Comparative Evaluation of Penetration Depth of Irrigants into Root Dentin after Manual Sonic and Ultrasonic Activation using Dye Penetration Method under Light Microscope: An In Vitro Study
Aim: To evaluate the penetration depth of irrigants into root dentin after manual, ultrasonic, and sonic activation using the dye penetration method under light microscope.
Materials and methods: Ninety-two extracted single-rooted human teeth were used in the age range of 14–18 years. After access opening, root canals were instrumented. Canals were irrigated with preheated 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Teeth were divided into four groups—group I, control group without activation; group II, manual dynamic activation; group III, ultrasonic activation; and group IV, sonic activation. About 1% methylene blue dye was used, which was activated for 30 seconds using the respective activation method. Cross sections of apical 1 mm were prepared from the apical third. Each section was examined under a light microscope to check the penetration depth of dye in a micrometer at the apical third level.
Results: There was a statistically highly significant difference seen for the values between the groups (p < 0.01) with higher values in group IV and least in group I, revealing that group IV had higher penetration depth compared to other groups.
Conclusion: The use of needle irrigation with the use of EndoActivator (sonic agitation method) has enhanced irrigation in the apical third.
Clinical significance: As during biomechanical preparation and irrigation with the traditional method of needle and syringe, canals remain inadequately disinfected at the apical third level. So, this study was done to assess whether the advanced methods of activation are more effective than commonly used techniques in their ability to penetrate dentinal tubules.
Paque F, Balmer M, Attin T, et al. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 2010;36(4):703–707. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.020
Möller AJ, Fabricius L, Dahlén G, et al. Influence on periapical tissues of indigenous oral bacteria and necrotic pulp tissue in monkeys. Scand J Dent Res 1981;89(6):475–484. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1981.tb01711.x
Grande NM, Plotino G, Butti A, et al. Cross-sectional analysis of root canals prepared with NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel reciprocating files. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103(1):120–126. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.022
Ram Z. Effectiveness of root canal irrigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977;44(2):306–312. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(77)90285-7
Siqueira JF Jr, Lima KC, Magalhaes FA, et al. Mechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal by three instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1999;25(5):332–335. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81166-0
Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006;32(5):389–398. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.014
Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, et al. Influence of the oscillation direction of an ultrasonic file on the cleaning efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation. J Endod 2010;36(8):1372–1376. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.019
Sabins RA, Johnson JD, Hellstein JW. A comparison of the cleaning efficacy of short-term sonic and ultrasonic passive irrigation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. J Endod 2003;29(10):674–678. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200310000-00016
Boutsioukis C, Gogos C, Verhaagen B, et al. The effect of apical preparation size on irrigant flow in root canals evaluated using an unsteady computational fluid dynamics model. Int Endod J 2010;43(10):874–881. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01761.x
Gulabivala K, Ng YL, Gilbertson M, et al. The fluid mechanics of root canal irrigation. Physiol Meas 2010;31(12):R49–R84. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/12/R01
Stewart GG. The importance of chemomechanical preparation of the root canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1955;8(9):993–997. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(55)90303-0
de Gregorio C, Estevez R, Cisneros R. Efficacy of different irrigation and activation systems on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals and up to working length: an in vitro study. J Endod 2010;36(7):1216–1221. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.019
Haikel Y, Wittenmeyer W, Bateman G, et al. A new method for the quantitative analysis of endodontic microleakage. J Endod 1999;25(3):172–177. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80136-8
Rossi-Fedele G, Guastalli AR, Doğramacı EJ, et al. Influence of pH changes on chlorine-containing endodontic irrigating solutions. Int Endod J 2011;44(9):792–799. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01911.x
Grossman LI. Irrigation of root canals. J Am Dent Assoc 1943;30(23):1915–1917. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1943.0397
Goodman A, Reader A, Beck M, et al. An in vitro comparison of the efficacy of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars. J Endod 1985;11(6):249–256. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80180-1
Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Sundqvist G, et al. Influence of residual bacteria on periapical tissue healing after chemomechanical treatment and root filling of experimentally infected monkey teeth. Euro J Oral Sci 2006;114(4):278–285. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00380.x
Niu LN, Luo XJ, Li GH, et al. Effects of different sonic activation protocols on debridement efficacy in teeth with single-rooted canals. J Dent 2014;42(8):1001–1009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.007