International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 1 ( January-February, 2021 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Different Core Build-up Materials: An In Vitro Study

Buneet Kaur, Sunil Gupta, Rashu Grover, Gunmeen Sadana, Teena Gupta, Manjul Mehra

Keywords : Core build-up materials, Endodontically treated teeth, Fracture resistance, Premolars

Citation Information : Kaur B, Gupta S, Grover R, Sadana G, Gupta T, Mehra M. Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Different Core Build-up Materials: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021; 14 (1):51-58.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1901

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 14-07-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

The aim is to evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with posterior direct composite (PRC) resin, bulk-fill composite resin, dual-cure composite (DCC) resin, and short fiber-reinforced composite (SFC) resin material. Materials and methods: Ninety sound maxillary premolar teeth were divided into 6 groups which comprised 15 teeth each. Group I was a negative control group where neither cavity preparation nor root canal treatment was done on the specimen. Group II was named positive control group as it was left unrestored after mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) preparation and root canal treatment. Groups III to VI were filled with PRC, bulk-fill composite, DCC, and SFC, respectively, and subjected to fracture testing in a universal testing machine. Results: After statistical analysis, it was seen that group VI had increased mean fracture resistance as compared to other groups. Conclusion: It was concluded that short fiber-reinforced composite proved to have superior properties that other experimental groups and hence can be used as a core build-up material. Clinical significance: The core build-up is requisite as the residual tooth structure after endodontic procedure decreases and core build-up supplements the resistance and retention of the tooth structure.


