International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Evaluation of Wear Strength and Compressive Strength of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants with a Nanofilled Resin Coating: An In Vitro Study

Rajasekar Gunasekaran, Ditto Sharmin, Gayathri Jaganathan, Vignesh Ravindran

Keywords : Coating, Caries, Compressive strength, Nanofilled resin, Pit and fissure sealant, Wear strength

Citation Information : Gunasekaran R, Sharmin D, Jaganathan G, Ravindran V. Comparative Evaluation of Wear Strength and Compressive Strength of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants with a Nanofilled Resin Coating: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024; 17 (1):31-35.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2726

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 14-03-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Introduction: The role of sealants for pits and fissures has been emphasized in caries prevention. Considering the advantages of a surface sealer and the effects of its application over restorative materials; the study is aimed at evaluating two pit and fissure sealants with a nanofilled resin coating. Materials and methods: In this in vitro double-blinded study, a total of 60 caries-free extracted third molars were collected and divided into two groups of 30 each receiving either a resin-based sealant (Helioseal F) or a glass ionomer-based sealant (GC Fuji VII). Each sample was then applied with GCoat Plus surface sealer. 15 samples each containing GC Fuji VII and 15 containing Helioseal F were then subjected to wear. Another 15 samples of GC Fuji VII and 15 of Helioseal F were subjected to compressive load. Results: On assessing the wear strength, the weight loss in group I (resin sealant with surface sealer) was 1.73 ± 0.50 (μg) which was statistically significant (p = 0.023). There was no significant difference in comparing the wear depth between both groups. There was a high statistically significant difference when assessing the compressive strength, group II (glass ionomer sealant with surface sealer) had 3566.4 ± 757 (μm) when compared to group I (resin sealant with surface sealer) 1568.53 ± 680 (p ≤ 0.01). Conclusion: Sealants are known for their poor retention and keeping that in mind we designed this study to evaluate the physical properties of sealants with a resin coating over them. Within the limitations of this study, the conclusions are glass ionomer sealant showed greater resistance to wear when compared to the resin-based sealant and the resin-based sealant showed higher compressive strength values than the glass ionomer sealant.


