International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 1 ( January-February, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Effect of an Oral Health Preventive Protocol on Salivary Parameters and Gingival Health of Children with Type 1 Diabetes

Singh V, Krishan Gauba, Ashima Goyal, Devi Dayal, Savita Verma, GS Prasad

Keywords : Children, Oral health, Preventive, Saliva, Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Citation Information : V S, Gauba K, Goyal A, Dayal D, Verma S, Prasad G. Effect of an Oral Health Preventive Protocol on Salivary Parameters and Gingival Health of Children with Type 1 Diabetes. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021; 14 (1):109-114.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1871

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 14-07-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Context: Type 1 diabetic children exhibit poorer oral health than general population. However, no oral health preventive protocol exists for attending to the oral health needs of such children. Aim: To evaluate the effect of an oral health preventive protocol on salivary parameters and gingival health of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus over a period of 6 months. Materials and methods: Fifty diabetic children, aged 6–12 years were selected and divided into two groups. Children in group I received a comprehensive oral health preventive protocol. The parameters recorded were oral hygiene practices, salivary flow rate, pH, buffer capacity, viscosity, electrolytes, and plaque and gingival indices. These were compared at baseline, 3-, and 6-month intervals. Statistical analysis: Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS STATISTICS (version 22.0). Tests were based on the type of data. Results: The intervention group (group I) showed favorable improvements in the parameters assessed. A greater number of participants adopted the correct oral hygiene methods. Unstimulated salivary flow rate increased from 0.36 ± 0.21 to 0.82 ± 0.16 mL/minute in group I and from 0.32 ± 0.24 to 0.58 ± 0.16 mL/minute in group II after 6 months (p = 0.001). Salivary buffer capacity increased from 3.07 ± 2.64 to 10.40 ± 0.82 in group I while in group II, it improved from 3.20 ± 1.47 to 9.33 ± 1.44 (p = 0.02). Salivary viscosity decreased in group I from 1.97 ± 0.42 to 1.15 ± 0.06 and from 1.97 ± 0.35 to 1.23 ± 0.11 in group II after 6 months (p = 0.02). Gingival scores changed from 1.07 ± 0.35 to 0.20 ± 0.23 in group I and from 1.04 ± 0.28 to 0.85 ± 0.25 in group II (p = 0.001). Conclusion: The preventive protocol used in the present study showed a significant (p < 0.05) improvement in the parameters assessed.

