International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 5 ( September-October, 2023 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Early Orthodontic Intervention in Cleft Lip–Palate and Noncleft Children with Developing Class III Malocclusion: A Clinical Study

Subhranshu S Sahoo, Jayanta K Dash, Prasanna K Sahoo, Surya K Das, Ratna R Baliarsingh

Keywords : Cleft lip and palate, Rapid maxillary expansion, Reverse pull headgear

Citation Information : Sahoo SS, Dash JK, Sahoo PK, Das SK, Baliarsingh RR. Early Orthodontic Intervention in Cleft Lip–Palate and Noncleft Children with Developing Class III Malocclusion: A Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023; 16 (5):716-723.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2667

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 10-11-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Context: Orthopedic correction of skeletal class III malocclusion in a growing patient is crucial as it can circumvent future surgical procedures. Aims: The aim of the study is to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of early orthodontic intervention of developing class III malocclusion. Settings and design: A final sample of 38 children in the age-group of 6–14 years having skeletal class III malocclusion was selected. Subjects were divided into two groups; group I—included 18 children (male—10, female—8) with surgically repaired cleft lip and palate and group II—20 children (male—14, female—6) without any cleft lip and palate. Materials and methods: Cemented rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliances with 11 mm hyrax screws were used in all patients. Elastic traction forces were applied to the reverse-pull headgear worn by the patients. Both pre- and posttreatment records along with lateral cephalograms were taken. Statistical analysis used: The pre- and posttreatment mean and standard deviation measurements of the angular and linear observations were statistically analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 13) and were correlated through independent t-test and paired t-test. Results: Following headgear therapy, improvement was greater in the cleft group than noncleft group with greater advancement of maxilla along with clockwise rotation of mandible in clefts. Conclusion: Protraction mechanics with expansion can be employed successfully in repaired cleft lip and palate and noncleft prepubertal children having developing class III malocclusion, showing concave profile, and retrusive maxilla. Key message: Accurate diagnosis and understanding of the individual growth pattern are crucial in the early interception of a class III malocclusion to achieve a more favorable facial profile.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Angle, Edward H. Classification of malocclusion. Dent Cosmos 1899;41(8):710–721.
  2. McNamara JA Jr. An orthopedic approach to the treatment of class III malocclusion in young patients. J Clin Orthod 1987;21(9):598–608.
  3. Bergamo AZ, Andrucioli MC, Romano FL, et al. Orthodontic-surgical treatment of class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry. Braz Dent J 2011;22(2):151–156. DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000200011
  4. Cozzani G. Extraoral traction and class III treatment. Am J Orthod 1981;80(6):638–650. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90266-9
  5. Bardach J, Klausner EC, Eisbach KJ. The relationship between lip pressure and facial growth after cleft lip repair: an experimental study. Cleft Palate J 1979;16(2):137–146.
  6. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118(4):404–413. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.109840
  7. Turley PK. Treatment of the class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and protraction. Seminars in Orthodontics 2007;13(3): 143–157. DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2007.05.005
  8. Baccetti T, McGill JS, Franchi L, et al. Skeletal effects of early treatment of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113(3):333–343. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70306-3
  9. Enemark H, Bolund S, Jørgensen I. Evaluation of unilateral cleft lip and palate treatment: long term results. Cleft Palate J 1990;27(4):354–361. DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569(1990)027<0354:eoucla>2.3.co;2
  10. Westwood PV, McNamara JA Jr, Bacetti T, et al. Long-term effects of class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123(3):306–320. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.44
  11. Ngan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, et al. Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction. Eur J Orthod 1996;18(2):151–168. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/18.2.151
  12. Sarver DM, Johnston MW. Skeletal changes in vertical and anterior displacement of the maxilla with bonded rapid palatal expansion appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95(6):462–466. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90409-5
  13. Ross RB. The clinical implications of facial growth in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1970;7:37–47.
  14. Sarnas KV, Rune B. Extraoral traction to the maxilla with face mask: a follow-up of 17 consecutively treated patients with and without cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1987;24(2):95–103.
  15. Jia H, Li W, Lin J. Maxillary protraction effects on anterior crossbites. Repaired unilateral cleft versus noncleft prepubertal boys. Angle Orthod 2008;78(4):617–624. DOI: 10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0617:MPEOAC]2.0.CO;2
  16. Graber TM. A cephalometric analysis of the developmental pattern and facial morphology in cleft palate. Angle Orthod 1949;19(2): 91–100. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1949)019<0091:ACAOTD>2.0.CO;2
  17. Ishii H, Morita S, Takeuchi Y, et al. Treatment effect of combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in severe skeletal class III cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92(4):304–312. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90331-3
  18. Berkowitz S. Cleft lip and palate: perspectives in management. California: Singular Publishing Group; 1996.
  19. Liao YF, Mars M. Long-term effects of palate repair on craniofacial morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005;42(6):594–600. DOI: 10.1597/04-077r.1
  20. Tindlund RS, Rygh P. Soft-tissue profile changes during widening and protraction of the maxilla in patients with cleft lip and palate compared with normal growth and development. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30(5):454–468. DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0454_stpcdw_2.3.co_2
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.