Background: Pulpectomy has gained popularity in the pediatric dental practice for preserving the primary teeth in its position until exfoliation. There has been a paradigm shift from using manual instrumentation to rotary instrumentation for canal preparation in primary teeth. While studies show that there is a reduction in the instrumentation time with the use of rotary instruments which in turn influences the behavior of the child, its direct effect on the behavior of the children has not been evaluated.
Aim: To compare the behavior of the children during manual and rotary instrumentation for pulpectomy in the primary molars.
Materials and methods: A single-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted in 88 children in any one of the mandibular primary molars indicated for pulpectomy. The canal preparation was done using manual K files and rotary ProTaper (44 children in each group). The influence of these instrumentation techniques on the children was assessed with three different scales- Frankl Behavior Rating Scale; Venham Interval Rating Scale; Wong Baker FACES Pain Scale for evaluating the behavior, anxiety, and the pain experienced by the children, respectively during canal preparation.
Results: A total of 88 participants, comprising 50 females and 38 males, participated in the study. An equal distribution of the participants with respect to age (p = 0.064), gender (p = 0.389), and teeth (p = 0.877) was observed between the groups. More cooperative behavior (p < 0.001); lesser anxiety levels (p < 0.001); lower intensity of pain (p < 0.001) were recorded in the children instrumented using Rotary files.
Conclusion: The present study concludes that it is preferable to use rotary instrumentation for primary canal preparation in pediatric practice as it has a more positive influence on the behavior of the children, which eventually determines the success of the treatment.
Clinical significance: With rise in the use of rotary files for pulpectomy in primary teeth, the present paper demonstrates the influence of rotary instrumentation technique for canal preparation during pulpectomy on the behavior of the children in a dental chair. This paper throws light for the pedodontists to effectively perform pulpectomy in children with ease without leaving a psychological impact on the children.
Ranly DM, Garcia-Godoy F. Current and potential pulp therapies for primary and young permanent teeth. J Dent 2000;28:153–161. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00065-2
Fuks AB. Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and treatment perspectives. Pediatr Dent 2008;30:211–219. PMID: 18615986.
Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, et al. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endodontic Topics 2005;10:77–102. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00135.x
Kuo C, Wang Y, Chang H, et al. Application of Ni-Ti rotary files for pulpectomy in primary molars. J Dent Sci 2006;1:10–15. DOI: 10.30086/JDS.200603.0002
Silva LAB, Leonardo MR, Nelson-Filho P, et al. Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars. J Dent Child 2004;71:45–47. PMID: 15272656.
Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000;22:77–78. PMID: 10730297.
Rodd HD, Waterhouse PJ, Fuks AB, et al. British Society of Paediatric Dentistry. Pulp therapy for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006;16:15–23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00774.x
Crespo S, Cortes O, Garcia C, et al. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;32:295–298. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.32.4.l57l36355u606576
Pinkham JR. Behavioral themes in dentistry for children: 1968–1990. ASDC J Dent Child 1990;57:38–45. PMID: 2136747.
Roberts JF, Curzon MEJ, Koch G, et al. Review: behaviour management techniques in paediatric dentistry. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2010;11:166–174. DOI: 10.1007/BF03262738
Shinohara S, Nomura Y, Shingyouchi K, et al. Structural relationship of child behavior and its evaluation during dental treatment. J Oral Sci 2005;47:91–96. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.47.91
McDonald RE, Avery DR, Dean AJ. In: Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 8th edition. St. Louis: Mosby, 2004; p. 729.
Frankl S, Shiere F, Fogels H. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory J Dent Child 1962; 29:150–163.
Brill W. The effect of restorative treatment on children's behavior at the first recall visit in a private pediatric dental practice. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002;26:389–393. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.26.4.r1543673rx055355
Ashkenazi M, Blumer S, Eli I. Effectiveness of computerized delivery of intrasulcular anesthetic in primary molars. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:1418–1425. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0056
Ochoa-Romero T, Mendez-Gonzalez V, Flores-Reyes H, et al. Comparison between rotary and manual techniques on duration of instrumentation and obturation times in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011;35:359–363. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.35.4.8k013k21t39245n8
Makarem A, Ravandeh N, Ebrahimi M. Radiographic assessment and chair time of rotary instruments in the pulpectomy of primary second molar teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2014;8:84–89. DOI: 10.5681/joddd.2014.015
Sweet CA. Procedure for treatment of exposed and pulpless deciduous teeth**Read before the Section on Mouth Hygiene and Preventive Dentistry at the Seventy-First Annual Session of the American Dental Association, Washington, DC, Oct. 9, 1929. J Am Dent Assoc 1930;17:1150–1153.
Coll JA, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent 1996;18:57–63. PMID: 8668572.
Rathnam A, Madan N, Madan N. The language of pain: A short study. Contemp Clin Dent 2010;1:142–145. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.72778
Ramezanali F, Afkhami F, Soleimani A, et al. Comparison of cleaning efficacy and instrumentation time in primary molars: Mtwo rotary instruments vs. Hand K-files. Iran Endod J 2015;10:240–243. DOI: 10.7508/iej.2015.04.006
Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur J Dent 2017;11:376–379. DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_345_16
Pinheiro SL, Araujo G, Bincelli I, et al. Evaluation of cleaning capacity and instrumentation time of manual, hybrid and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars. Int Endod J 2012;45:379–385. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01987.x
Azar MR, Safi L, Nikaein A. Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and Pro Taper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9:146–151. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.95227
Bharuka SB, Mandroli PS. Single- versus two-visit pulpectomy treatment in primary teeth with apical periodontitis: A double-blind, parallel group, randomized controlled trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2016;34(4):383–90. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.191429
Brill WA. Child behavior in a private pediatric dental practice associated with types of visits, age and socio-economic factors. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2000;25:1–7. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.25.1.545025p1g72x730q
Gustafsson A, Arnrup K, Broberg AG, et al. Psychosocial concomitants to dental fear and behaviour management problems. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007;17:449–459. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00883.x