Citation Information :
Nezam S, Mukherjee CG, Shukla JN, Jha A, Khan SA, Tanwar AS. Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Obturation Techniques in Deciduous Teeth Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021; 14 (1):75-80.
Introduction: Pediatric dentistry has evolved from extraction acclimatized practice to prevention and preservation. Successful endodontic treatment is mandated for retention of pulpally involved primary teeth.
Aim and objective: To comparatively evaluate the obturation techniques namely lentulospiral and skini syringe with NaviTip in primary teeth using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials and methods: The study was carried out among children ranging between the ages of 4 years and 8 years of either sex with pulpal involvement of primary molars which were indicated for pulpectomy. The study population was divided into two groups according to the type of obturating technique used. Group I included samples obturated with lentulospirals while group II samples were obturated using skini syringes with NaviTip. Postoperatively, CBCT imaging was used to evaluate the quality of fill of both the obturation techniques by determining the presence of voids in the root canals.
Results: The total number of voids present in group I were 48, in which, 8 were in the coronal third, 16 in the middle third, and 24 in the apical third. On the other hand, the total number of voids present in group II was 21, out of which 7 were in the coronal third, 10 in the middle third, and 4 in the apical third. A statistically significant difference was noted between the two groups in terms of the overall voids present.
Conclusion: Within the limits imposed by the conditions used in the present study, both techniques can be used for obturation in the root canals of primary molars. Voids were observed with both the techniques, but minimum in group II, i.e., skini syringe with NaviTip.
Singh R, Chaudhary S, Manuja N, et al. A evaluation of different root canal obturation methods in primary teeth using cone beam computerized tomography. J Clin Pediat Dentis 2015;39(5):462–469. DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.5.462.
Ingle JI, Bakland LK. Endodontics. 5th ed., Hamilton: BC Decker Inc; 2002. p. 861.
Finn SB. Clinical pedodontics. 4th ed., Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1991. p. 201.
Memarpour M, Shahidi S, Meshki R. Comparison of different obturation techniques for primary molars by digital radiography. Pediatr Dent 2013;35(3):236–240.
Salama FS, Anderson RW, Hanes MC, et al. Anatomy of primary incisor and molar root canals. Pediatr Dent 1992;14(2):117–118.
Cheung GS. Survival of first-time nonsurgical root canal treatment performed in dental teaching hospital. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93(5):596–604. DOI: 10.1067/moe.2002.120254.
Reddy VV, Fernandes. Clinical and radiological evaluation of zinc oxide-eugenol and Maisto's paste as obturating materials in infected primary teeth: nine months study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prevent Dent 1996;14(2):39–44.
Nagar P, Araali V, Ninawe N. An alternative obturating technique using insulin syringe delivery system to traditional reamer: an in vivo study. J Dent Oral Biosci 2011;2(2):7–9. DOI: 10.5368/JDOB/2011. 184.108.40.206.
Bawazir OA, Salama FS. Clinical evaluation of root canal obturation methods in primary teeth. Paediatr Dent 2006;28(1):39–47.
Subba Reddy VV, Shakunthala B. Comparative assessment of three obturating techniques in primary molars: an in vivo study. Endodontology 1997;9(1):13–16.
Nagaveni B, Sneha Y, Poornima P, et al. Volumetric evaluation of different obturation techniques in primary teeth using spiral computed tomography. J Clin Pediat Dentis 2017;41(1):27–31. DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.1.27.
Singh A, Gupta N, Agarwal N, et al. A comparative volumetric evaluation of four obturating techniques in primary teeth using cone beam computed tomography. Pediatr Dent 2017;39(2):E111–E116.
Barton DJ, Clark SJ, Eleazer PD, et al. Tuned-aperture computed tomography versus parallax analog and digital radiographic images in detecting second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96(2):223–228. DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(03)00061-1.
Naoum HJ, Chandler NP, Love RM. Conventional versus storage phosphor-plate digital images to visualize the root canal system contrasted with a radiopaque medium. J Endod 2003;29(5):349–352. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200305000-00008.
Dawood A, Patel S, Brown J. Cone beam CT in dental practice. British Dent J 2009;207(1):23–28. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.560.
Demiralp KÖ, Kamburoğlu K, Güngör K, et al. Assessment of endodontically treated teeth by using different radiographic methods: an ex vivo comparison between CBCT and other radiographic techniques. Imaging Sci Dent 2012;42(3):129–137. DOI: 10.5624/isd.2012.42.3.129.
Aylard SR, Johnson R. Assessment of filling techniques for primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 1987;9(3):195–198.
Sadrian R, Coll JA. A long-term follow up on the retention rate of zinc oxide eugenol filler after primary tooth pulpectomy. Pediatr Dent 1993;15(4):249–253.
Sigurdsson A, Stancill R, Madisson S. Intracanal placement of calcium hydroxide: a comparison of techniques. J Endod 1992;18(8):367–370. DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)81220-3.
Guelmann M, McEachern M, Turner C. Pulpectomies in primary incisors using three delivery systems: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2004;28(4):323–326. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.28.4.j634167443m061n3.
Dandashi MB, Nazif MM, Zullo T, et al. An in vitro comparison of three endodontic techniques for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent 1993;15(4):254–256.
Estrela C, Neto IM, Lopes HP, et al. Root canal filling with calcium hydroxide: using different techniques. Braz Dent J 2002(1):53–56.