Citation Information :
Gugawad S, Patil SV. To Assess the Cariogenicity of the Lunch Box Content of Schoolgoing Children of Karad: A Cross-sectional Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024; 17 (2):121-124.
Aim: The present study was conducted to identify the main foods and beverages consumed at primary school and also to explore the information regarding cariogenic food consumption patterns of children in the school.
Materials and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 150 schoolgoing children of age 6–9 years of an English medium school in Karad. Respondents were asked about the type of daily food consumption at breakfast, lunch, and dinner using a 24-hour diet chart, and the lunch box of children was viewed at the time of lunch break to assess for carbohydrate-rich diet.
Results: Majority of the students (58.6%) were boys, from class IV (25.4%) and class III (25.4%), and were between 20 and 25 kg (48%) and 116 and 130 cm (42%). It was observed that the most frequently consumed food in the lunch box was chapati/paratha and vegetables (45%) followed by poha/upma (28%) and biscuits (22%). Almost half of the students (46%) were in the category of “watch-out zone,” that is, >15 sugar exposure.
Conclusion: Most of the food consumed in school was homemade and was less cariogenic. Beverages were less consumed by the students in the school time.
Clinical significance: Since dental caries is a chronic infectious disease affecting more than two-thirds of all children and the incidence of caries is directly related to “form” or “physical consistency” of the sugar-containing foods, the content of lunch box should be considered a priority for health promotion efforts among children.
American Dietetic Association. Position paper: nutrition and oral health. J Am Diet Assoc 2003;5:615–625.
Newbrun E. Sucrose, the arch criminal of dental caries. Odontol Revy 1967;18(4): 373–386.
Frostell G, Birkhed D, Edwardsson S, et al. Effect of partial substitution of invert sugar for sucrose in combination with duraphat treatment on caries development in preschool children: the Malmo study. Caries Res 1991;25(4):304–310. DOI: 10.1159/000261381
Rugg-Gunn AJ. Nutrition and Dental Health. Oxford University Press; 1993.
Birch LL, Fisher JO. Development of eating behaviors among children and adolescents. Pediatrics 1998;101(3 Pt 2):539–549.
Nicklas TA, Baranowski T, Baranowski JC, et al. Family and child-care provider influences on preschool children's fruit, juice, and vegetable consumption. Nutr Rev 2001;59(7):224–235. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2001.tb07014.x
Osera T, Tsutie S, Kobayashi M, et al. Relationship of mothers’ food preferences and attitudes with children's preferences. Food Nutr Sci 2012;3(10):1461–1466. DOI: 10.4236/fns.2012.310190
Dovey TM, Staples PA, Gibson EL, et al. Food neophobia and ‘picky/fussy’ eating in children: a review. Appetite 2008;50(2-3):181–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.009
Kubik MY, Lytle LA, Hannan PJ, et al. The association of the school food environment with dietary behaviors of young adolescents. Am J Public Health 2003;93(7):1168–1173. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.93.7.1168
Bamba S, Dogra V, Vikram S, et al. Prevalence of dental caries among school children according to the content of the lunch box. J Adv Med Dent Scie Res 2016;4(4):154–158. DOI: 10.21276/jamdsr.2016.4.4.32
Kelly B, Hardy LL, Howlett S, et al. Opening up Australian preschoolers’ lunchboxes. Aust N Z J Public Health 2010;34(3):288–292. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00528.x
Wyne AH, Khan N. Use of sweet snacks, soft drinks and fruit juices, tooth brushing and first dental visit in high DMFT 4-6 year olds of Riyadh region. Indian J Dent Res 1995;6(1):21–24.
Sanigorski AM, Bell AC, Kremer PJ, et al. Lunchbox contents of Australian school children: room for improvement. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59(11):1310–1316. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602244
Iftikhar A, Zafar M, Kalar MU. The relationship between snacking habits and dental caries in school children. Int J Collab Res Intern Med Public 2012;4(12):1943–1951.
Rees GA, Richards CJ, Gregory J. Food and nutrient intakes of primary school children: a comparison of school meals and packed lunches. J Hum Nutr Diet 2008;21(5):420–427. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2008.00885.x
Hubbard K, Must A, Eliasziw M, et al. What elementary schoolchildren bring from Home to Eat at School. J Acad Nutr Diet 2013;113(9):A91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.06.321
Sayegh A, Dini EL, Holt RD, et al. Food and drink consumption, sociodemographic factors and dental caries in 4-5-year-old children in Amman, Jordan. Br Dent J 2002;193(1):37–42. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801478
Sangster J, Ecdeston P, Stickney B. Improving what's in the lunchbox in child care centres. Health Promot J Austr 2003;14:777–774. DOI: 10.1071/HE03171
Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R, et al. Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev 2004;5(1):4–104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2004.00133.x
World Health Organization. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Geneva (CHE): WHO; 2003
Chutani AM. School lunch program in India: background, objectives and components. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2012;21(1):151–154.