PDF Share
  1. Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth: post, core and the final restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136(5):611–619. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0232.
  2. Sengun A, Cobankara FK, Orucoglu H. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Traumatol 2008;24(2):214–219. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2007.00538.x.
  3. Nagasiri R, Chitmongkolsuk S. Long-term survival of endodontically treated molars without crown coverage: a retrospective cohort study. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93(2):164–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.11.001.
  4. Saunders WP, Saunders EM. Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in root-canal therapy: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994;10(3):105–108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1994.tb00533.x.
  5. Siqueira Jr JF, Rôças IN, Lopes HP, et al. Coronal leakage of two root canal sealers containing calcium hydroxide after exposure to human saliva. J Endod 1999;25(1):14–16. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80391-4.
  6. Morgano SM, Brackett SE. Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: current knowledge and future needs. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82(6):643–657. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70005-3.
  7. Bonilla ED, Mardirossian G, Caputo AA. Fracture toughness of various core build-up materials. J Prosthodont 2000;9(1):14–18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2000.00014.x.
  8. Agrawal A, Mala K. An in vitro comparative evaluation of physical properties of four different types of core materials. J Conserv Dent 2014;17(3):230–233. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.131782.
  9. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68(4):584–590. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90370-p.
  10. Atalay C, Yazici AR, Horuztepe A, et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with bulk fill, bulk fill flowable, fiber-reinforced, and conventional resin composite. Oper Dent 2016;41(5):E131–E140. DOI: 10.2341/15-320-L.
  11. Eskitaşcıoğlu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod 2002;28(9):629–633. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200209000-00001.
  12. Belli S, Erdemir A, Ozcopur M, et al. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. Int Endod J 2005;38(2):73–80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00892.x.
  13. Garlapati TG, Krithikadatta J, Natanasabapathy V. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with short fiber composite used as a core material—An in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61(4):464–470. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.02.001.
  14. Ørstavik D, Pitt, Ford TR. Apical periodontitis: microbial infection and host responses. Essential endodontology: prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis. Oxford: Blackwell Science 1998. 1–8.
  15. Friedman S. Considerations and concepts of case selection in the management of post-treatment endodontic disease (treatment failure). Endod Topics 2002;1(1):54–78. DOI: 10.1034/j.1601-1546.2002.10105.x.
  16. Figini L, Lodi G, Gorni F, et al. Single versus multiple visits for endodontic treatment of permanent teeth: a cochrane systematic review. J Endod 2008;34(9):1041–1047. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen. 2008.06.009.
  17. Bayram HM, Çelikten B, Bayram E, et al. Fluid flow evaluation of coronal microleakage intraorifice barrier materials in endodontically treated teeth. Eur J Dent 2013;7(3):359–362. DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.115421.
  18. Tabassum S, Khan FR. Failure of endodontic treatment: the usual suspects. Eur J Dent 2016;10(1):144–147. DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.175682.
  19. Ellis SG, McCord JF, Burke FJ. Predisposing and contributing factors for complete and incomplete tooth fractures. Dent Update 1999;26(4):150–152. DOI: 10.12968/denu.1999.26.4.150, 156-8.
  20. Geistfeld R. Effect of prepared cavities on the strength of teeth. Oper Dent 1981;6(1):2–5.
  21. Belli S, Eraslan O, Eskitascioglu G. Direct restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a brief summary of materials and techniques. Curr Oral Health Rep 2015;2(4):182–189. DOI: 10.1007/s40496-015- 0068-5.
  22. Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC, Swift EJ. Packable composites: overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent 1999;11(5):234–249. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00405.x.
  23. Kiremitci A, Alpaslan T, Gurgan S. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations. Oper Dent 2009;34(1):11–17. DOI: 10.2341/08-48.
  24. Eapen AM, Amirtharaj LV, Sanjeev K, et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with 2 different fiber-reinforced composite and 2 conventional composite resin core buildup materials: an in vitro study. J Endod 2017;43(9):1499–1504. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.031.
  25. Kumar A, Sarthaj S. In vitro evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with bulk-fill, bulk-fill flowable, fiber-reinforced, and conventional resin composite. J Oper Dent Endod 2018;3(1):12–17. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10047- 0049.
  26. Burgess J, Cakir D. Comparative properties of low-shrinkage composite resins. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31(Spec No 2):10–15.
  27. Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17(1):227–235. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0702-8.
  28. Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Bambi C, et al. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;7(4):79–88. DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-7-4-79.
  29. Vandewalker JP, Casey JA, Lincoln TA, et al. Properties of dual-cure, bulk-fill composite resin restorative materials. Gen Dent 2016;64(2):68–73.
  30. Braga RR, Cesar PF, Gonzaga CC. Mechanical properties of resin cements with different activation modes. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29(3):257–262. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00821.x.
  31. Belli S, Erdemir A, Yildirim C. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques. Int Endod J 2006;39(2):136–142. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01057.x.
  32. Belli S, Dönmez N, Eskitascioğlu G. The effect of c-factor and flowable resin or fiber use at the interface on microtensile bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2006;8(4):247–253.
  33. Garoushi S, Tanner J, Vallittu PK, et al. Preliminary clinical evaluation of short fiber-reinforced composite resin in posterior teeth: 12-months report. Open Dent J 2012;6(1):41–45. DOI: 10.2174/1874210601206010041.
  34. Garoushi SK, Hatem M, Lassila LV, et al. The effect of short fiber composite base on microleakage and load-bearing capacity of posterior restorations. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 2015;1(1):6–12. DOI: 10.3109/23337931.2015.1017576.
  35. Mincik J, Urban D, Timkova S, et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by various direct filling materials: an in vitro study. Int J Biomater 2016;2016:9138945. DOI: 10.1155/2016/9138945.
  36. Tamse A, Zilburg I, Halpern J. Vertical root fractures in adjacent maxillary premolars: an endodontic-prosthetic perplexity. Int Endod J 1998;31(2):127–132. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00129.x.
  37. Burke FJ, Watts DC. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns. Quintessence Int 1994;25(5):335–340.
  38. Bahsi E, Colak M, Atakul F, et al. Investigation of fracture resistance of different core materials. J Int Dent Med Res 2012;5(2):85.
  39. Fonseca AS, Gerhardt KM, Pereira GD, et al. Do new matrix formulations improve resin composite resistance to degradation processes? Braz Oral Res 2013;27(5):410–416. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242013000500005.
  40. Panitiwat P, Salimee P. Effect of different composite core materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with FRC posts. J Appl Oral Sci 2017;25(2):203–210. DOI: 10.1590/1678-77572016-0306.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.