International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE S1 ( Supplement, 2020 ) > List of Articles


Comparative Study of Effects of LASER, TENS, and Anesthetic Gel for Controlling Pain after Placement of Elastomeric Separators: A Clinical Trial

Malhar J Oza, Hina Desai, Shreya S Iyengar, Mansi Kadivar

Keywords : Anesthetic gel, Low-level LASER, Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation, Visual analog scale

Citation Information :

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1864

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Aim: This study aimed to study the intensity and duration of patients’ pain perception after placement of elastomeric separators and the effects of various methods to reduce the pain. Materials and methods: Elastomeric separators were placed on either side of first molars in 120 patients which were divided into 4 groups. Patients in group I were control group, group II underwent low-level LASER therapy, group III were subjected to topical anesthetic gel, and group IV underwent TENS (transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation). And then they were asked to measure pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 5 intervals of time, i.e., immediately after separator placement, after day 1, day 2, day 3, and day 4. Results: Turkey\'s post hoc test showed that pain score after immediate placement of separators was found to be the least in the anesthetic gel than that in other groups and pain score was least in the LASER group out of all four groups on day 1, 2, 3, and 4. Conclusion: It was found that low-level LASER therapy was more effective in reducing pain after placement of elastomeric separators.

PDF Share
  1. Bennett CR. Pain. In: Bennett CR, ed. Monheim's local anesthesia and pain control in dental practice. 7th ed., Delhi, India: CBS Publishers; 1990. pp. 20–21.
  2. Sacerdote P, Levrini L. Peripheral mechanisms of dental pain: the role of substance P. Mediators Inflamm 2012;2012:951920. DOI: 10.1155/2012/951920.
  3. Nimeri G, Kau CH, Abou-Kheir NS, et al. Acceleration of tooth movement during orthodontic treatment—a frontier in orthodontics. Prog Orthod 2013;14(1):42. DOI: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-42.
  4. Wang H, Kohno T, Amaya F, et al. Bradykinin produces pain hypersensitivity by potentiating spinal cord glutamatergic synaptic transmission. J Neurosci 2005;25(35):7986–7992. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2393-05.2005.
  5. Krishnan V. Orthodontic pain: from causes to management - a review. Eur J Orthod 2007;29(2):170–179. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjl081.
  6. Ngan P, Kess B, Wilson S. Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96(1):47–53. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90228-X.
  7. Lim H-M, Lew KKK, Tay DKL. A clinical investigation of the efficacy of low level laser therapy in reducing orthodontic postadjustment pain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108(6):614–622. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70007-2.
  8. Roth PM, Thrash WJ. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for controlling pain associated with orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986;90(2):132–138. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(86)90045-4.
  9. Huskisson E. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974;ii(7889):1127–1131. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)90884-8.
  10. Bergius M, Berggren U, Kiliaridis S. Experience of pain during an orthodontic procedure. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110(2):92–98. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.11193.x.
  11. Eslamian L, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Hassanzadeh-Azhiri A. The effect of 810-nm low-level laser therapy on pain caused by orthodontic elastomeric separators. Lasers Med Sci 2014;29(2):559–564. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-012-1258-1.
  12. Kluemper GT, Hiser DG, Rayens MK, et al. Efficacy of a wax containing benzocaine in the relief of oral mucosal pain caused by orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122(4):359–365. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.126405.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.