International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2023 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Dento-skeletal Sequel of Hyrax in Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Udayakumar Deepika, Prayas Ray, Amit Nayak, Louis Soloman Simon, Manoranjan Mahakur, Moushmi Sahu

Keywords : Cleft palate rapid expansion, Rapid maxillary expansion cleft palate, Rapid palatal expansion in cleft palate with hyrax

Citation Information : Deepika U, Ray P, Nayak A, Simon LS, Mahakur M, Sahu M. Dento-skeletal Sequel of Hyrax in Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023; 16 (6):882-896.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2716

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-02-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To critically evaluate and review the dento-skeletal outcomes of hyrax with or without nonsurgical protraction therapy in nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients. Materials and methods: Electronic databases were searched from PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, SciELO, Lilacs, and Google Scholar from January 2005 to April 2022 to identify studies reporting on the dento-skeletal effect of hyrax with or without nonsurgical protraction therapy among children aged 7–15 years with CLP before the secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) procedure. Abstracts and subsequently eligible full-text articles were screened. The risk of bias in the included randomized and nonrandomized studies was assessed using Cochrane collaboration's risk of bias tool. The random-effects meta-analyses of the mean difference were carried out. Results: A total of 423 studies were identified. After a thorough screening, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these 19 studies, 13 studies were conducted with only hyrax appliances, six studies had hyrax with nonsurgical protraction therapy. Conclusion: Hyrax had increased intermolar width, anterior nasal cavity width, and posterior maxillary width compared to inverted mini hyrax with p-values = 0.027, 0.004, and 0.03, respectively. Inverted mini hyrax had more canine inclination on noncleft than hyrax. Hyrax and fan-type expanders had an equivalent effect on the dento-skeletal structures indicating that hyrax can be used as an alternative to fan-type expanders. Hyrax with protraction therapy had a remarkable change in ANB angle compared to noncleft patients.


PDF Share
  1. Parker SE, Mai CT, Canfield MA, et al. Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2010;88(12):1008–1016. DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20735
  2. Figueiredo DS, Cardinal L, Bartolomeo FU, et al. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders. Dental Press J Orthod 2016;21(6):82–90. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.2016-001.aop
  3. Trindade IE, Castilho RL, Sampaio-Teixeira AC, et al. Effects of orthopedic rapid maxillary expansion on internal nasal dimension in children with cleft lip and palate assessed by acoustic rhinometry. J Craciofac Surg 2010;21(2):306–311. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cf5f5f
  4. Farronato G, Giannini L, Galbiati G, et al. Sagittal and vertical effects of rapid maxillary expansion in Class I, II, and III occlusions. Angle Orthod 2011;81(2):298–303. DOI: 10.2319/050410-241.1
  5. Hansen L, Tausche E, Hietschold V, et al. Skeletally-anchored rapid maxillary expansion using the Dresden distractor. J Orofac Orthop 2007;68(2):148–158. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-007-0643-z
  6. Pfaff W. Stenosis of the nasal cavity caused by contraction of the palatal arch and abnormal position of the teeth: treatment by expansion of the maxilla. Dental Cosmos 1905;47:570–573.
  7. Harzer W, Schneider M, Gedrange T. Rapid maxillary expansion with palatal anchorage of the hyrax expansion screw–pilot study with case presentation. J Orofac Orthop 2004;65(5):419–424. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-004-0346-7
  8. Vasant MR, Menon S, Kannan S. Maxillary expansion in cleft lip and palate using quad helix and rapid palatal expansion screw. Med J Armed Forces India 2009;65(2):150–153. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(09)80130-5
  9. Façanha AJ, Lara TS, Garib DG, et al. Transverse effect of Haas and Hyrax appliances on the upper dental arch in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: a comparative study. Dental Press J Orthod 2014;19(2):39–45. DOI: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.2.039-045.oar
  10. Figueiredo DS, Bartolomeo FU, Romualdo CR, et al. Dentoskeletal effects of 3 maxillary expanders in patients with clefts: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;146(1):73–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.04.013
  11. de Medeiros Alves AC, Garib DG, Janson G, et al. Analysis of the dentoalveolar effects of slow and rapid maxillary expansion in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate patients: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 2016;20(7):1837–1847. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1675-1
  12. Garib D, Lauris RC, Calil LR, et al. Dentoskeletal outcomes of a rapid maxillary expander with differential opening in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate: a prospective clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150(4):564–574. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.05.006
  13. Mordente CM, Palomo JM, Horta MC, et al. Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Angle Orthod 2016;85(4):617–624. DOI: 10.2319/032015-174.1
  14. Cardinal L, da Rosa Zimermann G, Mendes FM, et al. The impact of rapid maxillary expansion on maxillary first molar root morphology of cleft subjects. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22(1):369–376. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-017-2121-3
  15. Dogan E, Dogan S. The evaluation of the effects of rapid palatal expansion on nasomaxillary complex in patients with complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate. J Cleft Lip Palate Craniofac Anomal 2017;4:S173–S179.
  16. Sebaey AM, El-Bayomy SY, Khalefa YHA, et al. Rapid arch expansion in cleft lip and palate children: comparison between fan-type expander and Hyrax type expander using cone-beam computed tomography. Al-Azhar J Dent Sci 2018:21(1);27–35. DOI: 10.21608/EDJ.2019.73993
  17. Abdelrahman NI, El-Badawy FM. Oropharyngeal airway changes after rapid maxillary expansion in children with bilateral cleft lip and palate. Egypt Dent J 2020;66(1):41–44. DOI: 10.21608/EDJ.2020.77500
  18. Abdelrahman NI, Mostafa RA. Nasal chamber changes following rapid maxillary expansion in children with bilateral cleft lip and palate. Egypt Dent J 2020;66(1):45–50. DOI: 10.21608/EDJ.2020.77502
  19. Cardinal L, Figueiredo DSF, Bartolomeo FUC, et al. A prospective cohort study on the effects of RME in the mandibular dentition of cleft subjects. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2020;10(4):738–742. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.10.005
  20. Jia H, Li W, Lin J. Maxillary protraction effects on anterior crossbites. Repaired unilateral cleft versus noncleft prepubertal boys. Angle Orthod 2008;78(4):617–624. DOI: 10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0617:MPEOAC]2.0.CO;2
  21. Fu Z, Lin Y, Ma L, et al. Effects of maxillary protraction therapy on the pharyngeal airway in patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: a 3-dimensional computed tomographic study. Am J Orthod 2016;149(5):673–682. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.024
  22. Kecik D. Evaluation of protraction face-mask therapy on the craniofacial and upper airway morphology in unilateral cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg 2017;28(7):e627–e632. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003652
  23. Zhang Y, Jia H, Fu Z, et al. Dentoskeletal effects of facemask therapy in skeletal class III cleft patients with or without bone graft. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153(4):542–549. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.07.024
  24. Dogan E, Seckin O. Maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: evaluation of soft and hard tissues using the Alt-RAMEC protocol. J Orofac Orthop 2020;81(3):209–219. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-020-00220-y
  25. Elshal MG, Ghafar MMA, Makarem OA, et al. Three dimensional evaluations of airway changes after maxillary expansion and protraction using modified tandem appliance versus facemask in cleft lip and palate patients. Med Sci 2020;24(106):4532–4540.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.