International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2022 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effectiveness of Oral Health Educational Methods among School Children Aged 5–16 Years in Improving their Oral Health Status: A Meta-analysis

Kashmira M Gurav, Vittaldas Shetty, Vineet Vinay, Ketaki Bhor, Chirayu Jain, Pallavi Divekar

Keywords : Audio–video presentations, Oral health education, Oral health promotion, Oral health talk, Oral hygiene, School children

Citation Information : Gurav KM, Shetty V, Vinay V, Bhor K, Jain C, Divekar P. Effectiveness of Oral Health Educational Methods among School Children Aged 5–16 Years in Improving their Oral Health Status: A Meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022; 15 (3):338-349.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2395

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-06-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: Oral health is an essential component of health throughout life. Two major oral diseases, dental caries and gingival conditions are prevalent in young population. School-based oral health education (OHE) programs with recognized technology and traditional lecturing could be strategic in promotion of oral health behavior in developed and developing countries. Aim: The aim of the study is to summarize existing evidence in order to evaluate the effectiveness of OHE programs in school children aged 5–16 years in improving their oral health status. Methodology: Clinical trials with school children between 5 and 16 years were included. Eligible studies were those which had outcomes as caries, plaque and gingival indices, and oral hygiene status. Articles published from 2010 to 2019 in English language from PubMed, Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ), and Google Scholar were searched. Forty-one articles were identified and relevance was determined by examining title and full article. Nine articles were included for qualitative synthesis and seven were eligible for meta-analysis. The risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane Handbook. A meta-analysis was done using Review Manager 5.3 software. Results: After the meta-analysis results for cumulative mean difference was found as 0.05 (–0.17, 0.27), –0.37 (–0.74, 0.00), –0.20 (–0.33, –0.07), and –0.17 (–0.73, 0.38) for plaque status, Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified (OHI-S), debris status, and dental caries, respectively showing a significant difference favoring the experimental group than traditional group. Conclusion: Interventions given by various aids like lectures, albums, models, flipcharts, leaflets, E-programs, games, drawings, and presentations proved effective in improving oral hygiene status and dental caries, but no reduction in plaque levels and gingival inflammation as compared to oral health talk/counseling by dentists.


PDF Share
  1. Chandrashekar BR, Suma S, Sukhabogi JR, et al. Oral health promotion among rural school children through teachers: an interventional study. Indian J Public Health 2014;58(4):235–240. DOI: 10.4103/0019-557X.146278
  2. Chandrashekar BR, Suma S, Kiran K, et al. The use of school teachers to promote oral hygiene in some secondary school students at Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India: a short term prospective pilot study. J Fam Community Med 2012;19(3):184–189. DOI: 10.4103/2230-8229.102319
  3. Shenoy RP, Sequeira PS. Effectiveness of a school dental education program in improving oral health knowledge and oral hygiene practices and status of 12- to 13-year-old school children. Indian J Dent Res 2010;21(2):253–259. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.66652
  4. D'Cruz AM, Aradhya S. Impact of oral health education on oral hygiene knowledge, practices, plaque control and gingival health of 13–15 year old school children in Bangalore city. Int J Dent Hygiene 2012;11(2);126–133. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00563.x
  5. Ganesh M, Shah S, Parikh D, et al. The effectiveness of a musical toothbrush for dental plaque removal: a comparative study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2012;30(2):139–155. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.99988
  6. Angelopoulou MV, Kavvadia K, Taoufik K, et al. Comparative clinical study testing the effectiveness of school based oral health education using experiential learning or traditional lecturing in 10 year-old children. BMC Oral Health 2015;15:51. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-015-0036-4
  7. Gauba A, Bal IS, Jain A, et al. School based oral health promotional intervention: effect on knowledge, practices and clinical oral health related parameters. Contemp Clin Dent 2013; 4(4):493–499.
  8. Malik A, Sabharwal S, Kumar A, et al. Implementation of game-based oral health education vs conventional oral health education on children's oral health-related knowledge and oral hygiene status. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(3):257–260. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1446
  9. Higgings JPT, Thompson SG. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley; 2008. Available from: http://www.cochrane.org. Accessed on 12th Feb 2020.
  10. John BJ, Asokan S, Shankar S. Evaluation of different health education interventions among preschoolers: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2013;31(2):96–99. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.115705
  11. Kumar Y, Asokan S, John B, et al. Effect of conventional and game-based teaching on oral health status of children: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Paediatr Dent 2015;8(2):123–126. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1297
  12. Sadana G, Gupta T, Aggarwal N, et al. Evaluation of the impact of oral health education on oral hygiene knowledge and plaque control of school-going children in the city of Amritsar. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2017;7(5):259–263. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_251_17
  13. Umamaheswari N, Asokan S, Thangakumaran S. Effectiveness of behavioral vaccine on the oral health of children in Komarapalayam, South India: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Contem Clin Dent 2017;8(3):352–356. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_152_17
  14. Al Bardaweel S, Dashash M. E-learning or educational leaflet: does it make a difference in oral health promotion? A clustered randomized trial. BMC Oral Health 2018;18(1):81. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-018-0540-4
  15. Christensen GJ. Special oral hygiene and preventive care for special needs. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136(8):1141–1143. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0319
  16. Flanders RA. Effectiveness of dental health educational programs in schools. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114(2):239–242. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1987.0033
  17. Monse B, Benzian H, Naliponguit E, et al. The Fit for School Health Outcome Study – a longitudinal survey to assess health impacts of an integrated school health programme in the Philippines. BMC Public Health 2013;13:256. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-256
  18. Duijster D, Monse B, Dimaisip-Nabuab J, et al. ‘Fit for school’ – a school-based water, sanitation and hygiene programme to improve child health: results from a longitudinal study in Cambodia, Indonesia and Lao PDR. BMC Public Health 2017;17(1):302. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4203-1
  19. Stein C, Santos N, Hilgert JB, et al. Effectiveness of oral health education on oral hygiene and dental caries in schoolchildren: systematic review and meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2017;46(1):30–37. DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12325
  20. De Farias IA, de Araujo Souza GC, Ferreira MÂ. A health education program for Brazilian public schoolchildren: the effects on dental health practice and oral health awareness. J Public Health Dent 2009;9(4):225–230. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2009.00127.x
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.