International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Comparing Sterilization of Endodontic Hand Files by Four Different Methods: An In Vitro Study

Bilal Ameer, Amrut Bambawale, Yogesh Damade, Nikita Ajit Mannur

Keywords : Autoclave, Diode laser, Glass bead

Citation Information : Ameer B, Bambawale A, Damade Y, Mannur NA. Comparing Sterilization of Endodontic Hand Files by Four Different Methods: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022; 15 (2):149-152.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2346

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-04-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Aim and objective: The aim and objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of four various approaches of sterilizing endodontic hand files via Autoclave, Glass-bead sterilizer, Glutaraldehyde solution, and Diode laser. Materials and methods: Fifty-two k-files of size #25 and length 21 mm were taken for the study. All the 52 files were presterilized in an endodontic instrument box via autoclave. Bacillus stearothermophilus spore suspension was prepared and all the presterilized files were contaminated with stearothermophilus spore suspension in a sterile Petri dish under vacuum hood safety. Later, the test files were randomly divided into four groups of 13 each and subjected to four different methods of sterilization- Autoclave, Glass-bead sterilizer, Glutaraldehyde solution, and Diode laser. Files were then be placed in thioglycollate media containing test tubes and incubated in an incubator at 55°C and checked for turbidity at 3 days and 21 days. Result: The result revealed that there was no Turbidity present in test tubes on both the 3rd and 21st day for autoclave. In all the remaining sterilization procedures there was some amount of turbidity present. In terms of sterilization provided autoclave provides complete sterilization and glutaraldehyde solution is the least effective. The specificity of Bacillus stearothermophilus was then confirmed with a sugar test viz., starch hydrolysis test which gave a positive result confirming the presence of Bacillus stearothermophilus. Conclusion: We can conclude that autoclave is the perfect process of sterilization providing 100% sterility and although Glass-bead didn't provide 100% sterility, it can be used as an alternative if autoclave is not available.

  1. Woods R, Amerena V, David P, et al. Sterilization: part 1. Instrument preparation. FDI World 1996;5(2):7–10
  2. Kumar KV, Kiran Kumar KS, Supreetha S, et al. Pathological evaluation for sterilization of routinely used prosthodontic and endodontic instruments. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015;5(3):232–236. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0762.159962
  3. Linsuwanont P, Parashos P, Messer HH. Cleaning of rotary nickel–titanium endodontic instruments. Int Endod J 2004;37(1):19–28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00747.x
  4. Buchanan GD, Warren N. Single-use of endodontic hand files: perceptions and practise. J Infect Prev 2019;20(1):32–36. DOI: 10.1177/1757177418802356
  5. Aslam A, Panuganti V, Nanjundasetty JK, et al. Knowledge and attitude of endodontic postgraduate students toward sterilization of endodontic files: a cross-sectional study. Saudi Endod J 2014;4(1):18-22. DOI: 10.4103/1658-5984.127982
  6. Raju TB, Garapati S, Agrawal R, et al. Sterilizing endodontic files by four different sterilization methods to prevent cross-infection-an in-vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2013;5(6):108–112.
  7. Khademi JA, Clark D. Incommensurability in endodontics: the role of the endodontic triad. Dentistry today 2016;35(8):8–10.
  8. Castelo-Baz P, Martín-Biedma B, Ruíz-Pinon M, et al. Combined sodium hypochlorite and 940 nm diode laser treatment against mature E.faecalis biofilms in-vitro. J Lasers Med Sci 2012; 3(3):116–121.
  9. Lewis S, McIndoe AK. Cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of equipment. Anaesth Intensive Care Med 2004;5(11):360–363.
  10. Boyd RF, Hoeri BG. Basic Medical Microbiology, Ch.10. Sterilization and Disinfection. 3rd ed. Little Brown and Company; 1996. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-805299-0.00059-2
  11. Hurtt CA, Rossman LE. The sterilization of endodontic hand files. J Endod 1996;22(6):321–322 DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80268-8
  12. Ozalp N, Okte Z, Ozcelik B. The rapid sterilization of gutta-percha cones with sodium hypochlorite and glutaraldehyde. J Endod 2006;32(12):1202–1204. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.08.009.
  13. Moura-Netto DC, De Freitas Carvalho C, de Moura AA, et al. Influence of Nd:YAG and diode laser irradiation on apical sealing when associated with AH plus and EndoREZ endodontic cements. Photomed Laser Surg 2007;25(5):413–417. DOI: 10.1089/pho.2007.2083
  14. Bago I, Plečko V, Gabrić Pandurić D, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of a high-power diode laser, photo-activated disinfection, conventional and sonic activated irrigation during root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2013;46(4):339–347. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02120.x
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.