Preserving Integrity: Investigating the Influence of Disinfecting Agents on Polymethylmethacrylate Dental Prosthesis Surface Characteristics in Children
Citation Information :
Kumar S, Saran R. Preserving Integrity: Investigating the Influence of Disinfecting Agents on Polymethylmethacrylate Dental Prosthesis Surface Characteristics in Children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024; 17 (12):1404-1408.
Introduction: In children, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is a commonly used material for fabrication of dental prostheses, such as obturators, removable space maintainers, habit-breaking appliances, removable orthodontic appliances, and removable partial and complete dentures. Regular cleaning of such prostheses is vital for maintaining the health of the oral tissues as well as the longevity of the prosthesis. The chemical method of disinfection, using different chemical cleansers, is commonly used for cleaning a dental prosthesis. Some of these disinfecting agents have been reported to alter the physical and mechanical properties of PMMA.
Aim: The aim of the study was to analyze the effect of two commonly used disinfecting agents on the surface roughness and surface hardness of two PMMA-based materials processed using different curing cycles.
Materials and methods: PMMA samples were made using short and long curing cycles. The surface roughness and hardness of the samples before and after immersion in the two disinfecting agents were recorded. A profilometer was used to measure surface roughness, whereas hardness was measured using the Vickers hardness tester.
Results: Both disinfecting agents increased the surface roughness and decreased the hardness of the PMMA samples. The effect was more profound in samples made using the short curing cycle.
Conclusion: It is important to select the appropriate disinfecting agents and follow the manufacturers’ instructions to ensure that the other properties of the prosthesis are not affected.
Kaur H, Thakur A. Applications of poly(methyl methacrylate) polymer in dentistry: a review. Mater Today Proc 2022;50:1619–1625. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.125
Zafar MS. Prosthodontic applications of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA): an update. Polymers (Basel) 2020;12:1–35. DOI: 10.3390/polym12102299
Verran J, Maryan CJ. Retention of Candida albicans on acrylic resin and silicone of different surface topography. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:535–539. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70148-3
Cavalcanti YW, Morse DJ, da Silva WJ, et al. Virulence and pathogenicity of Candida albicans is enhanced in biofilms containing oral bacteria. Biofouling 2015;31:27–38. DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2014.996143
Pellizzaro D, Polyzois G, Machado AL, et al. Effectiveness of mechanical brushing with different denture cleansing agents in reducing in vitro Candida albicans biofilm viability. Braz Dent J 2012;23:547–554. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-64402012000500013
Freitas-Fernandes FS, Cavalcanti YW, Filho APR, et al. Effect of daily use of an enzymatic denture cleanser on Candida albicans biofilms formed on polyamide and poly(methyl methacrylate) resins: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(6):1349–1355. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.004
Han Y, Liu X, Cai Y. Effects of two peroxide enzymatic denture cleaners on Candida albicans biofilms and denture surface. BMC Oral Health 2020;20:193. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01176-6
Mylonas P, Milward P, McAndrew R. Denture cleanliness and hygiene: an overview. Br Dent J 2022;233:20–26. DOI: 10.1038/s41415-022-4397-1
Machado AL, Breeding LC, Vergani CE, et al. Hardness and surface roughness of reline and denture base acrylic resins after repeated disinfection procedures. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:115–122. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60120-7
Pisani MX, da Silva CHL, Paranhos HDFO, et al. The effect of experimental denture cleanser solution Ricinus communis on acrylic resin properties. Mater Res 2010;13:369–373. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-14392010000300015
Moussa AR, Dehis WM, Elboraey AN, et al. A comparative clinical study of the effect of denture cleansing on the surface roughness and hardness of two denture base materials. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2016;4:476–481. DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2016.089
Marcillo-Toala OO, da Costa RB, Chappuis-Chocano AP, et al. Does continuous chemical disinfection affect mechanical properties of CAD/CAM PMMA? Int J Prosthodont 2023. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.8301s
Gurbuz O, Dikbas I, Unalan F. Fatigue resistance of acrylic resin denture base material reinforced with E-glass fibres. Gerodontology 2012;29:e710–e714. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00548.x
Consani RLX, Pucciarelli MGR, Mesquita MF, et al. Polymerization cycles on hardness and surface gloss of denture bases. Int J Contemp Dent Med Rev 2014;2014. DOI: 10.15713/ins.ijcdmr.8
Yatabe M, Seki H, Shirasu N, et al. Effect of the reducing agent on the oxygen-inhibited layer of the cross-linked reline material. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:180–185. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00634.x
Ozyilmaz OY, Akin C. Effect of cleansers on denture base resins’ structural properties. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2019;17:228080001982779. DOI: 10.1177/2280800019827797
Firouz F, Izadi A, Khalesi M, et al. Assessment of effect of chemical disinfectants on surface roughness of heat-polymerized denture base acrylic resin. Avicenna J Clin Med 2012;19:57–60.
Consani RLX, Vieira ML, Mesquita MF, et al. Effect of polymerization cycles on the linear dimensional change, hardness and impact strength of denture base acrylic resins. Minerva Stomatol 2012;61:273–282.
Felipucci DNB, Davi LR, Paranhos HFO, et al. Effect of different cleansers on the surface of removable partial denture. Braz Dent J 2011;22:392–397. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-64402011000500008
Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258–269. DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3
Aldegheishem A, AlDeeb M, Al-Ahdal K, et al. Influence of reinforcing agents on the mechanical properties of denture base resin: a systematic review. Polymers (Basel) 2021;13:3083. DOI: 10.3390/polym13183083
Gungor H, Gundogdu M, Alkurt M, et al. Effect of polymerization cycles on flexural strengths and microhardness of different denture base materials. Dent Mater J 2017;36:168–173. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2016-023
Moslehifard E, Ghaffari T, Zarei K, et al. Evaluation of microhardness in two types of denture bases after using sodium hypochlorite and NatureDent disinfecting agents. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2022;16:196–203. DOI: 10.34172/joddd.2022.033
Rocha MM, Carvalho AM, Coimbra FCT, et al. Complete denture hygiene solutions: antibiofilm activity and effects on physical and mechanical properties of acrylic resin. J Appl Oral Sci 2021;29:e20200948. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0948
Pfeiffer P, Rosenbauer EU. Residual methyl methacrylate monomer, water sorption, and water solubility of hypoallergenic denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:72–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.04.003