PDF Share
  1. Alamo SM, Soriano YJ, Perez MGS. Dental considerations for the patient with diabetes. Clin Exp Dent 2011;3(1):e25–e30. DOI: 10.4317/jced.3.e25.
  2. Amutha A, Thai K, Viswanathan M. Childhood and adolescent onset type 1 diabetes in India. MGM. J Med Sci 2013;1(1):46–53.
  3. Twetman S, Nederfors T, Aronson BSS. Two year longitudinal observations of salivary status and dental caries in children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Dent 1992;14(3):184–188.
  4. Kennath AAS, Sanjay R, Peramachi P. Evaluation of correlation between salivary Ph and prevalence of dental caries in subjects with and without diabetes mellitus. Res J Rec Sciences 2014;3:224–226.
  5. McDonald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 9th ed., Missouri: Mosby Inc; 2011.
  6. Badersten A, Egelberg J, Koch G. Effect of monthly prophylaxis on caries and gingivitis in schoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1975;3(1):1–4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1975.tb00271.x.
  7. Barenie JT, Leske GS, Ripa LW. The effect of toothbrushing frequency on oral hygiene and gingival health in schoolchildren: reassessment after two and one-half years. J Public Health Dent 1976;36(1):9–16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1976.tb02834.x.
  8. Bellini HT, Campi R, Denardi JL. Four years of monthly professional tooth cleaning and topical fluoride application in Brazilian school children-effect on gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 1981;8(3):231–238. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1981.tb02034.x.
  9. Hamp SE, Lindhe J, Fornell J, et al. Effect of a field program based on systematic plaque control on caries and gingivitis in schoolchildren after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1978;6(1):17–23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1978.tb01112.x.
  10. Rong WS, Bian JY, Wang WJ, et al. Effectiveness of an oral health education and caries prevention program in kindergartens in China. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003;31(6):412–416. DOI: 10.1046/j.1600-0528.2003.00040.x.
  11. Stephen KW, Speirs CF. Methods for collecting individual components of mixed saliva: the relevance to clinical pharmacology. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1976;3(2):315–319. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1976.tb00609.x.
  12. Loe H, Theilade E, Jensen SB. Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol 1965;36(3):177–187. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1965.36.3.177.
  13. Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22(1):121–135. DOI: 10.3109/00016356408993968.
  14. Pratibha KM, Johnson P, Ganesh M, et al. Evaluation of salivary profile among adult type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in South India. J Clin Diag Res 2013;7(8):1592–1595. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5749.3232.
  15. Busato IMS, Ignácio SA, Brancher JA, et al. Impact of clinical status and salivary conditions on xerostomia and oral health-related quality of life of adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012;40(1):62–69. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00635.x.
  16. Lasisi TJ, Fasanmade AA. Salivary flow and composition in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Niger J Physiol Sci 2012;27:79–82.
  17. Kristoffersson K, Axelsson P, Bratthall D. Effect of a professional tooth cleaning program on interdentally localized Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res 1984;18(5):385–390. DOI: 10.1159/000260792.
  18. Dutta S. Development of a preventive module with a scientific rationale for individualized therapy of caries active children [unpublished thesis]. Chandigarh: Panjab University; 1988.
  19. Anderson JL. Integration of plaque control into the practice of dentistry. Dent. Clin. North Am 1972;16:621–630.
  20. Brandli WE, McCartney MJ, Proctor N. Education in preventive pediatric dentistry. J Dent Child 1979;46:200–203.
  21. Koch G, Modeer T, Poulsen S, et al. Text book of pedodontic – a clinical approach. 1st ed., Copenhagen: Munksgard; 1997. pp. 140–141.
  22. Evans RW, Clark P, Jia N. The caries management system: are preventive effects sustained post clinical trial? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2016;44(2):188–197. DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12204.
  23. Tut OK, Milgrom PM. Topical iodine and fluoride varnish combined is more effective than fluoride varnish alone for protecting erupting first permanent molars: a retrospective cohort study. J Public Health Dent 2010;70(3):249–252. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2010.00163.x.
  24. Featherstone JD. Delivery challenges for fluoride, chlorhexidine and xylitol. BMC Oral Health 2006;6(Suppl1):S8. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-6-S1-S8.
  25. Milgrom P, Weinstein P, Huebner C, et al. Empowering head start to improve access to good oral health for children from low income families. Matern Child Health J 2008;15(7):876–882. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-008-0316-6.
  26. Twetman S, Fritzon B, Jensen B, et al. Pre- and post-treatment levels of salivary mutans Streptococci and lactobacilli in pre-school children. Inter J Paediatr Dent 1999;9(2):93–98. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-263x.1999.00108.x.
  27. Marder MZ, Abelson DC, Mandel ID. Saliva alteration in diabetes mellitus. J Periodontol 1975;46(9):567–570. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1975.46.9.567.
  28. Bay I, Rolla G. Plaque inhibition and improved gingival condition by use of a stannous fluoride toothpaste. Scand J Dent Res 1980;88(4):313–315. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1980. tb01232.x.
  29. Amin SM, Harrison RL, Benton TS, et al. Effect of povidone-iodine on Streptococcus mutans in children with extensive dental caries. Pediatr Dent 2004;26:5–10.
  30. Listgarten MA. Plaque and periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15(8):485–487. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1988.tb01019.x.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.