International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 1 ( January-February, 2021 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of Bite Force and the Influencing Factors Pre- and Post-cementation of Stainless Steel Crown in Children Using T-Scan

N Aishwarya, Shwetha Poovani, Prafulla Thumati

Citation Information : Aishwarya N, Poovani S, Thumati P. Comparison of Bite Force and the Influencing Factors Pre- and Post-cementation of Stainless Steel Crown in Children Using T-Scan. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021; 14 (1):46-50.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1900

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 14-07-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: In children, stainless steel crowns (SSCs) have become an invaluable restorative option for grossly decayed primary teeth. The crowns are manufactured in different sizes with preformed anatomy which requires trimming or contouring as a necessary step to fit an individual tooth. Initially, this may produce variation in the occlusal contact points yet may not result in pain or discomfort. Little research exists regarding bite force equilibration measurements in children after placing SSC, and its influencing factors such as age and gender. Aim and objective: To evaluate and compare the measurements of bite force pre- and post-cementation of SSC using the conventional technique at maximal intercuspal position (MIP) on primary molars at different time intervals and whether age and gender influence bite force measurements. Design: Bite force and occlusal contacts during occlusion were made using T-Scan III. Twenty children scheduled for treatment who needed SSCs were included. T-Scan measurements of the bite force and occlusal contacts of the maxilla and mandibular teeth were recorded and analyzed before and immediately after cementation of SSC later 4 weeks during the follow-up period. These measurements were correlated with age and gender influence. Results: There was no significant result in the percentage of bite force on the crowned tooth (placement of SSC) at different time intervals. Prematurities were present in all the groups but a significant reduction was seen on the crowned tooth from baseline to 1-month follow-up (p = 0.03). Also, a statistically significant increase in the bite force was seen in >7 years of age (p = 0.006) and no statistical significance among the gender. Conclusion: Following the standard tooth preparation, the SSC will continue to appear clinically acceptable for many years. Our study children showed an adaptable masticatory system irrespective of age and gender during growth and development.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Gavião MD, Raymundo VG, Sobrinho LC. Masticatory efficiency in children with primary dentition. Pediatr Dent 2001;23(6):499–513.
  2. Erdemci ZY, Çehreli SB, Tirali RE. Hall versus conventional stainless steel crown techniques: in vitro investigation of marginal fit and microleakage using three different luting agents. Pediatr Dent 2014;36(4):286–290.
  3. Somkuwar K. A descriptive quantitative computerized occlusal analysis system: T-scan. Int J Adv Res 2015;3(4):508–513.
  4. Ifzah PZ. Bite it right. J Harmoniz Res 2016;3(3):153–157.
  5. Alshareef AA, Alkhuriaf A, Pani SC. An evaluation of bite pattern in children with severe-early childhood caries before and after complete dental rehabilitation. Pediatr Dent 2017;39(7):455–459.
  6. Pani SC, Dimashkieh M, Mojaleed F, et al. The role of an occlusal template during the placement of preformed metal crowns in children under general anaesthesia: a randomised control trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2015;16(6):461–466. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-015-0199-3.
  7. Gallagher S, O'Connell BC, O'Connell AC. Assessment of occlusion after placement of stainless steel crowns in children: a pilot study. J Oral Rehabil 2014;41(10):730–736. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12196.
  8. Takaki P, Vieira M, Bommarito S. Maximum bite force analysis in different age groups. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;18(3):272–276. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1374647.
  9. Bakke M. Bite force and occlusion. Semin Orthod 2006;12(2):120–126. DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2006.01.005.
  10. Nelson SJ, Ash MM. Wheeler's dental anatomy, physiology, and occlusion-e-book. 10th ed., St. Louis, Mo: Saunders, Elsevier; 2014. pp. 67–99.
  11. Araújo SC, Vieira MM, Gasparotto CA, et al. Bite force analysis in different types of angle malocclusions. Revista CEFAC 2014;16(5):1567–1578. DOI: 10.1590/1982-021620145113.
  12. Van der Zee V, Van Amerongen W. Short communication: influence of preformed metal crowns (Hall technique) on the occlusal vertical dimension in the primary dentition. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2010;11(5):225–227. DOI: 10.1007/BF03262751.
  13. Roldán SI, Restrepo LG, Isaza JF, et al. Are maximum bite forces of subjects 7 to 17 years of age related to malocclusion? The Angle Orthod 2015;86(3):456–461. DOI: 10.2319/051315-323.1.
  14. Bakke M, Holm B, Jensen BL, et al. Unilateral, isometric bite force in 8-68-year-old women and men related to occlusal factors. Eur J Oral Sciences 1990;98(2):149–158. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1990.tb00954.x.
  15. Koc D, Dogan A, Bek B. Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: a literature review. Eur J Dent 2010;4(2):223. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697833.
  16. Pereira-Cenci T, Pereira LJ, Cenci MS, et al. Maximal bite force and its association with temporomandibular disorders. Braz Dent J 2007;18(1):65–68. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-64402007000100014.
  17. Bonjardim LR, Gavião MBD, Pereira LJ, et al. Bite force determination in adolescents with and without temporomandibular dysfunction. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32(8):577–583. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01465.x.
  18. Szymańska J. Bite force and its correlation with long face in children and youth. Folia Morphol (Praha) 2015;74(4):513–517. DOI: 10.5603/FM.2015.0116.
  19. Van Der Bilt A, Tekamp FA, Van Der Glas HW, et al. Bite force and electromyography during maximum unilateral and bilateral clenching. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116(3):217–222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00531.x.
  20. Linderholm H, Lindqvist B, Ringqvist M, et al. Isometric biting force in children and its relation to body build and general muscle force. Acta Odontol Scand 1971;29(5):563–568. DOI: 10.3109/00016357109026334.
  21. Kiliaridis S, Kjellberg H, Wemieberg B, et al. (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, Sweden). The relationship between maximal bite force, bite force endurance and facial morphology during growth. A cross-sectional study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51(5):323–331. DOI: 10.3109/00016359309040583.
  22. Abu Alhaija E, Al Zo'ubi I, Al Rousan M, et al. Maximum occlusal bite forces in Jordanian individuals with different dentofacial vertical skeletal patterns. Eur J Orthod 2010;32(1):71–77. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp069.
  23. Shinogaya T, Bakke M, Thomsen CE, et al. Effects of ethnicity, gender and age on clenching force and load distribution. Clin Oral Invest 2001;5(1):63–68. DOI: 10.1007/s007840000099.
  24. Olthoff LW, Van Der Glas W, Van Der Blit A. Influence of occlusal vertical dimension on the masticatory performance during chewing with maxillary splints. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34(8):560–565. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01730.x.
  25. Pizolato RA, Gavião MBD, Berretin-Felix G, et al. Maximal bite force in young adults temporomandibular disorders and bruxism. Braz Oral Res 2007;21(3):278–283. DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242007000300015.
  26. Singh S, Sandhu N, Kashyap R. A study of bite force and various variables in children segregated by angle's classification. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012;5(2):118. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005- 1148.
  27. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, et al. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31(1):18–22. DOI: 10.1046/j.0305-182x.2003.01179.x.
  28. Braun S, Hnat WP, Freudenthaler JW, et al. A study of maximum bite force during growth and development. Angle Orthod 1996;66(4):261–264. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1996)0662.3.CO;2.
  29. Garner LD, Kotwal NS. Correlation study of incisive biting forces with age, sex and anterior occlusion. J Dent Res 1973;52(4):698–702. DOI: 10.1177/00220345730520041001.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.