PDF Share
  1. Babu G, Mallikarjun S, Wilson B, et al. Pit and Fissure sealants in pediatric dentistry. SRM J Res Dent Sci 2015;5:253–257.
  2. Pardi V, Sinhoreti MAC, Pereira AC, et al. Fissure sealants: in vitro evaluation of abrasion wear and superficial roughness. Mat Res 2008;11(2):117–120. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-14392008000200002
  3. Kavaloglu Cildir S, Sandalli N. Compressive strength, surface roughness, fluoride release and recharge of four new fluoride-releasing fissure sealants. Dent Mater J 2007;26(3):335–341. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.26.335
  4. Pushpalatha HM, Ravichandra KS, Srikanth K, et al. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of different pit and fissure sealants in primary and permanent teeth - an in-vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2014;6(2):84–89.
  5. Lohbauer U, Kramer N, Siedschlag G, et al. Strength and wear resistance of a dental glass-ionomer cement with a novel nanofilled resin coating. Am J Dent 2011;24(2):124–128.
  6. Roberts JC, Powers JM, Craig RG. Wear of commercial pit and fissure sealants. J Dent Res 1977;56(6):692. DOI: 10.1177/00220345770560062101
  7. Rios D, Honorio HM, de Araújo PA, et al. Wear and superficial roughness of glass ionomer cements used as sealants after simulated tooth brushing. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2002;16(4):343–348. DOI: 10.1590/s1517-74912002000400011
  8. Nagarajan VS, Jahanmir S, Thompson VP. In vitro contract wear of dental composites. Dent Mater 2004;20(1):63–71. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(03)00069-1
  9. Bonifácio CC, Werner A, Kleverlaan CJ. Coating glass-ionomer cements with a nanofilled resin. Acta Odontol Scand 2012;70(6):471–477. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2011.639307
  10. Bagheri R, Taha NA, Azar MR, et al. Effect of G-Coat Plus on the mechanical properties of glass-ionomer cements. Aust Dent J 2013;58(4):448–453. DOI: 10.1111/adj.12122
  11. Santos E Jr, Nascimento KDP, Camargo SS Jr. Relation between in-vitro wear and nanomechanical properties of commercial light-cured dental composites coated with surface sealants. Mat Res 2013;16(5):1148–1155. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-14392013005000097
  12. Galo R, Contente MMMG, Borsatto MC. Wear of two pit and fissure sealants in contact with primary teeth. Eur J Dent 2014;8(2):241–248. DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.130619
  13. Anagnostou M, Montouris G, Silikas N, et al. Chemical, mechanical and biological properties of contemporary composite surface sealers. Dent Mater 2015;31(12):1474–1486. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.015
  14. Wojda S, Szoka B, Sajewicz E. Tribological characteristics of enamel-dental material contacts investigated in vitro. Acta of Bioeng Biomech 2015;17(1):21–29.
  15. Conde A, Manieri V, Mota EG, et al. Influence of ultrasound and diamond burs treatment on microtensile bond strength. Indian J Dent Res 2012;23(3):373–377. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.102232
  16. Mahoney E, Holt A, Swain M, et al. The hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar teeth: an ultra-indentation study. J Dent 2010;28(8):589–594. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00043-9
  17. Sharmin D D, Thomas E. Evaluation of the effect of storage medium on fragment reattachment. Dent Traumatol 2013;29(2):99–102. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2012.01143.x
  18. Koenraads H, van der Kroon G, Frencken JE. Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities. Dent Mater 2009;25(4):551–556. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.12.008
  19. Oba AA, Dulgergil T, Sonmez IS, et al. Comparison of caries prevention with glass ionomer and composite resin fissure sealants. J Formos Med Assoc 2009;108(11):844–848. DOI: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60415-0
  20. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Caries preventive effect of high viscosity glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealants on permanent teeth: a systematic review of clnical trials. PLoS ONE 2016;11(1):e0146512. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146512
  21. Forss H, Saarni UM, Seppa L. Comparison of glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealants: a 2 year clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22(1):21–24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1994.tb01563.x
  22. Hankins AD, Hatch RH, Benson JH, et al. The effect of a nanofilled resin-based coating on water absorption by teeth restored with glass ionomer. JADA 2014;145(4):363–370. DOI: 10.14219/jada.2043.3
  23. Oilo G. Biodegradation of dental composites/glass ionomer cements. Adv Dent Res 1992;6:50–54. DOI: 10.1177/08959374920060011701
  24. Turssi CP, Hara AT, Serra MC, et al. Effect of storage media upon the surface micromorphology of resin-based restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29(9):864–871. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00926.x
  25. Mair LH, Stolarski TA, Vowles RW, et al. Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop. J Dent 1996;24(1-2):141–148. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(95)00043-7
  26. International Standards Organization. ISO/FDIS 9917-1:2003.
  27. Reena RK, Gill S, Miglani A. Storage Media: a neglected variable for in vitro studies. J Ind Ortho Soc 2011;45(1):5–8. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10021-1002
  28. Forss H, Halme E. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26(1):21–25.
  29. Bates JF, Stafford GD, Harrison A. Masticatory function-a review of the literature. 1. The form of the masticatory cycle. J Oral Rehabil 1975;2(3):281–301. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1975.tb00921.x
  30. Mejäre I, Mjör IA. Glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a clinical study. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98(4):345–350. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1990.tb00983.x
  31. Poulsen S, Beiruti N, Sadat N. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001;29(4):298–301. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290409.x
  32. Songpaisan Y, Bratthall D, Phantumvanit P, et al. Effects of glass ionomer cement, resin-based pit and fissure sealant and HF applications on occlusal caries in a developing country field trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1995;23(1):25–29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1995.tb00193.x
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.