub Health Dent 2022;20(2):200–205. DOI: 10.4103/jiaphd.jiaphd_113_21
  13. Brook I, Gober AE. Persistence of group A betahemolytic streptococci in toothbrushes and removable orthodontic appliances following treatment of pharyngotonsillitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124(9):993–995. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.124.9.993
  14. Fischer H. Contaminated toothbrushes and pharyngitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125(4):479.
  15. Sconyers JR, Crawford JJ, Moriarty JD. Relationship of bacteremia to toothbrushing in patients with periodontitis. J Am Dent Assoc 1973;87(3):616–622. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1973.0453
  16. Azimi M, Jouybari L, Moghadam S, et al. Antimicrobial effects of chlorhexidine, matrica drop mouthwash (chamomile extract), and normal saline on hospitalized patients with endotracheal tubes. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2016;21(5):458–463. DOI: 10.4103/1735-9066.193390
  17. Peker I, Akca G, Sarikir C, et al. Effectiveness of alternative methods for toothbrush disinfection: an in vitro study. Sci World J 2014;2014. DOI: 10.1155/2014/726190
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.