Human identification by virtue of dental identification is on the increase in the past few years and has served as a major adjunct in the identification process. The science associated with the dealing of evidences from dental, oral, and paraoral structures—Forensic Odontology, is a boon in itself. It has been seen that the role of forensic odontology has increased as most of the times teeth and other orally associated structures remain the only means of identification in the worst of scenarios where the conventional biometrics such as fingerprint, iris scan, palm print, etc., may be lost and are therefore not reliable enough to resolve the purpose of identification. There are various important aspects in forensic odontology which are associated with the study of tooth prints, i.e., ameloglyphics, radiographs, the study of palatal rugae patterns, i.e., rugoscopy, cheiloscopy, i.e., the study of lip patterns, tongue prints which can serve as an important biometric tool to aid in the human identification process. Dental biometrics helps to determine several parameters that serve in the interest of forensics such as type of specimen, population affinity, sex, age, stature, race, and various other individualization factors. So, comparative dental identifications with the help of a biometric recognition system will play a major role in identifying deceased individuals in disasters, crimes, or any other mass tragedies.
Kisku DR. Advances in biometrics for secure human authentication and recognition. Published by CRC Press; 2016. pp. 4–6.
Pankaj S. Biometrics – introduction, characteristics, basic technique, its types and various performance measures. Int J Emerg Res Manag Technol 2014;3(4):109–119.
Oommen N, Parmar VS. Dental biometrics as an aid in the determination of human identity. Int J Clin Case Rep 2015;5(32): 1–7.
Sexena S, Sharma P, Gupta N. Experimental studies of forensic odontology to aid in the identification process. J Foren Dent Sci 2010;2(2):69–76. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.81285.
Manjunath K, Saraswathi TR, Sriram G, et al. Reliability of automated biometrics in the analysis of enamel rod end patterns. J Foren Dent Sci 2009;1(1):32–36. DOI: 10.4103/0974-2948.50887.
Jadhav S, Shriram R. Dental biometricsused in forensic science. J Engineer Res Stud 2012;3(1):26–29.
Manigandan T, Sumathy C, Elumalai M, et al. Forensic radiology in dentistry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015;7(1):S260–S264. DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.155944.
Harjeet KS, Keya S, Sanjeet S, et al. Determination of the biometric characteristics of palatine rugae patterns in Uttar Pradesh population: a cross-sectional study. Indian J Dent Res 2014;25(3):331–335. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.138331.
Hermosilla VV, Valenzuela JS, Lopez MC, et al. Palatal rugae: systematic analysis of its shape and dimensions for use in human identification. Int J Morphol 2009;27:819–825.
Dhoke M, Osato S. Morphological study of the palatal rugae in Japanese. Bilateral difference in the regressive evolution of the palatal rugae. J Oral Biosci 1994;36(2):126–140. DOI: 10.2330/joralbiosci1965.36.126.
Suzuki K, Tsuchihashi Y. New attempt of personal identification by means of lip print. J Indian Dent Assoc 1970;42(1):8–9.
Rachana VP, Ajit DD, Vishnudas DP, et al. Cheiloscopy: revisited. J Foren Dent Sci 2012;4(1):47–52. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.99167.
Radhika T, Nadeem J, Nithya S. Tongue prints: a novel biometric and potential forensic tool. J Foren Dent Sci 2016;8(3):117–119. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.195119.
Liu Z, Zhang D, Tang QL. A tongue-print image database for recognition. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 2007;4:2235–2238.
Zhang B, Zhang H. Significant geometry features in tongue image analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015;2015:897580. DOI: 10.1155/2015/897580.
Yan Z, Wang K, Li N. Computerized feature quantification of sublingual veins from color sublingual images. Comp Methods Programs Biomed 2009;93(2):192–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.09.006.