International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  16 (2023)
Volume  15 (2022)
Volume  14 (2021)
Volume  13 (2020)
Volume  12 (2019)
Volume  11 (2018)
Volume  10 (2017)
Volume  9 (2016)
Volume  8 (2015)
Volume  7 (2014)
Volume  6 (2013)
Volume  5 (2012)
Volume  4 (2011)
Volume  3 (2010)
Volume  2 (2009)
Volume  1 (2008)
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE S2 ( September, 2023 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Six Root Canals in Primary Mandibular Second Molar: Report of Two Cases

Mayur S Bhattad, MS Muthu, Vaibhav Wani, Sneha M Bhattad

Keywords : Case report, Cone-beam computed tomography, Middle mesial and middle distal canal, Pediatric rotary endodontics, Pulpectomy

Citation Information :

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2661

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-11-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Anatomical variations in root morphology have been frequently encountered in pediatric endodontic practice. Due to insufficient knowledge of canal anatomy in primary teeth, having unusual canal morphologies is possibly more prone to endodontic treatment failures. Advanced investigations have given the clinician an open handed chance to recognize those variations and thus effectively manage them to achieve desired results. This paper describes the mandibular primary second molar requiring pulp therapy having three separate and distant canals in the mesial and distal root. Such additional canals were labeled as the middle mesial (MM) canal in the mesial root and the middle distal (MD) canal in the distal root. Additional canals were identified on clinical examination and multiangled radiographs and verified with the help of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. In primary second molars such additional canals are bizarre. This paper describes the bizarre variations that were seen on second deciduous molars.

HTML PDF Share
  1. Ahmed HM. Anatomical challenges, electronic working length determination and current developments in root canal preparation of primary molar teeth. Int Endod J 2013;46(11):1011–1022. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12134
  2. Cleghorn BM, Boorberg NB, Christie WH. Primary human teeth and their root canal systems. Endod Top 2012;23(1):6–33. DOI: 10.1111/etp.12000
  3. Al-Hadlaq SM, Aljarbou FA, AlThumairy RI. Evaluation of cyclic flexural fatigue of M-wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 36(2):305–307. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.032
  4. Reuben J, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. The evaluation of root canal morphology of the mandibular first molar in an Indian population using spiral computed tomography scan: an in vitro study. J Endod 2008;34(2):212–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.018
  5. Garg AK, Tewari RK, Kumar A, et al. Prevalence of three rooted mandibular permanent first molars among the Indian population. J Endod 2010;36(8):1302–1306. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.019
  6. Ahmed SAB, Pawar MG. An in vivo study of variations in the canal anatomy of maxillary and mandibular first molar using surgical operating microscope. World J Dent 2013;4(1):47–55. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1201
  7. Ghoddusi N, Naghavi M, Zarei ER, et al. Mandibular first molar with four distal canals. J Endod 2007;33(12):1481–1483. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.08.018
  8. Kavanagh C, O'Sullivan VR. Four-rooted primary upper second molar. Int J Paediatr Dent 1998;8(4):279–282. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-263x.1998.00093.x
  9. Sarkar S, Rao AP. Number of root canals, their shape, configuration, accessory root canals in the radicular pulp morphology. A preliminary study. J Ind Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2002;20(3):93–97.
  10. Zoremchhingi, Joseph T, Varma B. A study of root canal morphology of human primary molars using computerized tomography: an in vitro study. J Ind Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2005;23(1):7–12. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.16019
  11. Rana V, Shafi S, Gambhir N, et al. Deciduous mandibular second molar with supernumerary roots and root canals associated with missing mandibular permanent premolar. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011;4(2):167–169. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1104
  12. Sim D, Mah Y. A study of root canals morphology in primary molars using computerized tomography. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2019;46(4):400–408. DOI: 10.5933/JKAPD.2019.46.4.400
  13. Wang YL, Chang HH, Kuo CI, et al. A study on the root canal morphology of primary molars by high-resolution computed tomography. J Dent Sci 2013;8(3):321–327. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2013.04.002
  14. Patil A, Shigli A, Tamagond SB, et al. Missed canal … call from radix entomolaris. BMJ Case Rep 2014;2014:bcr2013202204. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2013-202204
  15. Selvakumar H, Kavitha S, Bharathan R, et al. Five canalled and three-rooted primary second mandibular molar. Case Rep Dent 2014;2014:216491. DOI: 10.1155/2014/216491
  16. FJ V. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Top 2005;10:3–29.
  17. Fumes AC, Sousa-Neto MD, Leoni GB, et al. Root canal morphology of primary molars: a micro-computed tomography study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2014;15(5):317–326. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-014-0117-0
  18. Oenning AC, Jacobs R, Pauwels R, et al. Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol 2018;48(3):308–316. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-017-4012-9
  19. Kühnisch J, Anttonen V, Duggal MS, et al. Best clinical practice guidance for prescribing dental radiographs in children and adolescents: an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2020;21(4):375–386. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-019-00493-x
  20. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, et al. Endodontic application of cone-bean volumetric tomography. J Endod 2007;33(9):1121–1132. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.011
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.