International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2022 ) > List of Articles


CBCT Analysis of Maxillary First Molar in Indian Population

Mohit Sharma, Shilpi Gupta, Deepak P Bhayya, Kanchi Upadhyay, Divya Pandya, Ankita Srivastava, Shweta Gupta

Keywords : CBCT laboratory study, Maxillary first molar, Root canal morphology, Variation

Citation Information : Sharma M, Gupta S, Bhayya DP, Upadhyay K, Pandya D, Srivastava A, Gupta S. CBCT Analysis of Maxillary First Molar in Indian Population. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022; 15 (3):258-262.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2375

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-06-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Aim: This study aimed to assess the variations in root canal morphology of permanent maxillary first molar with the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: One hundred extracted teeth were cleaned and arranged in U shape template mimicking natural arch in set of five teeth. These arches were scanned in CBCT and were analyzed by expert radiologist for number of roots, number of canals per root, and Vertucci classification. Result: A maximum number of permanent maxillary first molars had three roots, and only 2% had two roots. All the palatal roots and 99% of distobuccal roots had one canal, but one of the distobuccal roots had two canals. Incidence of two canals in MB root is more frequent (60%) than incidence of one canal. The most common type of Vertucci's classification for MB root is a type I, followed by type IV, type II, type VI, type V, type VII.

PDF Share
  1. Gaurav V, Srivastava N, Rana V, et al. A study of root canal morphology of human primary incisors and molars using cone beam computerized tomography: an in vitro study. J Ind Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2013;31(4):254–259. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.121827
  2. Shenoi RP, Ghule HM. CBCT analysis of canal configuration of the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first permanent molar teeth: an in vitro study. Contem Clin Dent 2012;3(4):234–237. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.103618
  3. Patel S, Dawood A, Whaites E, et al. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: Part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems. Int Endod J 2009;4(6):447–462. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01530.x
  4. Zhang R, Yang H, Yu X, et al. Use of CBCT to identify the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation. Int Endod J 2011;44(2):162–169. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01826.x
  5. Eder A, Kantor M, Nell A, et al. Root canal system in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar: an in vitro comparison study of computed tomography and histology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35(3):175–177. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/73909470
  6. Blattner TC, George N, Lee CC, et al. Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars: a pilot study. J Endod 2010;36(5):867–870 DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.023
  7. Rathi S, Patil J, Jaju PP. Detection of mesiobuccal canal in maxillary molars and distolingual canal in mandibular molars by dental CT: A retrospective study of 100 cases. Int J Dent 2010:291276. DOI: 10.1155/2010/291276
  8. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Ahuja R, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars in an Indian population. J Endod 2010;36(10): 1622–1667. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.07.006
  9. Yemi J, Lee SJ, Woo J. Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a Korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion. J Endod 2012;38(8): 1063–1068. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.025
  10. Alavi AM, Opasanon A, Ng YL, et al. Root and canal morphology of Thai maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2002;35(5):478–485. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00511.x
  11. Weine FS, Hayami S, Hata G, et al. Canal configuration of the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar of a Japanese sub-population. Int Endod J 1999;32(2):79–87. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00186.x
  12. Al Shalabi RM, Omer OE, Glennon J, et al. Root canal anatomy of maxillary first and second permanent molars. Int Endod J 2000;33(5):405–414. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00221.x
  13. Imura N, Hata GI, Toda T, et al. Two canals in mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molars. Int Endod J 1998;31(6):410–414. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1998.0169.x
  14. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral surg Oral med Oral pathol 1984;58(5):589–599. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(84)90085-9
  15. Caliskan ML, Pehlivan Y, Sepetciog lu F, et al. Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population. J Endod 1995;21(4):200–204. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80566-2
  16. Ghoddusi J, Javidi M, Vatanpour M. Two symmetrical maxillary first molars with two disto-buccal root canals. Iran Endod J 2006;1(2):73–77.
  17. Christie WH, Peikoff MD, Fogel HM. Maxillary molars with two palatal roots: a retrospective clinical study. J Endod 1991;17(2):80–84. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81613-4
  18. Weng et al. Root canal morphology of permanent maxillary teeth in the Han nationality in Chinese Guanzhong area: a new modified root canal staining technique. J Endod 2009;35(5):651–656. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.02.010
  19. Ng YL, Aung TH, Alavi A, et al. Root and canal morphology of Burmese maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2001;34(8):620–630. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00438.x
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.