International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE S2 ( Special Issue-2 (Cariology), 2022 ) > List of Articles


Evaluation of Salivary Components and Dental Plaque in Relation to Dental Caries Status in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

R Manjushree, Latha Anandakrishna, Keerthi Prasad KS, Ashmitha K Shetty

Keywords : Dental caries, Dental plaque, Saliva, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Citation Information : Manjushree R, Anandakrishna L, Prasad KS K, Shetty AK. Evaluation of Salivary Components and Dental Plaque in Relation to Dental Caries Status in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022; 15 (S2):S121-S125.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2325

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 16-03-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Purpose: To evaluate the dental caries prevalence in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) as compared to healthy children and, to assess the salivary components (flow rate, glucose, α-Amylase, Streptococcus mutans) and dental plaque in relation to their dental caries status. Methods: Dental caries were estimated by using the DMFS index and dental plaque by Sillness and Loe plaque index. The following methods were used to assess the salivary components; draining method to determine the flow rate; glucose oxidase peroxidase method for glucose; substrate method for α-Amylase, Mitis Salivarius Bacitracin agar was used to culture Streptococcus mutans. Results: Caries prevalence was significantly lower in T1DM. In the diabetic group, a significant positive correlation was found between DMFS value and plaque, DMFS value and salivary glucose, and also with DMFS value and salivary α-Amylase. A significant negative correlation was found between the DMFS value and the unstimulated salivary flow rate. The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that decrease in the unstimulated salivary flow rate to be significantly associated with increasing DMFS values. Conclusion: The caries prevalence was found to be low in T1DM when compared to the healthy children, the cause for it being related to the low plaque scores. Low caries prevalence could also be due to the restriction of sucrose in their diet. Clinical significance: As clinicians, along with restoring the smiles of a child patient, we have to retrospectively analyze the factors involved in the causation of dental caries. Educating the parents and the child in regard to this will help prevent the occurrence of any new carious lesion.

  1. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2014;37(Supplement 1):S81–S90. DOI: 10.2337/dc14-S081
  2. International Diabetes Federation. ID/F Diabetes Atlas. 8th ed. International Diabetes Federation 2017.
  3. Ferizi L, Dragidella F, Spahiu L, et al. The influence of type 1 diabetes mellitus on dental caries and salivary composition. Int J Dent 2018:2018;5780916. DOI: 10.1155/2018/5780916
  4. Gupta VK, Malhotra S, Sharma V, et al. The influence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus on dental caries and salivary flow. Int J Chronic Dis 2014;2014:790898. DOI: 10.1155/2014/790898
  5. Scannapieco FA, Torres G, Levine MJ. Salivary α-amylase: role in dental plaque and caries formation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1993;4(3-4):301–307. DOI: 10.1177/10454411930040030701
  6. Teixeira JA, Santos Júnior VE, Melo Júnior PC, et al. Effects of a new nano-silver fluoride-containing dentifrice on demineralization of enamel and streptococcus mutans adhesion and acidogenicity. Int J Dent 2018;2018:1351925. DOI: 10.1155/2018/1351925
  7. Chase I, Berkowitz RJ, Mundorff-Shrestha SA, et al. Clinical outcomes for early childhood caries (ECC): the influence of salivary mutans streptococci levels. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2004;5(3):143–146.
  8. Bolgu Èl BS, Celenk S, Ayna BE, et al. Evaluation of caries risk factors and effects of a fluoride-releasing adhesive material in children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM): initial first-year results. Acta Odontol Scand 2004;62(5):289–292. DOI: 10.1080/00016350410001766
  9. M. L. Darby and M. M. Walsh, “Nutritional counseling,” in Dental Hygiene Theory and Practice, pp. 567–568, Saunders, 2nd edition, 2003.
  10. World Health Organization. World Health Organization Oral health surveys: basic methods; 2013.
  11. Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy: 3. Response to local treatmentActaOdontol Scand 1966;24(6):747–759. DOI: 10.3109/00016356609028739
  12. Meurman JH, Rantonen P. Salivary flow rate, buffering capacity, and yeast counts in 187 consecutive adult patients from Kuopio, Finland. Scand J Dent Res 1994;102(4):229–234. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1994.tb01185.x
  13. López ME, Colloca ME, Páez RG, et al. Salivary characteristics of diabetic children. Braz Dent J 2003;14(1):26–31. DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402003000100005
  14. Ladgotra A, Verma P, Raj SS. Estimation of salivary and serum biomarkers in diabetic and non diabetic patients-a comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10(6):ZC56–ZC61. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19135.7995
  15. Kamate WI, Vibhute NA, Baad RK. Estimation of DMFT, salivary streptococcus mutans count, flow rate, pH, and salivary total calcium content in pregnant and non-pregnant women: a prospective study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11(4):ZC147–ZC151. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24965.9516
  16. Berkowitz RJ, Turner J, Green P. Primary oral infection of infants with streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol 1980;25(4):221–224. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(80)90026-6
  17. Ben-Aryeh H, Cohen M, Kanter Y, et al. Salivary composition in diabetic patients. J Diabet Complications 1988;2(2):96–99. DOI: 10.1016/0891-6632(88)90011-6
  18. Sharon A, Ben-Aryeh H, Itzhak B, et al. Salivary composition in diabetic patients. Journal of oral medicine 1985;40(1):23–26.
  19. Malicka B, Kaczmarek U, Skośkiewicz-Malinowska K. Prevalence of xerostomia and the salivary flow rate in diabetic patients. Adv Clin Exp Med 2014;23(2):225–233. DOI: 10.17219/acem/37067
  20. Belazi MA, Galli-Tsinopoulou A, Drakoulakos D, et al. Salivary alterations in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Int J Paediatr Dent 1998;8(1):29–33. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-263x.1998.00057.x
  21. Miller SM. Saliva: new interest in a nontraditional specimen. Med Lab Observ 1993;25:31–35.
  22. Piras M, Hand AR, Mednieks MI, et al. Amylase and cyclic amp receptor protein expression in human diabetic parotid glands. J Oral Pathol Med 2010;39(9):715–721. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2010.00898.x
  23. FenolI-Palomares C, Muñoz-Montagud JV, Sanchiz V, et al. Unstimulated salivary flow rate, pH and buffer capacity of saliva in healthy volunteers. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2004;96(11):773–783. DOI: 10.4321/s1130-01082004001100005
  24. Marini I. Discovering an accessible enzyme: salivary α-amylase: prima digestio fit in ore: a didactic approach for high school students. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 2005;33(2):112–116. DOI: 10.1002/bmb.2005.494033022439
  25. Stephan RM, Hemmens ES. Studies of changes in pH. produced by pure cultures of oral micro-organisms. Some effects of mixing certain micro-organisms. J Dent Res 1947;26(1):15–41. DOI: 10.1177/00220345470260010201
  26. Guggenheim B. Extracellular polysaccharides and microbial plaque. Int Dent J 1970;20(4):657–678.
  27. Zero DT, van Houte J, Russo J. The intra-oral effect on enamel demineralization of extracellular matrix material synthesized from sucrose by streptococcus mutans. J Dent Res 1986;65(6):918–923. DOI: 10.1177/00220345860650061201
  28. Dibdin GH, Shellis RP. Physical and biochemical studies of streptococcus mutans sediments suggest new factors linking the cariogenicity of plaque with its extracellular polysaccharide content. J Dent Res 1988;67(6):890–895. DOI: 10.1177/00220345880670060101
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.