Aims: To evaluate and compare three different treatment modalities in the management of deep carious lesions in primary molars.
Material and methods: A total of 60 primary molars from patients aged 4–9 years were randomly divided into three groups with 20 samples each. Sample in Group I received indirect pulp therapy with Mineral Trioxide Aggregate [MTA] as lining material, Group II received the modified Hall technique, and Group III MTA pulpotomy. The patients were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months as per evaluation criteria for success or failure of the same. A Chi-square test was used for proportions and for comparison between groups.
Results: Clinically, the success rate for the modified Hall technique and MTA pulpotomy was higher than indirect pulp therapy. Radiographically, the modified Hall technique had the highest success rate of 100 percent among the indirect pulp therapy and MTA pulpotomy. This success rate was however not statistically significant.
Conclusion: All three techniques had promising results clinically and radiographically. Since the results were not statistically significant, conservative treatment like Modified Hall's technique can be preferred over the surgical approach [MTA Pulpotomy].
Clinical significance: This study compares newer techniques called Hall's technique with traditional techniques like indirect pulp capping and MTA pulpotomy. Hall's technique is a quick and noninvasive procedure, which involves fitting the crown and seating it over the tooth without any caries removal/ tooth preparation and no local anesthesia is being practiced. In the present study Hall's technique showed higher rates of success compared to the other two procedures.
McDonald, Avery, Dean. Dentistry for the child and adolescent, 8th edition. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby 2004; p. 203. PMID: 16541910.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guidelines on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 2005;27(suppl):130–134.
Elderton RJ. New approach to cavity design with special reference to the class II lesion. Br Dent J 1984:157:421–427. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4805514
Rahimtoola S, van Amerongen E, Maher R, et al. Pain related to different ways of minimal intervention in the treatment of small caries lesions. ASDC J Dent Child 2000;67:123–127.
Sonmez D, Sari S, Cetinbaş T. A comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up. J Endod 2008;34(8):950-955. DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.009
Kidd EAM, Management of deep carious lesion. Br Dent J 2001;191:606–610. DOI: 10.1159/000077770
Anderson G. Effective treatment with indirect pulp capping. Dent Stud 1982;22–25. PMID: 6963233.
Frenkel G, Kaufman A, Ashkenazi M, Clinical and radiographic outcomes of pulpotomized primary molars treated with white or gray mineral trioxide aggregate and ferric sulfate–long-term follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012;37(2):137–141. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.37.2.j3h27p624u163868
Dimaggio JJ, Hawes RR. Continued evaluation of direct and indirect pulp capping [abstract]. IADR. 1963. Abstract 38
Nirschl RF, Avery D. Evaluation of new pulp capping agent in indirect pulp therapy. ASDC J Dent Child 1983;50:25–30. PMID: 6572196.
Coll JA, Josell S, Nassof S, et al. An evaluation of pulpal therapy in primary incisors. Pediatr Dent 1988;10:178. PMID: 3268802.
der Zee VV, van Amerongen WE. Short Communication: influence of preformed metal crowns (Hall technique) on the occlusal vertical dimension in the primary dentition. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2010;11(5):225–227. DOI: 10.1007/BF03262751
Farooq NS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, et al. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000;22(4);278–286. PMID: 10969431.
Zwain AM. Evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol for pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. Int Endod J 2010; 43(5):413–418. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01695.x
Odaba ME, Çinar C, Tulunoglu O, et al. New haemostatic agent's effect on the success of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2011;33:529–534. PMID: 22353416.
Mareddy A, Mallikarjun S, Shetty PV, et al. Histological evaluation of diode laser pulpotomy in dogs. J oral Laser App 2010;10:7–16. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/13218.7140
Agamy HA, Bakry NS, Mounir MF, et al. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2004:26:302–309. PMID: 15344622.
Naik S, Hegde AM. Mineral trioxide aggregate as pulpotomy agent in primary molars: an in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2005;23:136. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.16020
Farsi N, Alamoudi N, Balto K, et al. Success of mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005:29:307–311. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.29.4.n80t77w625118k73
Fuks AB. Current concepts in vital primary pulp therapy. Eur J Pediatr Dent 2002;3(3):115–120. PMID: 12870999.
Watts A, Paterson RC. Pulpal response to zinc oxide eugenol cement. Int Endo J 1987;20(2):82–86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1987.tb00593.x
Orhan A, Oz FT, Orhan K. Pulp exposure occurrence and outcomes after 1 or 2-visit indirect pulp therapy vs complete caries removal in primary and permanent molars. Pediatr Dent 2010;32(4):347–355. PMID: 20836956.